Protecting the Free-Range Kid
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
Safety just wasn't our primary concern, nobody said be reckless just for its own sake, but as I recall, nobody really brought safety up much at all, my parents just said, "go outside, come back when the street lights come on, don't get killed out there." Having them follow me around in a helicopter, that would have actually made me be deliberately reckless, just to let them know what would happen, if they didn't stop bothering me.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
Kids being involved might make a difference, but I'm not convinced.Montegriffo wrote:Not a good sign for a civilised society Okee. Maybe it's the same here, long time since I went somewhere with a high crime rate. Still can't imagine people doing nothing if a kid was involved though.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
Same here, my only rule was back in time for dinner. I grew up mostly in rural Leicestershire.Smitty-48 wrote:Safety just wasn't our primary concern, nobody said be reckless just for its own sake, but as I recall, nobody really brought safety up much at all, my parents just said, "go outside, come back when the street lights come on, don't get killed out there." Having them follow me around in a helicopter, that would have actually made me be deliberately reckless, just to let them know what would happen, if they didn't stop bothering me.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
On one of our excursions, my sister and I found a big slippery rock back in the woods. It had at least a good two hundred feet of water slide effect, with a pool of water at the bottom. We had fun sliding down and running back to the top. When we got home and told Dad what we'd found, he told us that was a waste water treatment plant, and not to get back in that water. I guess we coulda got typhoid.Smitty-48 wrote:Safety just wasn't our primary concern, nobody said be reckless just for its own sake, but as I recall, nobody really brought safety up much at all, my parents just said, "go outside, come back when the street lights come on, don't get killed out there." Having them follow me around in a helicopter, that would have actually made me be deliberately reckless, just to let them know what would happen, if they didn't stop bothering me.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
That's probably all true, but it begs the question: is their parents' generation so traumatized by their own bad memories that they're determined to avoid the same fate for their children? I mean that as a serious question. I hear a lot of "nobody cared" and "I wasn't a priority" coming from my generation and they don't want their children to feel like that. Not excusing the overparenting, but it would explain it. And it seems to hold true for all generations - they want their children to avoid what made them unhappy.de officiis wrote:It's apparently part of a broad cultural shift towards protecting our kids from any sort of physical or emotional trauma. Heaven forbid that kids might actually play "army" in the back yard anymore--no doubt someone would call the police. Probably contributed to the unfortunate development of the "safe spaces" mentality that is now so prevalent on our college campuses.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
I think it's more an effect of a generation growing up seeing a dangerous world on the news acting as you would expect. When my dad was growing up, the danger on the news was some communist nation on the other side of the world. The news back then probably didn't tell everyone to be afraid of their neighbors. Another cold war might be good for the kids.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
I remember one time, I must have been seven or eight, and me and my friends used to play on the railroad tracks out behind the industrial area, and in one day, we both lived that scene from Stand By Me, where the train came when we were half way cross the bridge and we had to run for our lives, and then for an encore, we come upon all these paint cans behind this woodworking shop, so we decided to light them on fire, big ol fire going in the concrete stairwell, then all of a sudden, the paint cans start to explode, boom, boom, boom, boom, shrapnel whistling past our ears, so we scattered like rats, as we walked down the street away from there, the fire department goes wailing past in the other direction....
..when I got home, my Da asked "so what did you guys do?", to which I of course said "oh, you know, nothing much, just hanging out"
..when I got home, my Da asked "so what did you guys do?", to which I of course said "oh, you know, nothing much, just hanging out"
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
I think there is something to this. Stats show it is no more dangerous for children now than when I was a kid but everyone perceives it is worse now. Good news never sold many newspapers. Same with shitty tabloids like the Express over here blowing up every story involving Muslim or immigrant crimes as that is what some people want to read.Okeefenokee wrote:I think it's more an effect of a generation growing up seeing a dangerous world on the news acting as you would expect. When my dad was growing up, the danger on the news was some communist nation on the other side of the world. The news back then probably didn't tell everyone to be afraid of their neighbors. Another cold war might be good for the kids.
Last edited by Montegriffo on Sun Dec 11, 2016 7:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
Dad being a painter meant we had some fun times with flammables.
I've said it before, we used to chain a tire to the back of a four wheeler and go tubing on gravel roads. That was fun as shit.
I've said it before, we used to chain a tire to the back of a four wheeler and go tubing on gravel roads. That was fun as shit.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid
You all sound like you had idyllic free-range childhoods.