Prostitution for Debt - The New Cool Thing!

[apeman]

I don't know if it really pans out. A very rich guy who just wants to "own" a chick for sex hires them as assistants or maids or whatever. He at least gets something else out of the deal. Otherwise, he probably would not be rich..

That's what I assume.

[Martin Hash]

[Okeefenokee]

This sort of thing is more common, during Gilded Age phases.

No chance at all that you're talking out your ass.



We all know about the cyclical nature of internet prostitution rings among young college girls in gilded ages.

Vanderbilt! We know what you did!

[Speaker to Animals]

Prostitution was common as fuck throughout all of history except for the time that women got the vote until now.

[SuburbanFarmer]

This sort of thing is more common, during Gilded Age phases.

No chance at all that you're talking out your ass.



We all know about the cyclical nature of internet prostitution rings among young college girls in gilded ages.

Vanderbilt! We know what you did!

I was talking more specifically about the “mistress” model - the “girls on the side” retained full time, for money. But I do understand how that could have been confusing for our autistic posters. Apologies.

[Okeefenokee]

All you're saying is prostitution exists.

Where can we buy your book?

[C-Mag]

All you're saying is prostitution exists.

Where can we buy your book?

Hey, Okee, youre in college. Give me some sugar and I'll buy your blue books for next semester.

[SuburbanFarmer]

All you're saying is prostitution exists.

Where can we buy your book?

Hey, Okee, youre in college. Give me some sugar and I'll buy your blue books for next semester.

blue books.

He’s got Intro to Algebra on the docket.

[heydaralon]

In Daniel Bababouie's Carvaggio podcast he discussed how in the 16th century Rome had a population of 110,000 with 12,000 of those citizens being prostitutes. Their experiences varied somewhat. You had the rich mistresses who got paid handsomely by the nobles and wealthy merchants who slept with them, to the larger percentage who eked out a miserable and destitute existence giving back alley blowjobs. Think about that for a moment though. If these figures are to be trusted, a little more than 1 in 9 Romans were selling their bodies. That is insane. How could a city with that small of a population even support that high a percentage of prostitutes? Keep in mind, most of the johns were probably poor as fuck too. I'm just struggling to understand how this economy of sex for money could even be this saturated.

[SuburbanFarmer]

In Daniel Bababouie's Carvaggio podcast he discussed how in the 16th century Rome had a population of 110,000 with 12,000 of those citizens being prostitutes. Their experiences varied somewhat. You had the rich mistresses who got paid handsomely by the nobles and wealthy merchants who slept with them, to the larger percentage who eked out a miserable and destitute existence giving back alley blowjobs. Think about that for a moment though. If these figures are to be trusted, a little more than 1 in 9 Romans were selling their bodies. That is insane. How could a city with that small of a population even support that high a percentage of prostitutes? Keep in mind, most of the johns were probably poor as fuck too. I'm just struggling to understand how this economy of sex for money could even be this saturated.

During the Renaissance? Rome was a wealthy place. Probably a good chunk of them were there for the merchants, artists, and tourists coming to town.
Not to mention the Vatican orgies.