GrumpyCatFace wrote:If we are at war, then name the target. A military target.
Mecca.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:If we are at war, then name the target. A military target.
Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:If we are at war, then name the target. A military target.
Mecca.
Your position is quickly becoming fanatical....Even a free society has its limits.....I say its better to strip away the rights of non-citizens than to make citizens submit to terror, or to encroach the rights of the citizens to defend the rights of non-citizens. In other words, Islam needs to be contained to the ME...no immigration to civilized nations period.GrumpyCatFace wrote:If we are at war, then name the target. A military target.
TheReal_ND wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:If we are at war, then name the target. A military target.
Mecca.
Ok. Here's the rest of the image because I don't think you understood the meme....Speaker to Animals wrote:TheReal_ND wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:
Mecca.
Why do you think I want to mine asteroids?
I heard you fuckers like asteroids, so I dropped an asteroid on your asteroid.
And I say that the act of 'submitting to terror' would be exactly what you propose - giving in to base fear and anger, lashing out, and going to some kind of idiotic war with 1 billion humans scattered around the planet. We would become the Great Satan that they are trying to paint us as.Zlaxer wrote:Your position is quickly becoming fanatical....Even a free society has its limits.....I say its better to strip away the rights of non-citizens than to make citizens submit to terror, or to encroach the rights of the citizens to defend the rights of non-citizens. In other words, Islam needs to be contained to the ME...no immigration to civilized nations period.GrumpyCatFace wrote:If we are at war, then name the target. A military target.
....sucks for the non-durka durk mussies....but it's simply not fair to the rest of the world's citizens to place them in constant danger just so we can say we stay 100% true to our ideals....
We don't have to go to war with Islam. Just quit importing them like they are the world's Mexicans. Why is that so hard to do? Why do you object to immigration reform?GrumpyCatFace wrote:And I say that the act of 'submitting to terror' would be exactly what you propose - giving in to base fear and anger, lashing out, and going to some kind of idiotic war with 1 billion humans scattered around the planet. We would become the Great Satan that they are trying to paint us as.Zlaxer wrote:Your position is quickly becoming fanatical....Even a free society has its limits.....I say its better to strip away the rights of non-citizens than to make citizens submit to terror, or to encroach the rights of the citizens to defend the rights of non-citizens. In other words, Islam needs to be contained to the ME...no immigration to civilized nations period.GrumpyCatFace wrote:If we are at war, then name the target. A military target.
....sucks for the non-durka durk mussies....but it's simply not fair to the rest of the world's citizens to place them in constant danger just so we can say we stay 100% true to our ideals....
Also, who the hell is 'in constant danger', outside of an ISIS-controlled city? You know as well as I do that you're more likely to get hit by lightning while being eaten by a bull shark, than encounter a terrorist.