When the opposition thinks they win by having no argument, even repeating your best material is enough to win without even breaking a sweat. Try showing up next time, your worst material and/or no material is not going to cut it against me, y'all should know better by now.BjornP wrote:During these last eight (?) years we've all known you, Capps, excatly how many times have you been succesful in actually winning an argument by just repeating yourself ad nauseaum? You figure this time will be different because the forum's smaller?StCapps wrote:People don't like Kath as moderator, because she is a censorship cunt, on a forum that doesn't take kindly to censorship by moderators who refuse to consistently enforce the rules, makes up rules on a whim where there has been no rule before, and then doesn't care to enforce these arbitrary rules on another whim any other time the same shit happens. Who knew?
Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
That made no sense. Probably need to post it five more times. In a mirror.StCapps wrote:When the opposition thinks they win by having no argument, even repeating yourself is enough to win. Show up next time, step your game up fag.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I would like Moderator status. I would let the rules of the market dictate my moderation. This would ensure a sort of raw darwinian fairness. Each time a posting flame war begins, the opposing posters will bid for my moderation. The poster that bids the highest gets my support, and I will moderate and delete their opponents posts. If we do it this way, everyone wins, and the best arguments will naturally proliferate, raising the forum discourse. I'm not out of line thinking that this place really went into the toilet lately with all the name calling and profanity. We really shouldn't be using swear words online. I don't want to be around that, and as a moderator I would remove them, unless of course I was paid a fee to keep them up. Give me a shot, and you won't regret it. I'm serious.
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I'm sorry, I have handed out all of my copies of the MHF Moderator applications. Send a PM to Martin, I think he has extras.heydaralon wrote:I would like Moderator status. I would let the rules of the market dictate my moderation. This would ensure a sort of raw darwinian fairness. Each time a posting flame war begins, the opposing posters will bid for my moderation. The poster that bids the highest gets my support, and I will moderate and delete their opponents posts. If we do it this way, everyone wins, and the best arguments will naturally proliferate, raising the forum discourse. I'm not out of line thinking that this place really went into the toilet lately with all the name calling and profanity. We really shouldn't be using swear words online. I don't want to be around that, and as a moderator I would remove them, unless of course I was paid a fee to keep them up. Give me a shot, and you won't regret it. I'm serious.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
- Location: suiþiuþu
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I’m gone for a couple of hours.
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna
Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Censhorship Cunt, Captain. That's what happened.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
[quote
Kath has a lady boner for my prose and wishes it to herself. That is the takeaway here. Censorship is the sincerest form of flattery.Kath wrote:Really, it's just the graphic stuff. Clubby can be.... quite detailed.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Kath and clubby sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G, lulz
*yip*
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
That means Monte is Oedipus!StCapps wrote:Kath and clubby sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G, lulz
This whole time I had it wrong, Monte wasn't fucking children. Monte is a child who wants to pork his mom. He mistakes the dotting sympathetic affection she gives for romantic love. Me and my way with words are getting in the way of his sick fantasy. So I must be censored. It totally makes sense.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I would never be so rude as to mention a lady's age but I believe Kath is younger than me.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.