Real Rules?
-
- Posts: 28317
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Real Rules?
I voted no.
Marty can handle himself, if he couldn't, he wouldn't be a self made millionaire and Polymath, to suggest Marty needs special rules diminishes the man.
While I get as annoyed as anyone when people shit on threads to shit on threads, I'm not for banning it through force, at least without warning and hell that would just create another mess. Plus, I really kind of like the Free Speech, Free Fire Zone.
Banning Cussing, What the Fuck, are we Quakers ?
No, a mutual agreement of guidelines between peers is the only way to up the grace of the site.
Folks we are strong group, even before the move to MHF. I'm guessing not a lot of online groups would mutually agree to vacate a site for a 90 days to give younger posters time to grow into the site. We did that at DCF, this is a small issue for us that we can settle without me having check a sticky and consult my legal counsel before I post.
Marty can handle himself, if he couldn't, he wouldn't be a self made millionaire and Polymath, to suggest Marty needs special rules diminishes the man.
While I get as annoyed as anyone when people shit on threads to shit on threads, I'm not for banning it through force, at least without warning and hell that would just create another mess. Plus, I really kind of like the Free Speech, Free Fire Zone.
Banning Cussing, What the Fuck, are we Quakers ?
No, a mutual agreement of guidelines between peers is the only way to up the grace of the site.
Folks we are strong group, even before the move to MHF. I'm guessing not a lot of online groups would mutually agree to vacate a site for a 90 days to give younger posters time to grow into the site. We did that at DCF, this is a small issue for us that we can settle without me having check a sticky and consult my legal counsel before I post.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Real Rules?
Like I'm not in it for the lulz, as usual GCF is way off.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Smitty's just in it for the lulz. capps is tilting at endless windmills for nothing.Nukedog wrote:Let's get some fact checkers in here
Clubby called out Monte, a personal friend of mine, for being a kiddy fycker after I made some edgy edits to Monte's post on the old forum to fuck with him for shits and giggles. Clubby ran with the meme because he has very little spatial intelligence regarding humor for over two years. Monte got pissed. Kath edited a post that may or may not have been extremely suggestive concerning fucking under age boys. Canadians get upset because a jew was molested and rally for war. So basically this is the gist of your general sperg fests? "Don't mess with Canadians or we will shit up your posts"
You're not a serious nation.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Real Rules?
You are in the wrong thread in the wrong forum, dude. That, or come down from the mushroom trip before posting. Not a mention of posting foul language.C-Mag wrote:
Banning Cussing, What the Fuck, are we Quakers ?
Banning GRAPHIC details of raping children is NOT cool and will continue to be modded out. Deal with it, or plea to Martin to get me fired. Fuck you all for wanting this shit to stand.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 25293
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Real Rules?
Yyyyyyyeah. A sane person would stop telling a 'joke' when it became clear that he was pissing off the entire board.StCapps wrote:Like I'm not in it for the lulz, as usual GCF is way off.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Smitty's just in it for the lulz. capps is tilting at endless windmills for nothing.Nukedog wrote:Let's get some fact checkers in here
Clubby called out Monte, a personal friend of mine, for being a kiddy fycker after I made some edgy edits to Monte's post on the old forum to fuck with him for shits and giggles. Clubby ran with the meme because he has very little spatial intelligence regarding humor for over two years. Monte got pissed. Kath edited a post that may or may not have been extremely suggestive concerning fucking under age boys. Canadians get upset because a jew was molested and rally for war. So basically this is the gist of your general sperg fests? "Don't mess with Canadians or we will shit up your posts"
You're not a serious nation.
Nice try.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Real Rules?
Translation: No pedophile jokes that Kath finds to be in bad taste, or she'll front like it's kiddie porn.Kath wrote:You are in the wrong thread in the wrong forum, dude. That, or come down from the mushroom trip before posting. Not a mention of posting foul language.C-Mag wrote:
Banning Cussing, What the Fuck, are we Quakers ?
Banning GRAPHIC details of raping children is NOT cool and will continue to be modded out. Deal with it, or plea to Martin to get me fired. Fuck you all for wanting this shit to stand.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Real Rules?
Fuck your feelz, I'm not in for the popularity, lulz are more important, and fucking with Kath for being a terrible moderator, that's good fun.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Yyyyyyyeah. A sane person would stop telling a 'joke' when it became clear that he was pissing off the entire board.StCapps wrote:Like I'm not in it for the lulz, as usual GCF is way off.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Smitty's just in it for the lulz. capps is tilting at endless windmills for nothing.
Nice try.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 25293
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Real Rules?
Ok, fella. You're a real funny guy.StCapps wrote:Fuck your feelz, I'm not in for the popularity, lulz are more important, and fucking with Kath for being a terrible moderator, that's good fun.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Yyyyyyyeah. A sane person would stop telling a 'joke' when it became clear that he was pissing off the entire board.StCapps wrote:Like I'm not in it for the lulz, as usual GCF is way off.
Nice try.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Real Rules?
All the cool second graders agree!StCapps wrote:and fucking with Kath for being a terrible moderator, that's good fun.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Real Rules?
Get better at your job and it won't be as fun, you make it way too easy, especially when you refuse to admit any fault in your moderation, and in this war you started. You brought this on yourself, enjoy.Kath wrote:All the cool second graders agree!StCapps wrote:and fucking with Kath for being a terrible moderator, that's good fun.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 28317
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Real Rules?
Your response does not even begin to capture the spirit of post. Bottom line is we can do this without authorizing a future Stazi force that curbs Free Speech. I'm willing to put up with the shit posting and bad manners to keep Free Speech.Kath wrote:You are in the wrong thread in the wrong forum, dude. That, or come down from the mushroom trip before posting. Not a mention of posting foul language.C-Mag wrote:
Banning Cussing, What the Fuck, are we Quakers ?
Banning GRAPHIC details of raping children is NOT cool and will continue to be modded out. Deal with it, or plea to Martin to get me fired. Fuck you all for wanting this shit to stand.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience