Real Rules?

Do you support any of the below rules for decorum on the forum?

Do not shit on Martin and do not shit in his threads.
7
21%
The owner of a thread gets to decide when the off-topic detour becomes disruptive/spam
6
18%
No hardcore porn, including descriptive text
8
24%
None of the above
12
36%
 
Total votes: 33

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28317
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Real Rules?

Post by C-Mag » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:06 pm

I voted no.

Marty can handle himself, if he couldn't, he wouldn't be a self made millionaire and Polymath, to suggest Marty needs special rules diminishes the man.

While I get as annoyed as anyone when people shit on threads to shit on threads, I'm not for banning it through force, at least without warning and hell that would just create another mess. Plus, I really kind of like the Free Speech, Free Fire Zone.

Banning Cussing, What the Fuck, are we Quakers ?



No, a mutual agreement of guidelines between peers is the only way to up the grace of the site.

Folks we are strong group, even before the move to MHF. I'm guessing not a lot of online groups would mutually agree to vacate a site for a 90 days to give younger posters time to grow into the site. We did that at DCF, this is a small issue for us that we can settle without me having check a sticky and consult my legal counsel before I post.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:14 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Nukedog wrote:Let's get some fact checkers in here

Clubby called out Monte, a personal friend of mine, for being a kiddy fycker after I made some edgy edits to Monte's post on the old forum to fuck with him for shits and giggles. Clubby ran with the meme because he has very little spatial intelligence regarding humor for over two years. Monte got pissed. Kath edited a post that may or may not have been extremely suggestive concerning fucking under age boys. Canadians get upset because a jew was molested and rally for war. So basically this is the gist of your general sperg fests? "Don't mess with Canadians or we will shit up your posts"

You're not a serious nation.
Smitty's just in it for the lulz. capps is tilting at endless windmills for nothing.
Like I'm not in it for the lulz, as usual GCF is way off.
*yip*

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:16 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Banning Cussing, What the Fuck, are we Quakers ?
You are in the wrong thread in the wrong forum, dude. That, or come down from the mushroom trip before posting. Not a mention of posting foul language.

Banning GRAPHIC details of raping children is NOT cool and will continue to be modded out. Deal with it, or plea to Martin to get me fired. Fuck you all for wanting this shit to stand.
Account abandoned.

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25293
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Real Rules?

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:19 pm

StCapps wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Nukedog wrote:Let's get some fact checkers in here

Clubby called out Monte, a personal friend of mine, for being a kiddy fycker after I made some edgy edits to Monte's post on the old forum to fuck with him for shits and giggles. Clubby ran with the meme because he has very little spatial intelligence regarding humor for over two years. Monte got pissed. Kath edited a post that may or may not have been extremely suggestive concerning fucking under age boys. Canadians get upset because a jew was molested and rally for war. So basically this is the gist of your general sperg fests? "Don't mess with Canadians or we will shit up your posts"

You're not a serious nation.
Smitty's just in it for the lulz. capps is tilting at endless windmills for nothing.
Like I'm not in it for the lulz, as usual GCF is way off.
Yyyyyyyeah. A sane person would stop telling a 'joke' when it became clear that he was pissing off the entire board.

Nice try.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:19 pm

Kath wrote:
C-Mag wrote:
Banning Cussing, What the Fuck, are we Quakers ?
You are in the wrong thread in the wrong forum, dude. That, or come down from the mushroom trip before posting. Not a mention of posting foul language.

Banning GRAPHIC details of raping children is NOT cool and will continue to be modded out. Deal with it, or plea to Martin to get me fired. Fuck you all for wanting this shit to stand.
Translation: No pedophile jokes that Kath finds to be in bad taste, or she'll front like it's kiddie porn.
*yip*

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:20 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
StCapps wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Smitty's just in it for the lulz. capps is tilting at endless windmills for nothing.
Like I'm not in it for the lulz, as usual GCF is way off.
Yyyyyyyeah. A sane person would stop telling a 'joke' when it became clear that he was pissing off the entire board.

Nice try.
Fuck your feelz, I'm not in for the popularity, lulz are more important, and fucking with Kath for being a terrible moderator, that's good fun.
*yip*

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25293
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Real Rules?

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:21 pm

StCapps wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
StCapps wrote:Like I'm not in it for the lulz, as usual GCF is way off.
Yyyyyyyeah. A sane person would stop telling a 'joke' when it became clear that he was pissing off the entire board.

Nice try.
Fuck your feelz, I'm not in for the popularity, lulz are more important, and fucking with Kath for being a terrible moderator, that's good fun.
Ok, fella. You're a real funny guy.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:23 pm

StCapps wrote:and fucking with Kath for being a terrible moderator, that's good fun.
All the cool second graders agree!
Account abandoned.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:27 pm

Kath wrote:
StCapps wrote:and fucking with Kath for being a terrible moderator, that's good fun.
All the cool second graders agree!
Get better at your job and it won't be as fun, you make it way too easy, especially when you refuse to admit any fault in your moderation, and in this war you started. You brought this on yourself, enjoy.
*yip*

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28317
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Real Rules?

Post by C-Mag » Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:06 pm

Kath wrote:
C-Mag wrote:
Banning Cussing, What the Fuck, are we Quakers ?
You are in the wrong thread in the wrong forum, dude. That, or come down from the mushroom trip before posting. Not a mention of posting foul language.

Banning GRAPHIC details of raping children is NOT cool and will continue to be modded out. Deal with it, or plea to Martin to get me fired. Fuck you all for wanting this shit to stand.
Your response does not even begin to capture the spirit of post. Bottom line is we can do this without authorizing a future Stazi force that curbs Free Speech. I'm willing to put up with the shit posting and bad manners to keep Free Speech.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience