Montana House Candidate Greg Gianforte Just Body-slammed a Reporter

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Montana House Candidate Greg Gianforte Just Body-slammed a Reporter

Post by clubgop » Tue May 30, 2017 4:03 pm

California wrote:Back to Gianforte...

I can't find the article now, but I saw a particularly deranged article today urging people to move their investments and look for dual passport options to get out of the US. This Gianforte situation is demonstrating to the REEEE-ing snowflake that we are just now lost
Why are you reading Salon?

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Montana House Candidate Greg Gianforte Just Body-slammed a Reporter

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue May 30, 2017 4:03 pm

California wrote:Back to Gianforte...

I can't find the article now, but I saw a particularly deranged article today urging people to move their investments and look for dual passport options to get out of the US. This Gianforte situation is demonstrating to the REEEE-ing snowflake that we are just now lost

It's gotten more hilarious. People dug up tweets from that reporter where he encouraged violence against a conservative journalist. They want the special right to hit with impunity and then act shocked when they get hit.

User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: Montana House Candidate Greg Gianforte Just Body-slammed a Reporter

Post by Ex-California » Tue May 30, 2017 4:04 pm

clubgop wrote:
California wrote:Back to Gianforte...

I can't find the article now, but I saw a particularly deranged article today urging people to move their investments and look for dual passport options to get out of the US. This Gianforte situation is demonstrating to the REEEE-ing snowflake that we are just now lost
Why are you reading Salon?
It got linked on a Facebook group I'm on
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Montana House Candidate Greg Gianforte Just Body-slammed a Reporter

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Tue May 30, 2017 5:45 pm

clubgop wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
The elites have been picking winners forever... that is because the gen. pop. of the US are foolish and believe what they are told instead of finding out if what they have been told is the truth or not.
And so you're going to blame that on an entire generation of "bad people", rather than the complete failure of our institutions? :doh:
Any supporter of NPR saying they support fixing the Press. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Fuck off. We know what your SJW ass wants.
Pretty simple, really. Write a law that news broadcasts will be held by selected networks, commercial-free, and subsidized by the government. Conditional that there be no influence From said government.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Calculus Man
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:22 pm

Re: Montana House Candidate Greg Gianforte Just Body-slammed a Reporter

Post by Calculus Man » Tue May 30, 2017 5:48 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
clubgop wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
And so you're going to blame that on an entire generation of "bad people", rather than the complete failure of our institutions? :doh:
Any supporter of NPR saying they support fixing the Press. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Fuck off. We know what your SJW ass wants.
Pretty simple, really. Write a law that news broadcasts will be held by selected networks, commercial-free, and subsidized by the government. Conditional that there be no influence From said government.
That's ridiculous.

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Montana House Candidate Greg Gianforte Just Body-slammed a Reporter

Post by Fife » Tue May 30, 2017 7:19 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
clubgop wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
And so you're going to blame that on an entire generation of "bad people", rather than the complete failure of our institutions? :doh:
Any supporter of NPR saying they support fixing the Press. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Fuck off. We know what your SJW ass wants.
Pretty simple, really. Write a law that news broadcasts will be held by selected networks, commercial-free, and subsidized by the government. Conditional that there be no influence From said government.

You really might be some kind of idiot savant. Because that is absolutely hilarious. Seriously, that would make for a really funny book or movie.

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: Montana House Candidate Greg Gianforte Just Body-slammed a Reporter

Post by PartyOf5 » Tue May 30, 2017 7:34 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote: Pretty simple, really. Write a law that news broadcasts will be held by selected networks, commercial-free, and subsidized by the government. Conditional that there be no influence From said government.
No influence from the group that is doing the subsidizing? Are you serious? But, but.....there's a CONDITION!

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Montana House Candidate Greg Gianforte Just Body-slammed a Reporter

Post by TheReal_ND » Tue May 30, 2017 9:04 pm

Image

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Montana House Candidate Greg Gianforte Just Body-slammed a Reporter

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Tue May 30, 2017 9:49 pm

Yeah, you're right. Fuck democracy. Sell me some sham-wows.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
jbird4049
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:56 pm

Re: Montana House Candidate Greg Gianforte Just Body-slammed a Reporter

Post by jbird4049 » Wed May 31, 2017 12:20 am

PartyOf5 wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote: Pretty simple, really. Write a law that news broadcasts will be held by selected networks, commercial-free, and subsidized by the government. Conditional that there be no influence From said government.
No influence from the group that is doing the subsidizing? Are you serious? But, but.....there's a CONDITION!
TheReal_ND wrote:Image
Actually, that does work in some countries particularly in Europe. Anyways it's not a straight up funding, but instead a partial substitute for the disappearing advertising revenue. The reason American news journalism has gotten so bad (besides the MBAs taking over) is the lack of revenue as it is almost impossible to charge enough to cover costs. 20 years ago newspaper would charge 50 cents but make something like over a dollar in ad revenue. I'm guessing it would take over 3 dollars per paper now without ads.

The Europeans have stopped that, but I don't know how well. Maybe if Bjorn, or Montegriff could comment?

Anyways the reason Public Broadcasting has gotten so snooty, and elitist, is because they don't receive government funding or if they do it's next to nothing. Only people with actual money will donate and their interests count.
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.