No one is really arguing that they shouldn't be allowed.Speaker to Animals wrote:I am really trying to wrap my mind around this:
(1) Free association should be respected as a fundamental human right.
(2) White ethno-states should not be allowed.
Somebody please explain that one.
In StA's mind though everyone in thread who disagrees with him is saying that a White Ethno State shouldn't be allowed under any circumstances. In his delusion, he's the lone defender of freedom of association in the entire thread and all who disagree with him clearly don't hold those values, Virtue Signaling Faggot that he is.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:No one is really arguing that they shouldn't be allowed.
So, the ethno part simply means the same as the natio part in the word nation? A people/tribe/"born of"?Speaker to Animals wrote:BjornP wrote:Is "Ethno State" supposed to mean something different than "nation state"? If so, what?
Well, at one time, it didn't mean anything different. But people created a new entity: the Marxist Utopian State. Or the Bonobo Masturbation Society. Lots of people named it, but none of them reflect well on those defending it. I was sort of waiting for them to define it.
Hmmm... I do vote Social Democrat, love the monarchy, and want to preserve what little's left of Danish culture...heydaralon wrote:Bjorn is the biggest Nazi of all. Quite a hateful person. Really ruins the forum experience.
AND I can get angry sometimes. I check all the boxes! I am a Nazi! I. AM. ILLEGAAAAAL! 
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:The default state of affairs for thousands of years was near constant conflict, autocratic states, and civil strife.Speaker to Animals wrote:Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
You clearly don't understand my point because I am not arguing against the 'very idea of a white ethno-state anywhere.' I am arguing that ethno-states, in general, are impractical, restrictive, and don't solve any actual problems. Some abstract, pie-in-the-sky idea about an ill-defined area where similar people live does not an ethno-state make.
To make it a state, it would require laws. To make it an ethno-state would require laws that restrict association by definition. Furthermore, the principles of an ethno-state practically ensure it will be in conflict with her neighbors. The only way around this is having some larger system that maintains peace between these proposed states, which pretty much eliminates the ethno part of the ethno-state don't it. Looks a lot like what we currently have, in fact. You are free to live in a whiter part of America if you think that is an important component to a quality life.
Japan is a great example of an ethno state (suspect as that definition is) not working, since they are currently doing everything they can to bring people into their economy to support their ageing population. This includes promoting immigration.
Dude, what??
Ethno-states were the default state of affairs for thousands of years. They work just fine. The problem, as we are seeing again, is that the so-called "multicultural" states do NOT work out. We are turning the entire western world into the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and it's set to collapse soon. It's not working, dude. Do you not read the papers? Do you not see and hear these people constantly bitching about how horrible it is to live in a white patriarchal hell hole that is America? Have you noticed people protesting and shitting all over fallen soldiers at football games because black criminals got shot somewhere?
THIS. DOES. NOT. WORK.
I don't take the complaints of some of the most well off sections of the global 1% bitching in Salon as seriously as you do. Nor do I fantasize about a lost imaginary Eden of imaginary ethno-states free of strife.
THIS.IS.WORKING.FINE.
Internet drama is a clear indication that the sky is falling, get with the SIFCLF program.heydaralon wrote:I believe that by 2020 the internet will be "drama-free." That's why I always put on facebook that I don't want any drama and I don't associate with people who cause drama to let people know that I am not to be trifled with.
Who coined that term? I've seen Smitty use it quite a bit, is that a term that exists outside of MHF?StCapps wrote:Internet drama is a clear indication that the sky is falling, get with the SIFCLF program.heydaralon wrote:I believe that by 2020 the internet will be "drama-free." That's why I always put on facebook that I don't want any drama and I don't associate with people who cause drama to let people know that I am not to be trifled with.
Absolution Style by Premium phpBB Styles
