Civil War Doomsday Clock

[StCapps]

SJWs are simply Marxism applied to culture instead of economics, the oppressor vs oppressed zero-sum game narrative remains the centerpiece of both. Zlaxer and StA are Right Wing SJWs, with a "if you can't beat them, join them" attitude, when the Left Wing SJWs are totally beatable and self sabotaging with an obvious losing strategy.

The SJWs eat their own, whether left or right wing, but they think it's winning, bunch of clowns.


We quick to say, it's just the game that's dealt, that gave you that rope, so you can hang yourself.

[Speaker to Animals]

You really are one stupid individual, capps.

To claim that racial groups do not possess their own unique self-interests is fucking absurd. You have no arguments either. You just make asinine claims and refuse to defend any of this.

You probably donate money to Ben Shapiro.

[StCapps]

You really are one stupid individual, capps.

To claim that racial groups do not possess their own unique self-interests is fucking absurd. You have no arguments either. You just make asinine claims and refuse to defend any of this.

What about their race gives them unique self-interests that aren't shared by any other racial group? Talk about asinine claims.

I have defended my claims, you are the one refusing to defend your assertions, not me Captain Projection.

[Speaker to Animals]

You really are one stupid individual, capps.

To claim that racial groups do not possess their own unique self-interests is fucking absurd. You have no arguments either. You just make asinine claims and refuse to defend any of this.

What about their race gives them unique self-interests that aren't shared by any other racial group? Talk about asinine claims.

It is in the self-interest of the Latino race in general to keep the borders open and chain migration in force.

It is NOT in the self-interest of the white Americans who actually built this country to keep open border and have chain migration of any kind.

That is two conflicting interests of those racial groups. There exist outliers within those groups who might not fit (like some almond farmer who wants cheap illegal labor to get richer by killing the American people), but those interests are almost never legitimately good.

[StCapps]

You really are one stupid individual, capps.

To claim that racial groups do not possess their own unique self-interests is fucking absurd. You have no arguments either. You just make asinine claims and refuse to defend any of this.

What about their race gives them unique self-interests that aren't shared by any other racial group? Talk about asinine claims.

It is in the self-interest of the Latino race in general to keep the borders open and chain migration in force.

It is NOT in the self-interest of the white Americans who actually built this country to keep open border and have chain migration of any kind.

That is two conflicting interests of those racial groups. There exist outliers within those groups who might not fit (like some almond farmer who wants cheap illegal labor to get richer by killing the American people), but those interests are almost never legitimately good.

It is not in the interests of Latino race to keep borders open. Many of them might think it's in their interests, that doesn't make it true. Plenty of Latino's do not support illegal immigration, but you want to make it seem like it's in the interests of the entire race to support it, when that makes no fucking sense. Self-interest isn't race based faggot.

[Speaker to Animals]

What about their race gives them unique self-interests that aren't shared by any other racial group? Talk about asinine claims.

It is in the self-interest of the Latino race in general to keep the borders open and chain migration in force.

It is NOT in the self-interest of the white Americans who actually built this country to keep open border and have chain migration of any kind.

That is two conflicting interests of those racial groups. There exist outliers within those groups who might not fit (like some almond farmer who wants cheap illegal labor to get richer by killing the American people), but those interests are almost never legitimately good.

It is not in the interests of Latino race to keep borders open. Many of them might think it's in their interests, that doesn't make it true. Plenty of Latino's do not support illegal immigration, but you want to make it seem like it's in the interests of the entire race to support it, when that makes no fucking sense. Self-interest isn't race based faggot.

It's not in the interest of Latinos to expand their power over America? Do tell. Back up your point. Because it is self-evident to those of us with at least average IQ why it is precisely in their interest to do this (which is why they keep voting for it).

[StCapps]

It's not in the interest of Latinos to expand their power over America? Do tell. Back up your point. Because it is self-evident to those of us with at least average IQ why it is precisely in their interest to do this (which is why they keep voting for it).

They keep voting for it, because they don't know what is their own best interests, and neither do most people of any race. Illegal immigrants expanding their power in America hurts legal latino immigrants, and in 2000, 44% of them voted Republican. Just because the Democrats have done well with Latino's over the last few elections doesn't make them a monolith who support illegal immigration. They can be flipped eventually, or at least split, it wasn't even all that long ago that they did split their vote to a significant degree.

[Speaker to Animals]

It's not in the interest of Latinos to expand their power over America? Do tell. Back up your point. Because it is self-evident to those of us with at least average IQ why it is precisely in their interest to do this (which is why they keep voting for it).

They keep voting for it, because they don't know what is their own best interests, and neither do most people of any race. Illegal immigrants expanding their power in America hurts legal latino immigrants, and in 2000, 44% of them voted Republican. Just because the Democrats have done well with Latino's over the last few elections doesn't make them a monolith who support illegal immigration.

You just keep repeating this assertion without defending it. DEFEND IT. Unpack that shit so you can hopefully see how retarded it really is.

Your big problem with critical thought is that you just repeat these slogans you hear from people like Ben Shapiro without actually unpacking them and trying to defend them.

How does chain migration not benefit Latinos??

[StCapps]

It's not in the interest of Latinos to expand their power over America? Do tell. Back up your point. Because it is self-evident to those of us with at least average IQ why it is precisely in their interest to do this (which is why they keep voting for it).

They keep voting for it, because they don't know what is their own best interests, and neither do most people of any race. Illegal immigrants expanding their power in America hurts legal latino immigrants, and in 2000, 44% of them voted Republican. Just because the Democrats have done well with Latino's over the last few elections doesn't make them a monolith who support illegal immigration.

You just keep repeating this assertion without defending it. DEFEND IT. Unpack that shit so you can hopefully see how retarded it really is.

You keep repeating your assertions without defending it. I have defended these assertions, far more than you defend yours, and until you start engaging in good faith, I have gone far enough. Go look at the election results from 2000, and see how 44% of latinos voted Republican, go look at history of how blacks have voted in presidential elections, and see how Blacks used to vote predominantly Republican, then split their vote, and now predominantly support Democrats.

Your assertions that they are monolithic groups with the same interests that oppose the interests of other races has zero substantiation. It's an idiotic theory pushed by someone who thinks genetics are far more of a factor in voting patterns and policy preferences than they really are.

[Speaker to Animals]

They keep voting for it, because they don't know what is their own best interests, and neither do most people of any race. Illegal immigrants expanding their power in America hurts legal latino immigrants, and in 2000, 44% of them voted Republican. Just because the Democrats have done well with Latino's over the last few elections doesn't make them a monolith who support illegal immigration.

You just keep repeating this assertion without defending it. DEFEND IT. Unpack that shit so you can hopefully see how retarded it really is.

You keep repeating your assertions without defending it. I have defended these assertions, far more than you defend yours, and until you start engaging in good faith, I have gone far enough. Go look at the election results from 2000, and see how 44% of latinos voted Republican, go see how Blacks used to vote predominantly Republican, then split their vote, and now predominantly support Democrats.

Your assertions that they are monolithic groups with the same interests that oppose the interests of other races has zero substantiation.

You never defend a damned thing. Your MO in this place is to make retarded blanket statements as some kind of rebuttal to another poster's argument (which they make in good faith), refuse to defend your blanket statements, and then drag the thread on for pages and pages with more nonsense. You are kind of a stain on this community because of it.


I have showed you multiple examples of racial interests being in conflict, which well justifies identity politics. We have seen numerous examples of how identity politics has helped minorities to the detriment of whites. All you did was say "identity politics hurts minorities too" and did jackshit to defend that dumbass statement.

Either you are an elaborate decades-long troll are just a low-IQ person who has trouble reasoning.