Dankula Weighs in on Being Convicted for His Dog’s Politics
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Dankula Weighs in on Being Convicted for His Dog’s Politics
Well, if violent "unheading and unhorsing" is the what you're talking about, then even our Trotskyists (who don't have their own party anymore, but joined up with a far-left Socialist alliance party called "Unity List"), don't qualify. They call for a popular vote to abolish the monarchy (or at least they do know). That would require a constitutional change, though, and they need to get parliamentary approval for such a vote, for which there is none. And even if they did get the votes, 76% according to latest poll still prefer Denmark to remain a monarchy.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Dankula Weighs in on Being Convicted for His Dog’s Politics
Well, Danes are a bunch of flower children living under the protection of the Anglo-American nuclear deterrent, so Denmark can afford to be a frivolous hippie commune within that paradigm, but I would submit, the Anglo-American nuclear deterrent would not actually brook Communism, and it wouldn't have to come anywhere close to violence, you're not actually within your rights to overthrow the British Crown nor the American Constitution, by voting, neither America nor Britain is a Democracy, and absolutely there are parties and platforms which are unacceptable as the executive, and rightly so.
To wit, no, you can't vote the Commies in, and yes, we will hang you from the yardarm if you try.
To wit, no, you can't vote the Commies in, and yes, we will hang you from the yardarm if you try.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Dankula Weighs in on Being Convicted for His Dog’s Politics
Case in point; what violence did Ethel Rosenberg ever commit? Answer; none.
Technically, she didn't even commit treason, she simply hung out at the meetings and then refused to name names after.
Resolution? The yardarm; ZAP!
Did the republic fall as a result? Nope, sun came up the next day, business as usual.
Technically, she didn't even commit treason, she simply hung out at the meetings and then refused to name names after.
Resolution? The yardarm; ZAP!
Did the republic fall as a result? Nope, sun came up the next day, business as usual.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Dankula Weighs in on Being Convicted for His Dog’s Politics
Well, if everyone voted for the Unity List here, at least you'd never have to worry about defending Denmark, again. They want out of NATO (and the EU) and the end of the Cold War hasn't changed that they still see the US as the evil imperialist empire.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Dankula Weighs in on Being Convicted for His Dog’s Politics
As I said, those entirely within the protection of the walls around the burg, can be inclined to frivolous hippie communery, but they never actually try to knock a brick out of the wall, all talk, no action.BjornP wrote:Well, if everyone voted for the Unity List here, at least you'd never have to worry about defending Denmark, again. They want out of NATO (and the EU) and the end of the Cold War hasn't changed that they still see the US as the evil imperialist empire.
Upon bricks actually being kicked? Quite sure the Anglo-American nuclear deterrent would depose the Danish government forthwith and install a client regime, so fast it would be over before you even realized it was happening.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Dankula Weighs in on Being Convicted for His Dog’s Politics
Bottom line, "freedumb!" is not a mandate for the Anglo-American nuclear deterrent to make themselves into chumps, if you bit the hand that protects your little bourgeois navel gazing hippie commune, you'd have to be brought to heel, not the yardarm necessarily, but you'd get the message as to who was actually in charge of the North Atlantic security zone and who was not acceptable as an executive therein.
And that's not even realpoltik, entirely idealistic, the Anglo-American nuclear deterrent is not cynical in its defense against the scourge of Bolshevism, again it's all consistent with Westphalia, Westminster, and the Declaration of Independence too.
You are at liberty to overthrow liberty itself? Nowhere is that actually written.
Buncha lefty wefty seed eating sandal wearing asshippies thinking that they are at liberty to opt out of the Anglo-American liberal order within the contiguous borders of? Patently delusional.
You can move to Cuba anytime, there's the door, but no, you don't get to take any part of the Baltic Approaches with you, get real.
And that's not even realpoltik, entirely idealistic, the Anglo-American nuclear deterrent is not cynical in its defense against the scourge of Bolshevism, again it's all consistent with Westphalia, Westminster, and the Declaration of Independence too.
You are at liberty to overthrow liberty itself? Nowhere is that actually written.
Buncha lefty wefty seed eating sandal wearing asshippies thinking that they are at liberty to opt out of the Anglo-American liberal order within the contiguous borders of? Patently delusional.
You can move to Cuba anytime, there's the door, but no, you don't get to take any part of the Baltic Approaches with you, get real.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Dankula Weighs in on Being Convicted for His Dog’s Politics
If I've translated your florid prose correctly, I suspect I agree we'd get Quislinged by "you" in a heartbeat... if *cough* "you" did that. Good thing "you" aren't doing that, then. And somehow countries living outside NATO, get to live in frivolous hippie communes, too. And we started building our current hippie commune back in the 1920's. Funny how that goes...Smitty-48 wrote:As I said, those entirely within the protection of the walls around the burg, can be inclined to frivolous hippie communery, but they never actually try to knock a brick out of the wall, all talk, no action.BjornP wrote:Well, if everyone voted for the Unity List here, at least you'd never have to worry about defending Denmark, again. They want out of NATO (and the EU) and the end of the Cold War hasn't changed that they still see the US as the evil imperialist empire.
Upon bricks actually being kicked? Quite sure the Anglo-American nuclear deterrent would depose the Danish government forthwith and install a client regime, so fast it would be over before you even realized it was happening.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Dankula Weighs in on Being Convicted for His Dog’s Politics
Smitty-48 wrote:Case in point; what violence did Ethel Rosenberg ever commit? Answer; none.
Technically, she didn't even commit treason, she simply hung out at the meetings and then refused to name names after.
Resolution? The yardarm; ZAP!
Did the republic fall as a result? Nope, sun came up the next day, business as usual.
Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Dankula Weighs in on Being Convicted for His Dog’s Politics
You'd be the Quislings with all your bullshitsteryrical "America is an evil empire" blah-blah-blah, we'd simply be preventing the maritime strategic choke point of the NATO Baltic Approaches from falling into the wrong hands, and the EU would side with us, you'd have nobody in your corner if you tried to go Bolshie on us, you'd be the pariah, we'd be the ones coming to the rescue of Brussels, as per usual.BjornP wrote:If I've translated your florid prose correctly, I suspect I agree we'd get Quislinged by "you" in a heartbeat... if *cough* "you" did that. Good thing "you" aren't doing that, then. And somehow countries living outside NATO, get to live in frivolous hippie communes, too. And we started building our current hippie commune back in the 1920's. Funny how that goes...Smitty-48 wrote:As I said, those entirely within the protection of the walls around the burg, can be inclined to frivolous hippie communery, but they never actually try to knock a brick out of the wall, all talk, no action.BjornP wrote:Well, if everyone voted for the Unity List here, at least you'd never have to worry about defending Denmark, again. They want out of NATO (and the EU) and the end of the Cold War hasn't changed that they still see the US as the evil imperialist empire.
Upon bricks actually being kicked? Quite sure the Anglo-American nuclear deterrent would depose the Danish government forthwith and install a client regime, so fast it would be over before you even realized it was happening.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Dankula Weighs in on Being Convicted for His Dog’s Politics
That's not what a Quisling is. What you're proposing, a foreign puppet, that's a Quisling. And the maritime chokepoint would only fall into the wrong hands if this hyper-hypothetical Unity List-Denmark allowed Russia or China the right to build bases on some Danish island somewhere.Smitty-48 wrote:You'd be the Quislings with all you "America is an evil empire" blah-blah-blah, we'd simply be preventing the maritime strategic choke point of the NATO Baltic Approaches from falling into the wrong hands, and the EU would side with us, you'd have nobody in your corner if you tried to go Bolshie on us.BjornP wrote:If I've translated your florid prose correctly, I suspect I agree we'd get Quislinged by "you" in a heartbeat... if *cough* "you" did that. Good thing "you" aren't doing that, then. And somehow countries living outside NATO, get to live in frivolous hippie communes, too. And we started building our current hippie commune back in the 1920's. Funny how that goes...Smitty-48 wrote:
As I said, those entirely within the protection of the walls around the burg, can be inclined to frivolous hippie communery, but they never actually try to knock a brick out of the wall, all talk, no action.
Upon bricks actually being kicked? Quite sure the Anglo-American nuclear deterrent would depose the Danish government forthwith and install a client regime, so fast it would be over before you even realized it was happening.
The idea of NATO attacking a former member for leaving the alliance, even Denmark with its strategic position... Yeah, no, doesn't sound politically likely, and you'll need more than just your usual florid prose to sell it.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.