Trump Tower Bugged by BHO?

[de officiis]

Too funny.

[clubgop]

Is this an assault tweet?

Are these people serious? Who is shoplifting here? The only people that "hacked" an election with absolute proof is the DNC. They were the ones caught stealing shit. The only thing you caught was the surveillance of the surveillance of the stealing. Congrats I guess.

[C-Mag]

Time to Fire Comey.

He's just a political clown, he has lost all integrity, no integrity, can't run the FBI.

This spying on Trump could get very big. Even Bob Woodward saying the spying on the Trump Team by the Obama Administration may very well be criminal. This is looking more and more like intentional moves by the Obama Administration to illegally spying on candidate Donald Trump and then President Elect Trump, his personal conversations and campaign discussions.

[C-Mag]

This is getting really interesting.

BLUF - There is another 'Snowden', Nunes was coerced into telling the truth about Trump being spied on.

The new 'Snowden' tried to go the route of Whistleblower, got no where with taking the info to Comey.
Comey was supposed to be asked about the new Snowden by Nunes on the 20th
On the 21st Nunes was written a letter by Freedom Watch who is representing the new Snowden
On the 22nd Nunes comes out and vindicates Trump on spying

https://twitter.com/hashtag/Vault7?src=hash

The Letter http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/1703 ... Letter.pdf
The new Snowden is named Montegomery, he says he had 46 Hard Drives of info on illegal Intelligence Community Activity, including
Spying on the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
Tampering with the 2008 Election in Florida
Clapper, Comey and Brennan know about all of it

Should be fun.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

I don't know C... if it is this guy:

A 2010 Playboy Magazine investigation called Montgomery "The man who conned the Pentagon", saying he won millions in federal contracts for his supposed terrorist-exposing intelligence software.[2] The software was later reported to have been an elaborate "hoax" and Montgomery's former lawyer Michael J. Flynn called him a "con artist" and "habitual liar engaged in fraud".[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_L._Montgomery

I am skeptical... it isn't a particularly uncommon name, but how many Dennis Montgomerys do we think are claiming to have information from their time contracting with the CIA,

In June 2014, reporter Stephen Lemons of the Phoenix New Times wrote that Montgomery had been hired by Sheriff Joe Arpaio of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office as a confidential informant.[16] Lemons, citing an anonymous source in the Sheriff's Office, said that Montgomery had claimed that, using data he had obtained while working for the CIA, he could prove there was a conspiracy against Arpaio between the U.S. Department of Justice and G. Murray Snow, the federal judge presiding over a racial-profiling lawsuit filed against Maricopa County. In April 2015, Arpaio confirmed the confidential informant relationship in testimony before Judge Snow.[17] Arpaio later characterized the result of Montgomery's investigation as "junk".[18]

Can we get any more information on the 'Montgomery' from the whistleblower letter?

[ssu]

Nunes was coerced into telling the truth about Trump being spied on.

Or perhaps coerced to throw a fig leaf to the POTUS? Started to be a bit akward as nobody (except Spicer & Conway) were helping Trump's position. (Wasn't Nunes in the Trump transition in the first Place, btw?)

Where's the GCHQ on this, C-Mag?

And the millions of fraudulent voters that voted Hillary? Or where is that major investigation on that vast voter fraud?

I don't know C... if it is this guy:

A 2010 Playboy Magazine investigation called Montgomery "The man who conned the Pentagon", saying he won millions in federal contracts for his supposed terrorist-exposing intelligence software.[2] The software was later reported to have been an elaborate "hoax" and Montgomery's former lawyer Michael J. Flynn called him a "con artist" and "habitual liar engaged in fraud".[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_L._Montgomery

I am skeptical... it isn't a particularly uncommon name, but how many Dennis Montgomerys do we think are claiming to have information from their time contracting with the CIA,

In June 2014, reporter Stephen Lemons of the Phoenix New Times wrote that Montgomery had been hired by Sheriff Joe Arpaio of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office as a confidential informant.[16] Lemons, citing an anonymous source in the Sheriff's Office, said that Montgomery had claimed that, using data he had obtained while working for the CIA, he could prove there was a conspiracy against Arpaio between the U.S. Department of Justice and G. Murray Snow, the federal judge presiding over a racial-profiling lawsuit filed against Maricopa County. In April 2015, Arpaio confirmed the confidential informant relationship in testimony before Judge Snow.[17] Arpaio later characterized the result of Montgomery's investigation as "junk".[18]

Can we get any more information on the 'Montgomery' from the whistleblower letter?

+1

[TheReal_ND]

First I ever heard of this Montgomery character. Going to have to look into it. Where did you here about him from? Reddit?

[TheReal_ND]

Well this weird...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-2 ... vernment-s

[ssu]

Seems likely that it's the same wild conspiracy buff conman, this Montgomery guy. That he stole hard drives, and has similar lurid conspiracies fitting to what people want to hear etc. fits the picture.

Now, let's just wait for Trump's tweet about it.

[C-Mag]

Hanarchy, ssu and ND, yep, looks like the same guy. It will be interesting to see how it develops. I don't know anything about the guy.

Here's the deal with whistleblowers. They are dissatisfied about what is going on around them and that can come from a wide range of motivations from pure loyalty to higher ideals to opportunities for fame and fortune. Probably in most cases it's a mix. With Whistelblowers there is always a personal price to pay for exposing stuff and they usually have something there, and very, very rarely do the senior folks act responsibly to whistleblowers and honestly afford the protections they are supposed to get.

It's generally good for the system to have whistleblowers that expose wrong doing. But they will pay a price, look at Snowden, Manning and Assange. Manning was an easy case, UCMJ, bam. Snowden is still being called a Russian agent, don't know if that's true, and the charges against Assange seem fairly flimsy, but he's still locked in the Ecuadoran Embassy.

Well, we get to watch.