Congressman Steve Scalise (R) shot

[TheReal_ND]

@C-Mag - There ya go. Now find me an MHF leftie that's encouraging violence.

Here ya go, you'll find multiple posts of MHF folks supporting violence.

Yeah, but, so what? That's as American as apple pie and baseball; "come and take this abstract incitement from my cold dead hands, ya fuckin' pansy, cryin' about it is a sign o' weakness".

ABSTRACT INCITEMENT DEATH SQUADS ASSEMBLE

[StCapps]

Apparently all it took to get Americans to go full on Canadian when it comes to free speech is to have the media talk smack about Donald Trump, before that these folks were pro-free speech, but media propaganda against Trump has now changed their mind for some reason. It was fine for the media to lie about politicians they didn't like, but they like Trump so now it's not cool anymore.

[Fife]

Ordinary fucking people are apeshit out of their minds.


https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/06/15 ... -shooting/

[Smitty-48]

You tell me if 10s of millions of Democrats support Hodkinson's Assassination attempt.

What I'm telling you is, Hodgkinson was no radical by modern Democrat standards.

Bloody disruptive of the Queen's Peace, wot? Oh, wait, America doesn't have a Queen, so there's no Queen's Peace to keep. Well, that was easy, problem solved. /shrugs

[StCapps]

You tell me if 10s of millions of Democrats support Hodkinson's Assassination attempt.

What I'm telling you is, Hodgkinson was no radical by modern Democrat standards.

Bloody disruptive of the Queen's Peace, wot? Oh, wait, America doesn't have a Queen, so there's no Queen's Peace to keep. Well, that was easy, problem solved. /shrugs

Choas and Republics, go hand in hand.

[The Conservative]

Actually, not properly covering the riots and giving accreditation to the rioters for doing what they were doing, (burning buildings, destroying cars, and storefronts, etc) instead of condoning it as any sane and normal person would, it is inciting by proxy.

I see no giving accreditation to the rioters. I see journalists trying to explain why they rioted and putting their biased anti-Trump spin on it. That's not illegal.

Just as a getaway driver is guilty of someone one of the robbers murdered, they can't be tried as first-degree murder, but second, they can. So yeah, the media is guilty by association.

Guilt by association bullshit. Is Trump responsible for his words inspiring the idiotic actions of some his supporters? No, then neither is the media responsible for the actions taken by nutjobs. The media is not a getaway driver, you compare apples to oranges, in order to try and make the square peg fit in the round hole.

No, they aren't? Really? So all these passes they gave Clinton, but aren't giving to Trump... ok, I see... you just want your chocolate covered bullshit and want to call it a tootsie roll... just to make you feel better...

The press has power the to influence... and they have done just that, they should be held accountable for what happened.

[Smitty-48]

ABSTRACT INCITEMENT DEATH SQUADS ASSEMBLE

Brandenberg v. Ohio is one of my favourite American things, no exaggeration to call it one of the greatest acts of American jurisprudence in the history of the republic, let abstract incitement ring, if some folks gets killed, oh well, price of liberty that is, America wasn't founded by voting, some muthahfuckahs had to get shot to get this thing done, who knew?

[StCapps]

No, they aren't? Really? So all these passes they gave Clinton, but aren't giving to Trump... ok, I see... you just want your chocolate covered bullshit and want to call it a tootsie roll... just to make you feel better...

The press has power the to influence... and they have done just that, they should be held accountable for what happened.

Accountable when it comes to their credibility, sure. Accountable when it comes to legal repercussions, not a chance. Ethically the media are in the wrong, but not legally, there is a difference, and it's an important one.

[Smitty-48]

You tell me if 10s of millions of Democrats support Hodkinson's Assassination attempt.

What I'm telling you is, Hodgkinson was no radical by modern Democrat standards.

Bloody disruptive of the Queen's Peace, wot? Oh, wait, America doesn't have a Queen, so there's no Queen's Peace to keep. Well, that was easy, problem solved. /shrugs

Choas and Republics, go hand in hand.

Revolutionary republic to boot, eh wot? Says so right on the label;

"voting may not actually get this shit done, keep those rifles handy, fellas"

[SuburbanFarmer]

Here ya go, you'll find multiple posts of MHF folks supporting violence.
viewtopic.php?f=63&t=1648&hilit=degenerate

121 pages.. yeah.. I'll get right on that. Let me know when you spot one.

EDIT: I've read a lot of that thread, and never seen a leftie supporting violence. Lots of righties clamoring for more "street justice", no lefties.

Yeah, Lefties said the Free Speech guys that showed up at Berkeley deserved a beat down and they should have known better than showing up.

I recall saying that they were provoking the situation, and should have known better. I provided evidence for this, and took a lot of heat. Never once did I say that the violence was justified - only that they walked into that situation either to provoke violence, or because they were fucking stupid.

I don't recall anyone joining me on that side of the debate, and certainly nobody saying that the violence was a good thing.