Speaker to Animals wrote:[*]
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:Martin Hash wrote:It gets tiresome; socialists insisting everyone is just like them but don't know it yet; insisting there is no "just" ideology but theirs; insisting they are virtuous & good, and everyone should be like them. But they refuse to refer to themselves as socialists! Well, what the fuck do you want us Libertyists to call you: virtuous & goodists?
If I get to choose, can I be a Libertist Socialtarian?
You sound just like a dirt bag in the Judean Peoples Front.
Yup... that pretty much sums up exactly how I feel about most terminology discussions.
Serious question to all participants though: what term is best for an ideology that simply assumes some one who is poor might not be so entirely because they are lazy, worthless slobs?
Preferably a term we can all use that doesn't carry too much pejorative baggage with the users here, simply so it can be used in debate without requiring dozens of disambiguation posts to clarify. We can add it to the official Has dictionary, revised and updated edition. I'd be happy with
