Prosecute Julian Assange ("I love Wikileaks!")

[Montegriffo]

It's more lugenpresse lies, Monty. The story is already collapsing and Guardian is already in CYA mode. It's really amazing that you keep going back to that poisoned well again and again and again only to get the runs every single time.

Maybe Guardian can finally track down Elvis for us next.

If you can find more than half a dozen times that I've linked a Guardian political ed op I'll be amazed.

I don't particularly like the Guardian, too Champagne Socialist for me and they are too fond of the Corbinosaurus.
I don't like The Telegraph either, too much of a Torygraph.
I recognise that both have decent journalistic standards compared to blog sites trawling the internet looking for some story to misrepresent and get outraged about though.

[Speaker to Animals]

It's more lugenpresse lies, Monty. The story is already collapsing and Guardian is already in CYA mode. It's really amazing that you keep going back to that poisoned well again and again and again only to get the runs every single time.

Maybe Guardian can finally track down Elvis for us next.

If you can find more than half a dozen times that I've linked a Guardian political ed op I'll be amazed.

I don't particularly like the Guardian, too Champagne Socialist for me and they are too fond of the Corbinosaurus.
I don't like The Telegraph either, too much of a Torygraph.
I recognise that both have decent journalistic standards compared to blog sites trawling the internet looking for some story to misrepresent and get outraged about though.

More fallacies. You are right here defending this garbage, evidence-free article. I don't need to provide anything else. Look at yourself. You are defending this! LOL

[Montegriffo]

It's more lugenpresse lies, Monty. The story is already collapsing and Guardian is already in CYA mode. It's really amazing that you keep going back to that poisoned well again and again and again only to get the runs every single time.

Maybe Guardian can finally track down Elvis for us next.

If you can find more than half a dozen times that I've linked a Guardian political ed op I'll be amazed.

I don't particularly like the Guardian, too Champagne Socialist for me and they are too fond of the Corbinosaurus.
I don't like The Telegraph either, too much of a Torygraph.
I recognise that both have decent journalistic standards compared to blog sites trawling the internet looking for some story to misrepresent and get outraged about though.

More fallacies. You are right here defending this garbage, evidence-free article. I don't need to provide anything else. Look at yourself. You are defending this! LOL

Not even mentioned the article.
I was commenting on your dismissal of the Guardian followed in quick order with a link to Gateway Pundit who I have shown to have completely fabricated a story about 70% Muslim prison population and the home secretary ordering Yaxley-Lennon's transfer there.

[pineapplemike]

who cares, the gateway pundit article was weak anyway, greenwald had a more in-depth analysis

[pineapplemike]

@ggreenwald
7/ In less than 48 hours, we went from "MANAFORT SECRETLY MET WITH ASSANGE 3 TIMES IN THE EMBASSY" (Guardian) to "MAYBE THE RUSSIANS TRICKED THE GUARDIAN INTO PUBLISHING A FALSE STORY" (Politico's CIA writer). Next: why do people not trust news outlets??? It's so unfair

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story ... nge-222694
By Alex Finley*
*Alex Finley is the pen name of a former CIA officer

A bombshell report in the Guardian yesterday claims Paul Manafort, President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman, met directly with Julian Assange, the head of WikiLeaks, several times in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.

If true, the ramifications are immense. It means the guy running Trump’s campaign met directly with the head of the organization that served as a tool of Russia’s intelligence services, distributing stolen Democratic emails in an effort to influence the U.S. presidential election. It could be the proverbial smoking gun that shows Trump’s campaign knew it was receiving help from Russian intelligence services and perhaps even aided the operation.

Luke Harding and Dan Collyns, the reporters behind the Guardian story, do not name their sources, although they claim to have multiple, and they write that they have seen an internal document from Ecuador’s intelligence service listing “Paul Manaford [sic]” as a visitor to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.

While the immediate reaction to the story was a collective “Wow!”, it is fair to take a step back and remain wary. Rather than being the bombshell smoking gun that directly connects the Trump campaign to WikiLeaks, perhaps the report is something else entirely: a disinformation campaign. Is it possible someone planted this story as a means to discredit the journalists?

A number of parties in the Trump-Russia! circus have an interest in discrediting the media. Russia!! President Vladimir Putin has solidified his power in Russia!!! by systematically quashing the free press and controlling the message through friendly media outlets, including the likes of RT and Sputnik. Trump, too, has consistently shouted “Fake News!” at any story he doesn’t like and has made it a theme of late to refer to the media as “the enemy of the people,” a term that has been used by dictators throughout time, including to devastating effect by Joseph Stalin.

Harding is likely a major target for anyone wrapped up in Russia’s intelligence operation against the West’s democratic institutions.

it was those fucking russians again!!!

[pineapplemike]

Manafort/Assange Drama Proves Media Will Buy Any Russia Conspiracy Story, No Matter Its Flaws
http://thefederalist.com/2018/11/28/man ... Z-Q.reddit
...
Let’s look at how people who present themselves as newsmen or thoughtful pundits handled this extremely unverified story.

Here’s Ken “FusionKen” Dilanian, NBC’s “intelligence and national security reporter.” He’s one of the journalists known for uncritically publishing Russia conspiracy theories:



John Harwood, who claims to “cover” politics for CNBC, was convinced by the story:

2016: https://freebeacon.com/politics/wikilea ... -campaign/
Leaked emails released Tuesday by WikiLeaks show a cozy relationship between CNBC anchor and New York Times writer John Harwood and members of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Harwood emailed Podesta last year in May alerting him to watch out for Ben Carson’s campaign.

"Ben Carson could give you real trouble in a general," Harwood wrote in the email, included links to interviews that he had done with Carson.

Podesta passed the email along to Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton’s communications director. "Fascinating stuff," she replied.

[Speaker to Animals]

Bullshit. They didn't fall for anything. They made the entire thing up. The damage is done. The NPCs are going to be repeating this for years now as if it's fact.

[Speaker to Animals]

Already exposed as a lie.

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2018 ... ialnetwork

This is why people who still possess some agency distrust the MSM so completely.

[C-Mag]

Is Assange dropping his information ?

Julian Assange's Christmas Present
Wikileaks most likely transferred (gifted) very sensitive material to President Trump. What is curious is that they stated they were gifting Hillary Clinton a CryptoKitty as well, which would be quite humorous if it was an exact duplicate, being as she is already privy to the information and much of it is likely incriminating evidence against her and her corrupt cronies. It is also quite genius of Julian Assange and the Wikileaks team.


These unique CryptoKitties are valued at several thousand dollars, meaning that President Trump will have to declare Wikileaks’ gift under 5 U.S.C. § 7432 and regulation GSA FMR B-41. Trump’s Tender Tabby will become federal property to be enjoyed by future presidents via custodians at the US National Archives.
https://freedomoutpost.com/julian-assan ... s-present/

[C-Mag]

Bradley Manning is going to jail for refusing to testify about Wikileaks

Manning, the former Army intelligence analyst who spent four years in prison for providing information to WikiLeaks, was jailed Friday after she refused to testify before a grand jury investigating the anti-secrecy group.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/wor ... 103289002/

I'm skeptical.
What are the odds Manning just wants to be prison raped again.