Speaker sometimes makes my arguments for me. (I'm not sure he's aware of it.)GrumpyCatFace wrote:I'm on the edge of my seat for this one...Speaker to Animals wrote:Personhood != people;
Recent Trends in Corporate Personhood and the Overexpansion of Corporate Rights
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Recent Trends in Corporate Personhood and the Overexpansion of Corporate Rights
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Recent Trends in Corporate Personhood and the Overexpansion of Corporate Rights
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Aaaaaand strike three.Speaker to Animals wrote:Corporations, by definition, are legal persons. Otherwise you'd not be able to tax them, sue them, etc.
They are a grouping of people, formed into a company. You can tax that company as a collective entity, and therefore the people within it, but that doesn't make it "a person".
Do the other amendments apply? Are corporations granted the right to have a religion, and bear arms? Looking forward to Exxon-Mobile's missile defense program, or Disneys private militia.
LMFAO
A corporation is literally a legal person. That's what it means. It's a legal fiction that makes it possible for corporations to exist within our legal system.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/corporationsThe law treats a corporation as a legal "person" that has standing to sue and be sued, distinct from its stockholders. The legal independence of a corporation prevents shareholders from being personally liable for corporate debts. It also allows stockholders to sue the corporation through a derivative suit and makes ownership in the company (shares) easily transferable. The legal "person" status of corporations gives the business perpetual life; deaths of officials or stockholders do not alter the corporation's structure.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Recent Trends in Corporate Personhood and the Overexpansion of Corporate Rights
You are literally talking out of your ass. Again.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:Aaaaaand strike three.Speaker to Animals wrote:Corporations, by definition, are legal persons. Otherwise you'd not be able to tax them, sue them, etc.
They are a grouping of people, formed into a company. You can tax that company as a collective entity, and therefore the people within it, but that doesn't make it "a person".
Do the other amendments apply? Are corporations granted the right to have a religion, and bear arms? Looking forward to Exxon-Mobile's missile defense program, or Disneys private militia.
LMFAO
A corporation is literally a legal person. That's what it means. It's a legal fiction that makes it possible for corporations to exist within our legal system.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/corporationsThe law treats a corporation as a legal "person" that has standing to sue and be sued, distinct from its stockholders. The legal independence of a corporation prevents shareholders from being personally liable for corporate debts. It also allows stockholders to sue the corporation through a derivative suit and makes ownership in the company (shares) easily transferable. The legal "person" status of corporations gives the business perpetual life; deaths of officials or stockholders do not alter the corporation's structure.
Does a corporation have the other constitutional rights? Does it stand liable to criminal proceedings? How does one put a corporation in jail? Are they put to death when found liable for murder?
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Recent Trends in Corporate Personhood and the Overexpansion of Corporate Rights
Yep. Tell me again how that worked out for them?Okeefenokee wrote:you just can't help yourself.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Aaaaaand strike three.Speaker to Animals wrote:Corporations, by definition, are legal persons. Otherwise you'd not be able to tax them, sue them, etc.
They are a grouping of people, formed into a company. You can tax that company as a collective entity, and therefore the people within it, but that doesn't make it "a person".
Do the other amendments apply? Are corporations granted the right to have a religion, and bear arms? Looking forward to Exxon-Mobile's missile defense program, or Disneys private militia.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Recent Trends in Corporate Personhood and the Overexpansion of Corporate Rights
GrumpyCatFace wrote:You are literally talking out of your ass. Again.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Aaaaaand strike three.
They are a grouping of people, formed into a company. You can tax that company as a collective entity, and therefore the people within it, but that doesn't make it "a person".
Do the other amendments apply? Are corporations granted the right to have a religion, and bear arms? Looking forward to Exxon-Mobile's missile defense program, or Disneys private militia.
LMFAO
A corporation is literally a legal person. That's what it means. It's a legal fiction that makes it possible for corporations to exist within our legal system.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/corporationsThe law treats a corporation as a legal "person" that has standing to sue and be sued, distinct from its stockholders. The legal independence of a corporation prevents shareholders from being personally liable for corporate debts. It also allows stockholders to sue the corporation through a derivative suit and makes ownership in the company (shares) easily transferable. The legal "person" status of corporations gives the business perpetual life; deaths of officials or stockholders do not alter the corporation's structure.
Does a corporation have the other constitutional rights? Does it stand liable to criminal proceedings? How does one put a corporation in jail? Are they put to death when found liable for murder?
Yes.
A corporation possesses the freedom of speech (Citizens United), and in some cases the freedom of religion (Hobby Lobby). A corporation can be charged with crimes (Arthur Anderson).
Next question.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Recent Trends in Corporate Personhood and the Overexpansion of Corporate Rights
They went to the supreme court and won.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Yep. Tell me again how that worked out for them?Okeefenokee wrote:you just can't help yourself.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Aaaaaand strike three.
They are a grouping of people, formed into a company. You can tax that company as a collective entity, and therefore the people within it, but that doesn't make it "a person".
Do the other amendments apply? Are corporations granted the right to have a religion, and bear arms? Looking forward to Exxon-Mobile's missile defense program, or Disneys private militia.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/13-354
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Recent Trends in Corporate Personhood and the Overexpansion of Corporate Rights
Flood of cat pics incoming.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Recent Trends in Corporate Personhood and the Overexpansion of Corporate Rights
Speaker to Animals wrote:Flood of cat pics incoming.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:29 pm
Re: Recent Trends in Corporate Personhood and the Overexpansion of Corporate Rights
The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances guarantees people the right to ask the government to provide relief for a wrong through the courts (litigation) or other governmental action. It works with the right of assembly by allowing people to join together and seek change from the government.GrumpyCatFace wrote:...that's the right to sue the government, not other people. How the fuck...Alexander PhiAlipson wrote:Redress of grievances.Martin Hash wrote:Being able to sue someone is not a Constitutional Right....
"She had yellow hair and she walked funny and she made a noise like... O my God, please don't kill me! "
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Recent Trends in Corporate Personhood and the Overexpansion of Corporate Rights
doh!Alexander PhiAlipson wrote:The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances guarantees people the right to ask the government to provide relief for a wrong through the courts (litigation) or other governmental action. It works with the right of assembly by allowing people to join together and seek change from the government.GrumpyCatFace wrote:...that's the right to sue the government, not other people. How the fuck...Alexander PhiAlipson wrote: Redress of grievances.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751