THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Fine. We can put solar panels on it.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
I can go to a track, but that's just going round and round, I'd like to add an intinerary to the drive, can you imagine Hollywood to the Redwoods, Cannonball Run? Now that, is 'Murica fuck yeah.pineapplemike wrote:^ I'm with you, I like that idea way more than a train to nowhere
The toll would be set by the amount of traffic, to keep it from becomming jammed up, the more people use it, the more you charge to use it, the high end cutomers will pay the premium, to Cannonball, SF to LA, LA to SF. Who wants to fly, when you have a tight whip that can clip along at just under two hunge? Have another one that goes straight to Vegas as well.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Okeefenokee wrote:I like it. I've wanted a cross country bank tube thing ever since I went to Wisconsin and found out they don't have anything I like.Speaker to Animals wrote:I have an idea. What if you built into the wall itself a cargo pipeline that would transport entire shipping containers to another port in the Gulf of Mexico more cheaply than it would cost to continue sailing through the Panama Canal?
You could eventually fork off branches to move goods to industrial centers as well.
The border security would be secondary.
Apparently, Panama charges $82 per container. So you have to get the price under that, including the cost of unloading and loading containers at the two ports.
If you could make it cheaper to get cargo from Asia to Europe, for instance, by unloading the containers in San Diego, shipping them across a pipeline to Corpus Christi, and loading them onto new ships, then you could probably turn a profit with it.
I am not sure if that's possible, especially since the border wall would be circuitous and not really an efficient path. However.. you could build the pipeline in a straight shot, in conjunction with the wall and under the same budget. The money we make from the pipeline could go towards paying for elaborate border security on both borders.
A brief search on maglev rail indicates it costs about $0.07 per ton per mile. So maybe it wouldn't work too well.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Sat Jan 28, 2017 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
The solar panels can charge the electric fence perimeter as well.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Funny, but I'm not sure if they actually can.TheReal_ND wrote:The solar panels can charge the electric fence perimeter as well.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Maybe with a capacitor?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
But then.. I was looking at only the price you pay for passage through the canal. There is the fuel cost to go all that distance as well. It might not be such a bad idea, but I am not sure where to get the data to calculate the costs.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Not sure, I'm just barely getting into in school, but they put out low amps.TheReal_ND wrote:Maybe with a capacitor?
Ah hell. I gotta go find something now.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
If we're talking about a maglev rail powered by the grid being fed by nuclear power, versus a big ass ship plowing through the water and a lot of friction on the power of diesel engines, then yeah, the railway wins.Speaker to Animals wrote:But then.. I was looking at only the price you pay for passage through the canal. There is the fuel cost to go all that distance as well. It might not be such a bad idea, but I am not sure where to get the data to calculate the costs.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
You have the Rio Grande in place already, just dig a canal through the Sonoran desert to El Paso, then widen the Rio Grande down to Brownsville.
Nec Aspera Terrent