Income Inequality

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18741
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Martin Hash » Mon Mar 27, 2017 6:48 am

I don't spend money on things that are meant to impress other people but I still spend as much as I want on the things that give me warm-n-fuzzies, and even though computers don't do that for me anymore, I can remember a time when they did. I always bought a $2K computer, and it was worth it to me. Loved them fuckers.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Fife » Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:06 am

Nobody needs a $2,000 computer.

The computer inequality in this nation is disgusting.

User avatar
SilverEagle
Posts: 2421
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am

Re: Income Inequality

Post by SilverEagle » Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:20 am

SilverEagle wrote:
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:It is all fine and good to talk about boot-strapping gumption, but there is a point where hard work won't make up for the fact you are a natural born cock-sucker in an economy that only values ass-play.

Complain about the unfairness of it all until you are blue in the face, but Hash is right... you got to do something to keep the cock-suckers in line.
Quality of life increases due to technical advancements is their main justification for the rape of the middle and lower classes. Oh but poor people can watch World Cup matches on TV so it's all good! The poor are just like the rich because they can see a World Cup match! :lol: :lol: :lol: That podcast was total crap! We (as a society) have been bought off by gadgets, gizmos, and told by the elites to STFU.

In 1965 the CEO to average worker pay ratio was 65 to 1. It's now 300 to 1. That's all you really need to know about income inequality.
Fife what exactly did you agree with/like about that podcast? To me it was nothing but dismissive of a real issue effecting not only the heart of our society (the middle class) but the survival of our society in general.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.

For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!

:character-bowser: __________ :character-mario: :character-luigi:

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:39 am

Fife wrote:Nobody needs a $2,000 computer.

The computer inequality in this nation is disgusting.

Wrong. We must not allow a PC performance gap.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18741
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Martin Hash » Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:43 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Fife wrote:Nobody needs a $2,000 computer.

The computer inequality in this nation is disgusting.

Wrong. We must not allow a PC performance gap.
How true that is, because if the gap gets too large, all the other brilliant but loser designs die until only Intel remains.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Fife » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:39 am

SilverEagle wrote:Fife what exactly did you agree with/like about that podcast? To me it was nothing but dismissive of a real issue effecting not only the heart of our society (the middle class) but the survival of our society in general.
The "issue" is only "real" to Marxist economists and lo-info media consumers. I rate you higher than that.

Anyway, the guest takes the position that Marxists like Piketty and his crowd have only one metric for "equality:" dollars. Once you accept that fallacy, anything--literally anything--is logically possible. It makes for a great lever for command economy/totalitarian "arguments."

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Fife » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:43 am

SilverEagle wrote:
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:It is all fine and good to talk about boot-strapping gumption, but there is a point where hard work won't make up for the fact you are a natural born cock-sucker in an economy that only values ass-play.

Complain about the unfairness of it all until you are blue in the face, but Hash is right... you got to do something to keep the cock-suckers in line.
Quality of life increases due to technical advancements is their main justification for the rape of the middle and lower classes. Oh but poor people can watch World Cup matches on TV so it's all good! The poor are just like the rich because they can see a World Cup match! :lol: :lol: :lol: That podcast was total crap! We (as a society) have been bought off by gadgets, gizmos, and told by the elites to STFU.

In 1965 the CEO to average worker pay ratio was 65 to 1. It's now 300 to 1. That's all you really need to know about income inequality.
You take a lot for granted. How many generations back do you have to go to find direct ancestors without electricity, clean water, transportation, access to information, &c? Do you think the state drew a line from that generation to your spoiled-brat ass? Or was there some other mysterious factor in play?

User avatar
TheOneX
Posts: 1293
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:16 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by TheOneX » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:44 am

Fife wrote:Nobody needs a $2,000 computer.

The computer inequality in this nation is disgusting.
^^Obviously has never owned a $2k computer.

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Fife » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:50 am

TheOneX wrote:
Fife wrote:Nobody needs a $2,000 computer.

The computer inequality in this nation is disgusting.
^^Obviously has never owned a $2k computer.
By far, the most expensive computer I have ever owned was my 1982 Commodore 64 and the peripherals.

I was obviously taking advantage of the poorest among us when I was buying that with the money I made doing fast food work.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Income Inequality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:51 am

We need to distribute two thousand dollar computers to everybody to even the playing field.

I can't tell you how many times I get wrecked on a game because my computer and/or internet bandwidth is not equal to the other guys. We need social justice now.