Can the State Feed People? lulz
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz
It's like Virginia, the SJW's come to tear down the monument to Marse Robert, and not only do the white Virginians not care, they're all for it, that's what SA is like now.
If you ask a white person in SA who the Father of the Nation is, they're going to say "Mandela".
If you ask a white person in SA who the Father of the Nation is, they're going to say "Mandela".
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz
If you loaded up on millions of white SA's, I bet you most of them would go to the southwest Red States, because they're not up for winter, and then they'd tip the balance to the Blue, it would be like Austin spreading out to take over, Texas would fall to the SJWs, Arizona would fall, 5 million Democrat party types, dumped into the desert behind Red lines, all at once, no gerrymandering would be able to stop them.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz
I'm with Smitty - They fucked up their own homeland - I don't want them doing the same to mine.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz
It wasn't them that did it. It was the leftists in the rest of the Western World that embargoed them.
Everybody wanted to pretend like Nelson Mandela was this saintly little man (he wasn't).
Everybody wanted to pretend like Nelson Mandela was this saintly little man (he wasn't).
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz
As far as them bringing their mistakes here.. one could have said the same thing about most of the Cubans who escaped to Florida (people probably did make that very argument). How did that pan out?
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz
Speaker to Animals wrote:As far as them bringing their mistakes here.. one could have said the same thing about most of the Cubans who escaped to Florida (people probably did make that very argument). How did that pan out?
Cubans refugees arn't elitist white liberals....
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz
You want to make that comparison.....then let the white south Africans experience their utopia for 10-20 years....then let them in here....
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz
Most Cubans supported the communist revolution, including probably the majority of them who ended up fleeing here. They know what Marxism does. They don't fall for the democrats' song and dance.Zlaxer wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:As far as them bringing their mistakes here.. one could have said the same thing about most of the Cubans who escaped to Florida (people probably did make that very argument). How did that pan out?
Cubans refugees arn't elitist white liberals....
Wait till the very end when the South African whites are facing imminent genocide. They will know the score.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz
Zlaxer wrote:You want to make that comparison.....then let the white south Africans experience their utopia for 10-20 years....then let them in here....
They have a few years at most before the extermination.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz
South Africa was never embargoed, the South African economy was booming in 1990 when they ended Apartheid, highest GDP ever to that point, there was no economic pressure on them to end Apartheid, for all the leftist talk of boycotts, major western economies declined to boycott them, so that never had any impact, support for the policy collapsed because the majority of whites simply stopped supporting it, on grounds of morality, not economics.
The National Party was backed by Reagan, it was backed by Thatcher, the South Africans were a bulwark against the Soviets, they had huge support on the right in the US and UK in particular, they had diamonds, they had gold, they were a major arms exporter, they were making money hand over fist, just on the Krugerrand alone they were one of the most liquid countries on earth, cranking out a thousand metric tons of gold per year, nobody would boycott them because they were too rich, they had gold coming out of their ears, they never suffered economically because of Apartheid.
It was however the economic growth which basically doomed Apartheid, because as the economy grew and diversified, South Africa became increasingly urbanized, the whites moved to the big cities, and as they did, they became ever more cosmopolitan and liberalized, until support for Apartheid was basically just concentrated in the conservative rural areas, and they got outvoted by the big city liberals.
Really not that complex, the western liberal media and associated celebrity elites starting calling them fascists, and the by then majority liberal white population decided they could not be that, by 1990, Jim Crow was simply not morally acceptable anymore, even in South Africa.
The National Party was backed by Reagan, it was backed by Thatcher, the South Africans were a bulwark against the Soviets, they had huge support on the right in the US and UK in particular, they had diamonds, they had gold, they were a major arms exporter, they were making money hand over fist, just on the Krugerrand alone they were one of the most liquid countries on earth, cranking out a thousand metric tons of gold per year, nobody would boycott them because they were too rich, they had gold coming out of their ears, they never suffered economically because of Apartheid.
It was however the economic growth which basically doomed Apartheid, because as the economy grew and diversified, South Africa became increasingly urbanized, the whites moved to the big cities, and as they did, they became ever more cosmopolitan and liberalized, until support for Apartheid was basically just concentrated in the conservative rural areas, and they got outvoted by the big city liberals.
Really not that complex, the western liberal media and associated celebrity elites starting calling them fascists, and the by then majority liberal white population decided they could not be that, by 1990, Jim Crow was simply not morally acceptable anymore, even in South Africa.
Nec Aspera Terrent