Historical Arguments and Debates

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Historical Arguments and Debates

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

C-Mag wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:54 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:49 am
C-Mag wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:45 am

That's interesting, because the majority opinion is that these Sea Peoples attacked the coastal trade centers so often they had to be abandoned and this led to the Trade Collapse.
What do you think was the cause of the trade collapse ?
Could be the sea people disrupted shipping enough that merchants raised prices and toppled a leveraged system into collapse.

The notion that they singlehandedly toppled 4-5 major empires is pretty absurd though.
The Vikings did that very thing in the North Sea and Baltic 2000 years later. Took England, Ireland, Normandy, Russia, portions of France, Netherlands, Poland, etc.
They took some areas of underdeveloped nations, but never caused a full-scale collapse of trade.

England wasn’t even “England” yet, and Russia was still just tribes. France was a coherent power, but they weren’t anything like an empire.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Historical Arguments and Debates

Post by Montegriffo »

C-Mag wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:51 am
Montegriffo wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:44 am The iron age killed them off.
That and quantitative easing.
It very well could have been that Iron Age technology was stolen from the Eastern Mediterranean and taken back to the Aegean region that really developed the new iron technology.
There are many theories from climate change to volcanic eruptions but having your weapons become almost obsolete over night makes a lot of sense to me.
Iron was more available than copper and tin and weapons could be produced in larger numbers leading to larger armies.
Out with the old, in with the new.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Historical Arguments and Debates

Post by C-Mag »

SuburbanFarmer wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:57 am
C-Mag wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:54 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:49 am

Could be the sea people disrupted shipping enough that merchants raised prices and toppled a leveraged system into collapse.

The notion that they singlehandedly toppled 4-5 major empires is pretty absurd though.
The Vikings did that very thing in the North Sea and Baltic 2000 years later. Took England, Ireland, Normandy, Russia, portions of France, Netherlands, Poland, etc.
They took some areas of underdeveloped nations, but never caused a full-scale collapse of trade.

England wasn’t even “England” yet, and Russia was still just tribes. France was a coherent power, but they weren’t anything like an empire.
OK, so what do you think caused the trade collapse.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Historical Arguments and Debates

Post by C-Mag »

Montegriffo wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:59 am
C-Mag wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:51 am
Montegriffo wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:44 am The iron age killed them off.
That and quantitative easing.
It very well could have been that Iron Age technology was stolen from the Eastern Mediterranean and taken back to the Aegean region that really developed the new iron technology.
There are many theories from climate change to volcanic eruptions but having your weapons become almost obsolete over night makes a lot of sense to me.
Iron was more available than copper and tin and weapons could be produced in larger numbers leading to larger armies.
Out with the old, in with the new.
What I'm hearing is foreign powers with superior weapons destroyed the Bronze Age Kingdoms from Egypte to Anatolia ?
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Historical Arguments and Debates

Post by Speaker to Animals »

C-Mag wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:40 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:38 am Hebrews
So, not Bronze Age 'vikings' raiding the coastal centers, not climate change destroying crops............ the Hebrew Exodus ?

More please
That was them. Hebrews were the Sea People.
User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: Historical Arguments and Debates

Post by Hastur »

Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 12:13 pm
C-Mag wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:40 am
Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:38 am Hebrews
So, not Bronze Age 'vikings' raiding the coastal centers, not climate change destroying crops............ the Hebrew Exodus ?

More please
That was them. Hebrews were the Sea People.
I though it was the Philistines that were suposed to be the Sea Peoples.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Historical Arguments and Debates

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

C-Mag wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 12:02 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:57 am
C-Mag wrote: Wed Aug 22, 2018 11:54 am

The Vikings did that very thing in the North Sea and Baltic 2000 years later. Took England, Ireland, Normandy, Russia, portions of France, Netherlands, Poland, etc.
They took some areas of underdeveloped nations, but never caused a full-scale collapse of trade.

England wasn’t even “England” yet, and Russia was still just tribes. France was a coherent power, but they weren’t anything like an empire.
OK, so what do you think caused the trade collapse.
Like I said, the sea peoples probably disrupted shipping enough that merchants raised their prices. The system was over-leveraged and collapsed.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Historical Arguments and Debates

Post by C-Mag »

Round Up

Monte --> Iron Age Weapons defeat Bronze Age Weapons
SubFarmer --> Economic Collapse brought on by Bronze Age 'vikings'
StA --> Hebrew Sea People
Hastur --> Bronze Age Flower Power :dance:
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Historical Arguments and Debates

Post by Speaker to Animals »

Not just the Hebrews. I don't think they were one people. They were described as a federation of different peoples.

It wasn't just by sea either.
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Historical Arguments and Debates

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

The Hebrews were stunningly important to history, for some desert nomads that didn’t control territory.

And apparently, were also sea faring raiders that scared the Assyrians.

Dude seriously. They thought a boat was simply a gigantic wooden cube, and could hold a million animals.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0