Speaker to Animals wrote:It's consistent with progressive ideology. If women have the ultimate decision-making privilege of life and death for their children, and euthanasia is just a right, then they did nothing wrong.
What really is wrong here to a progressive other than the age of the children the women killed? There doesn't seem to be any rational dividing line between humans that women should be able to kill (and we have to pay for it) and when it's murder. Kill the baby in the womb and it's okay, but if the baby passes through the vagina still alive killing her is murder!
This is the consequence of degeneracy.
So a very very very late ten abortion of 6 kids? That they didn't even actually give birth to?
Yeah, nothing to see here... They were just "executing" their right to "choose" as women.
Speaker to Animals wrote:It's consistent with progressive ideology. If women have the ultimate decision-making privilege of life and death for their children, and euthanasia is just a right, then they did nothing wrong.
What really is wrong here to a progressive other than the age of the children the women killed? There doesn't seem to be any rational dividing line between humans that women should be able to kill (and we have to pay for it) and when it's murder. Kill the baby in the womb and it's okay, but if the baby passes through the vagina still alive killing her is murder!
This is the consequence of degeneracy.
So a very very very late ten abortion of 6 kids? That they didn't even actually give birth to?
Yeah, nothing to see here... They were just "executing" their right to "choose" as women.
Late Term Abortion................ nothing to see here.
Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, it's very profitable to PP too.
PP profits from condom sales?
Yep. Sex education results in more pregnancies which results in more business for abortions and body parts. Which is why they go out of their way to push it.
Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, it's very profitable to PP too.
PP profits from condom sales?
Yep. Sex education results in more pregnancies which results in more business for abortions and body parts. Which is why they go out of their way to push it.
Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, it's very profitable to PP too.
PP profits from condom sales?
Yep. Sex education results in more pregnancies which results in more business for abortions and body parts. Which is why they go out of their way to push it.
You mean Abstinence only sex education results in more pregnancies.
In a longitudinal, unadjusted model, our findings provide evidence that increased sexuality education within school curricula is associated with lower adolescent birthrates (average sexuality education topics β=−0.61; P=.001). However, the effect of sexuality education disappeared when taking into consideration the demographic characteristics, religiosity, and abortion policies of the state (average sexuality education topics β=−0.12; P=.26). States with higher religiosity rankings and greater political conservatism had higher adolescent birthrates.
I wonder if the more conservative and religious states put a greater emphasis on "abstinence only education" with less focus on actual, you know, education.
