No. I would say that this has more to do with powerful men being allowed to get away with behavior that we all would find horrible and we are finally exposing/dolling out the anger.C-Mag wrote:Random thoughts.......
Liberal women..... pissed their males did not protect them from Trump are now getting rid of their males.
Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All
-
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm
Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All
Why now, why defend them for so long. Why trash women that came out earlier
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All
Average women didn't trash anyone, but there's always going to be those people who deny the obvious for a myriad of reasons. Most harassed women were afraid of losing their jobs. Weinstein was extraordinarily powerful. There's strength in numbers - now it's safe to say what happened.C-Mag wrote:Why now, why defend them for so long. Why trash women that came out earlier
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All
Why are you so desparate to find alternative reasons for the current wave of accusations when the most obvious reason is the changing atsmoshere leading to fewer negative consequences for the accusers?C-Mag wrote:Random thoughts.......
Liberal women..... pissed their males did not protect them from Trump are now getting rid of their males.
Also, many Republicans are facing accusations too.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All
Is it really necessary to use derogatory language when describing victims of crime? It's as if you would rather blame the victims than admit this sort of abuse has been going on for centuries.Speaker to Animals wrote:Alpha thots.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All
Montegriffo wrote:Is it really necessary to use derogatory language when describing victims of crime? It's as if you would rather blame the victims than admit this sort of abuse has been going on for centuries.Speaker to Animals wrote:Alpha thots.
You assume their allegations are all true..
Prior probability puts at least half in the false category.
Of the others, how many just whored themselves out on the casting couch and are now cashing in a second time with this rape hoax hysteria?
Evidence is necessary.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All
I don't assume ALL the accusations are true, I just refuse to dismiss them without proof like you do.Speaker to Animals wrote:Montegriffo wrote:Is it really necessary to use derogatory language when describing victims of crime? It's as if you would rather blame the victims than admit this sort of abuse has been going on for centuries.Speaker to Animals wrote:Alpha thots.
You assume their allegations are all true..
Prior probability puts at least half in the false category.
Of the others, how many just whored themselves out on the casting couch and are now cashing in a second time with this rape hoax hysteria?
Evidence is necessary.
Some of the older cases are going to be very difficult to prove but that does not make them false allegations.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All
Montegriffo wrote:I don't assume ALL the accusations are true, I just refuse to dismiss them without proof like you do.Speaker to Animals wrote:Montegriffo wrote:
Is it really necessary to use derogatory language when describing victims of crime? It's as if you would rather blame the victims than admit this sort of abuse has been going on for centuries.
You assume their allegations are all true..
Prior probability puts at least half in the false category.
Of the others, how many just whored themselves out on the casting couch and are now cashing in a second time with this rape hoax hysteria?
Evidence is necessary.
Some of the older cases are going to be very difficult to prove but that does not make them false allegations.
I am not dismissing anything. I think every single one of these allegations should be thoroughly investigated, and if evidence arises that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the accuser lied, then she should face the legal consequences for that. On the other hand, prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he forceably raped somebody and he should go to prison for a long time.
What I oppose is all this nonsense people are talking about assuming guilt based on nothing more than allegations.
Fact is, women in Hollywood have been whoring themselves out on the proverbial casting couch to get good parts since Hollywood was in its infancy. Did Weinstein offer women parts for a blowjob or whatever? Probably. Apparently its a long tradition in Hollywood, which shouldn't surprise anybody who recognizes that degenerate place for what it is. But is that rape? No.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All
No it's cohersion and abuse of power.
I agree that many of the allegations will not go to court due to lack of evidence. That is not proof that women deliberately chose to have sex with fat ugly men for their own benefit. Nor is it acceptable that women had to prostitute themselves in order to further their careers. It is abuse however you look at it.
I agree that many of the allegations will not go to court due to lack of evidence. That is not proof that women deliberately chose to have sex with fat ugly men for their own benefit. Nor is it acceptable that women had to prostitute themselves in order to further their careers. It is abuse however you look at it.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.