Poll: Who Supports the Idea of a White Ethno State?

[Montegriffo]

Ps Still waiting to find out how white is white enough and where you plan to have your fourth reich....

Still waiting for you to read one of the handful of separate replies I already made to that fallacious nonsense.

Also, the "You don't agree with me so you are literally a Nazi!!!!" argument is totally EDP. Like "literally" EDP. When they put EDP in the dictionary, they are going to use that as an example.

My argument is Eastern Daily Press? I don't understand what you mean by that but
I'll take it as a compliment.
By the way a white supremacist state with no cultural diversity is the dictionary definition of Nazi.

[StCapps]

Everything is about the Eastern Daily Press with this guy. It's like he's jealous that a more catchy acronym caught on or something.

[Speaker to Animals]

Did you not notice there was a discussion going on between two educated people before you two characters showed up and started posting insults? That's the EDP effect.

You're still posting this garbage even after somebody asked to please write an argument for or against, but to just stay on topic. The sad truth is that you probably cannot do it. I already know Monty's max argument level is "You're a Nazi!". You are not far beyond that, apparently. Hell, we only need Kath to come in here and label everybody who doesn't agree with her a child rapist again. It's fucking banal.

You just don't have the intellectual shoe size to shop at this store. You should try the Osh Kosh B'Gosh store.

[StCapps]

Je Sanguinis White Ethno State, fine by me, lots of people in this thread are pro-free association, you aren't the only one, you just want to argue against strawmen.

[Speaker to Animals]

Je Sanguinis White Ethno State, fine by me, you just want to argue against strawmen.

Do you really not understand why that statement does not constitute an argument?

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Apparently, along with the inability to make rational arguments, you cannot read, because that's exactly what he argued. He said that the natural order of the world since the dawn of civilization was the cause of war, and if only we eliminated the ethno-state we can be free from the warfare.

Otherwise, his entire post means nothing. If we still have warfare after the ethno-state is eliminated from the face of the Earth, then what was the point?

Educationally deficient posters really are a hassle. EDPs? Hmm. Maybe need some work on that.

That is a very creative way of reading my arguments. But then, what else would I expect from someone who imagines the world before 1965 was a near perfect Eden of conflict free ethno-states.

That's also a clever way of reading my argument.

I don't believe it was all laughs and bliss before 1965, but most of the problems we actually did have stemmed from what "diversity" we already had saddled ourselves with, so I can't imagine why you'd want to dig up that particular aspect of our history in defense of increasing diversity..

And it seemed to me you attacked the idea of the ethno-state on the basis of incessant warfare. In the context of this discussion, it's implied you intend for multi-racial society to somehow be more peaceful on the global scale -- which isn't that big of an assumption considering it is one of the cornerstones of globalist thinking. Remember when they used to say two nations with MacDonald's never went to war? That one was really clever up until that time we bombed the Mickey D in Belgrade.

But more to the point, given that most of our nation's internal strife stemmed from "diversity", what makes you think you can improve things by increasing "diversity"?

Just paying in kind.

If you mean by 'most of our nation's internal strife stemmed from diversity' that we have had trouble squaring our enlightenment values with a history of enslavement, then you have a very weird way of defining things. I suppose you could say that the Civil War was a 'diversity' problem, but that would be a very idiomatic use of the term.

The point is that diversity comes with humanity because we do not share a hive-mind. Race, culture, and ethnicity are all very slippery categories that are difficult to base laws on, at least if you want to maintain any semblance of a free and open society. If you do not value a free and open society, then we simply have irreconcilable goals for our society, so it is probably a good thing that we live in a society where we can disagree in a civil way about these things.

The "Idea of a White Ethno State" is so ill-defined that it is impossible to support or criticize in a meaningful way.

[StCapps]

Most Americans don't want to live in je sanguinis white ethno state, and the ones who do aren't all going to band together to create one in America, that would be unconstitutional, 14th amendment. Just because people are shooting down your pipe dream doesn't mean they have no argument.

[Montegriffo]

Monte's max argument level is "You're a Nazi!"

''You're a Nazi'' isn't an argument it's a statement of fact.
The argument to support it is here in this thread in nearly every one of your posts. How else do you explain the ramblings of a SIFCLF who says things like ''America was built by white men.'' I showed you Chinese labourers and engineers building the railroad which made America but you ignored that. Millions of black slaves created your wealth and the mongrel mix of cultures which make up American culture are far from ''all white.'' You fail to acknowledge any contributions made by non-whites which shows you up as the white supremacist you clearly are.

[StCapps]

Monte's max argument level is "You're a Nazi!"

''You're a Nazi'' isn't an argument it's a statement of fact.
The argument to support it is here in this thread in nearly every one of your posts. How else do you explain the ramblings of a SIFCLF who says things like ''America was built by white men.'' I showed you Chinese labourers and engineers building the railroad which made America but you ignored that. Millions of black slaves created your wealth and the mongrel mix of cultures which make up American culture are far from ''all white.'' You fail to acknowledge any contributions made by non-whites which shows you up as the white supremacist you clearly are.

To be fair, America was built mostly by white people, you are reaching here Monte. That has become less and less the case over time, but StA never denied that was the case.

[SuburbanFarmer]

This reminds me of the time that SIFCLF to A repeated “exit to Valhalla” or some shit, like 50 times in a thread, trying make it catch on.
Like a short-bus kid desperate to join the jock crowd.