The Tweet is Undefendable

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: The Tweet is Undefendable

Post by clubgop » Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:47 pm

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:Things I learned on the MHF today:

1) Investigative journalism is exactly the same as personal doxxing.

2) When it comes to doxxing, leftist arguments about 'punching up' and 'power imbalances' get applied by the right.
Investigative journalism is this? Tracking down some fucker on Reddit? What if they suck at it? What if they got the wrong guy?

https://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/ ... .xmlx1K0jQ

http://hotair.com/archives/2017/07/05/c ... tling-gif/

Is this is what is left of investigative journalism? Track down who said some shit we don't like? Or is that all journalism ever was?

As for 2, well. George Patton said it best.


User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: The Tweet is Undefendable

Post by clubgop » Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:52 pm

pineapplemike wrote:just stumbled across http://www.reddit.com/r/cnnmemes, did this one get posted yet? might as well throw it on the pile

Image
For the bubble hack bitches and undercover hacks like GCF, Kath, and Penner, the next time they want to go on about how "corporations aren't people" this needs to be thrown back in their faces how they acted like aggrieved victims because someone displayed a joke depicting a corporate logo.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: The Tweet is Undefendable

Post by DBTrek » Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:12 pm

clubgop wrote:Is this is what is left of investigative journalism? Track down who said some shit we don't like? Or is that all journalism ever was?
There's a question that probably deserves its own thread.

As the National Review article puts it:
It initially struck me as strange that CNN, “The Most Trusted Name in News,” would devote resources to unmasking some troll, when millions more of them exist, dwelling in caves throughout cyberspace. It’s the equivalent of studying the family tree of one of the mice that live in my walls — who cares?

. . . Thus, Kaczynski decided to embark on a mission to identify this filthy prole. Like an overzealous college resident adviser who smells marijuana emanating from the woods, he decided that someone needed to pay for these broken rules — that justice must be served. Except instead of a meeting with the school disciplinary board, the man behind these tasteless Internet posts would be threatened with a life of perpetual unemployment and total shame. . .

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... tling-meme
One incident does not define an industry, but I'm hard pressed to think of any recent investigative journalism that hasn't been some extension of an exercise in trying to punishing one's enemies. In business there's a trap that failed CEOs often fall into when trying to push for an acquisition. A good CEO will cautiously read the fundamentals of another business and search for corporate synergies that might justify paying takeover prices. Bad CEOs will decide upfront they want to takeover company ''X", then ignore any data indicating that doing so might be a bad idea. Call it confirmation bias at the corporate level.

Seems like today's media companies are suffering from the same tunnel vision. They have their worldview, they have their narrative, and they will relentlessly pursue whatever course they believe strengthens that narrative even to the point of national embarrassment. And, like bad CEOs, when their actions ultimately result in failure and embarrassment they're completely gobsmacked as to how everything fell apart.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: The Tweet is Undefendable

Post by pineapplemike » Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:13 pm

clubgop wrote:For the bubble hack bitches and undercover hacks like GCF, Kath, and Penner, the next time they want to go on about how "corporations aren't people" this needs to be thrown back in their faces how they acted like aggrieved victims because someone displayed a joke depicting a corporate logo.
^ Now that's an interesting take on this whole fiasco I hadn't considered. Worthy of making it to Martin's Quotes Page I reckon

(maybe without doxing GCF, Kath and Penner to his FB followers though)

Also gotta mention that 'undercover hack bitch' has infiltrated my mental dialogue and I find myself repeating it in my mind when arguing with undercover hack bitches outside of the MHF

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: The Tweet is Undefendable

Post by TheReal_ND » Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:20 pm

DBTrek wrote:
clubgop wrote:Is this is what is left of investigative journalism? Track down who said some shit we don't like? Or is that all journalism ever was?
There's a question that probably deserves its own thread.

As the National Review article puts it:
It initially struck me as strange that CNN, “The Most Trusted Name in News,” would devote resources to unmasking some troll, when millions more of them exist, dwelling in caves throughout cyberspace. It’s the equivalent of studying the family tree of one of the mice that live in my walls — who cares?

. . . Thus, Kaczynski decided to embark on a mission to identify this filthy prole. Like an overzealous college resident adviser who smells marijuana emanating from the woods, he decided that someone needed to pay for these broken rules — that justice must be served. Except instead of a meeting with the school disciplinary board, the man behind these tasteless Internet posts would be threatened with a life of perpetual unemployment and total shame. . .

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... tling-meme
One incident does not define an industry, but I'm hard pressed to think of any recent investigative journalism that hasn't been some extension of an exercise in trying to punishing one's enemies. In business there's a trap that failed CEOs often fall into when trying to push for an acquisition. A good CEO will cautiously read the fundamentals of another business and search for corporate synergies that might justify paying takeover prices. Bad CEOs will decide upfront they want to takeover company ''X", then ignore any data indicating that doing so might be a bad idea. Call it confirmation bias at the corporate level.

Seems like today's media companies are suffering from the same tunnel vision. They have their worldview, they have their narrative, and they will relentlessly pursue whatever course they believe strengthens that narrative even to the point of national embarrassment. And, like bad CEOs, when their actions ultimately result in failure and embarrassment they're completely gobsmacked as to how everything fell apart.
NRO posting

Holy fuck show your age much? The fringe right has been at war with them for years and they have been reduced to begging for donations now after telling white working class people should just die already.

Nobody click this shit. It's literally the Bill Kristol of neocon publications and needs to die in a trucking.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: The Tweet is Undefendable

Post by DBTrek » Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:05 pm

The fringe right has been at war with everyone. That's why they are and remain useless as teats on a bull. The only thing they're good at is serving as useful idiots for the left anytime they want to malign the non-fringe right. Kinda like this thread has demonstrated. They're great at reducing victories already in hand.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: The Tweet is Undefendable

Post by TheReal_ND » Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:11 pm

Your opinion is worth a response.

I can see what you mean. I also ask that people try and see what I'm getting at. Honestly, you never will and I can respect that. I'm not your friend. BBQ another Trump hat cuck.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: The Tweet is Undefendable

Post by DBTrek » Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:15 pm

Please, do lecture us on worthy sources, DailyStormer clown.
When we need to know what type of paracord you prefer when crafting nooses we'll chuck a pebble at your crusty-ass econovan.
Until then why don't you down another tumbler of Fireball and get back to sounding your way through the Turner Diaries.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: The Tweet is Undefendable

Post by C-Mag » Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:18 pm

clubgop wrote:This also hasn't stopped the memeing.



How is this chilling the 1A? Is this violence against CNN?

I love this shit.

:lol:
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: The Tweet is Undefendable

Post by TheReal_ND » Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:32 pm

DBTrek wrote:Please, do lecture us on worthy sources, DailyStormer clown.
When we need to know what type of paracord you prefer when crafting nooses we'll chuck a pebble at your crusty-ass econovan.
Until then why don't you down another tumbler of Fireball and get back to sounding your way through the Turner Diaries.