pineapplemike wrote: Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:19 pm
seems like the case being made in here is that with our expansionist monetary policy, only the rich have money anyway
It isn't the monetary expansion itself that causes inequality, its that it's being loaned to banks, ie "the wealthy" for nearly nothing to allow them to invest and then get taxed on their gains less than a worker. This is part of what is driving up investment asset prices. If the "created money" were instead used to pay for roads, a "moon shot" carbon free energy program, or even a space colony, then it would be at least passing thorough the pockets of workers before it lands in the wallets of the rich.
StA said:
Why would I care if we spend out way our of another depression? It worked last time. I just don't want to do it in a way that involves millions of people getting killed.
Sensible stuff. Tell that to Smitty whose philosophy is what's good for Lockheed Martin is good for everyone, especially him.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND