Sun Edison - Solar Energy is too expensive?

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14807
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Sun Edison - Solar Energy is too expensive?

Post by The Conservative »

TheReal_ND wrote:That is cool. There's got to be a biochemical way to harness sun light as well.
Yeah, just google videos about birds chasing bugs into those things.

They may help us, but they destroy ecosystems.
#NotOneRedCent
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Sun Edison - Solar Energy is too expensive?

Post by Speaker to Animals »

Solar has limited uses, but the dog and pony show you are sold by the environmentalists is a fucking joke.

Nuclear power is the only viable direction we have right now.

If we can get into space, sure, solar will be king there.
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Sun Edison - Solar Energy is too expensive?

Post by Montegriffo »

The Conservative wrote:
TheReal_ND wrote:That is cool. There's got to be a biochemical way to harness sun light as well.
Yeah, just google videos about birds chasing bugs into those things.

They may help us, but they destroy ecosystems.
That's why you build them in places like Morocco, there is very little wildlife in the Sahara desert and you are not using valuable farmland. There are many such areas around the globe where the land has no other use and can be used for solar energy. If you really care about wildlife then the faster we can move away from fossil fuels the better. Changing the climate will damage the environment far more than solar energy.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25410
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Sun Edison - Solar Energy is too expensive?

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Montegriffo wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
TheReal_ND wrote:That is cool. There's got to be a biochemical way to harness sun light as well.
Yeah, just google videos about birds chasing bugs into those things.

They may help us, but they destroy ecosystems.
That's why you build them in places like Morocco, there is very little wildlife in the Sahara desert and you are not using valuable farmland. There are many such areas around the globe where the land has no other use and can be used for solar energy. If you really care about wildlife then the faster we can move away from fossil fuels the better. Changing the climate will damage the environment far more than solar energy.
This. We have no shortage of deserts around for this. Just have to pay some poor bastard to clean off the panels every day.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Sun Edison - Solar Energy is too expensive?

Post by Montegriffo »

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
Yeah, just google videos about birds chasing bugs into those things.

They may help us, but they destroy ecosystems.
That's why you build them in places like Morocco, there is very little wildlife in the Sahara desert and you are not using valuable farmland. There are many such areas around the globe where the land has no other use and can be used for solar energy. If you really care about wildlife then the faster we can move away from fossil fuels the better. Changing the climate will damage the environment far more than solar energy.
This. We have no shortage of deserts around for this. Just have to pay some poor bastard to clean off the panels every day.
You could pay someone or you could just automate it. Something like a windscreen wiper.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: Sun Edison - Solar Energy is too expensive?

Post by Ex-California »

Montegriffo wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
That's why you build them in places like Morocco, there is very little wildlife in the Sahara desert and you are not using valuable farmland. There are many such areas around the globe where the land has no other use and can be used for solar energy. If you really care about wildlife then the faster we can move away from fossil fuels the better. Changing the climate will damage the environment far more than solar energy.
This. We have no shortage of deserts around for this. Just have to pay some poor bastard to clean off the panels every day.
You could pay someone or you could just automate it. Something like a windscreen wiper.
Have you seen how large these things are?

Also, deserts are windy, that's why the one on the way to Vegas is fucked up
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14807
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Sun Edison - Solar Energy is too expensive?

Post by The Conservative »

Montegriffo wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
TheReal_ND wrote:That is cool. There's got to be a biochemical way to harness sun light as well.
Yeah, just google videos about birds chasing bugs into those things.

They may help us, but they destroy ecosystems.
That's why you build them in places like Morocco, there is very little wildlife in the Sahara desert and you are not using valuable farmland. There are many such areas around the globe where the land has no other use and can be used for solar energy. If you really care about wildlife then the faster we can move away from fossil fuels the better. Changing the climate will damage the environment far more than solar energy.
http://www.latimes.com/local/california ... story.html

Not...
#NotOneRedCent
User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: Sun Edison - Solar Energy is too expensive?

Post by Ex-California »

The Conservative wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
Yeah, just google videos about birds chasing bugs into those things.

They may help us, but they destroy ecosystems.
That's why you build them in places like Morocco, there is very little wildlife in the Sahara desert and you are not using valuable farmland. There are many such areas around the globe where the land has no other use and can be used for solar energy. If you really care about wildlife then the faster we can move away from fossil fuels the better. Changing the climate will damage the environment far more than solar energy.
http://www.latimes.com/local/california ... story.html

Not...
6000 annually? I'm sure 6000 birds are killed daily by big rigs
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14807
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Sun Edison - Solar Energy is too expensive?

Post by The Conservative »

California wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
That's why you build them in places like Morocco, there is very little wildlife in the Sahara desert and you are not using valuable farmland. There are many such areas around the globe where the land has no other use and can be used for solar energy. If you really care about wildlife then the faster we can move away from fossil fuels the better. Changing the climate will damage the environment far more than solar energy.
http://www.latimes.com/local/california ... story.html

Not...
6000 annually? I'm sure 6000 birds are killed daily by big rigs
Lets take this into consideration, rigs have been around for how many decades?

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 0/abstract

Lets also look at this abstract:

Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California: 888,000 bat and 573,000 bird fatalities/year (including 83,000 raptor fatalities)/year in 2012...

You do the math...
#NotOneRedCent
User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: Sun Edison - Solar Energy is too expensive?

Post by Ex-California »

The Conservative wrote:
California wrote:
6000 annually? I'm sure 6000 birds are killed daily by big rigs
Lets take this into consideration, rigs have been around for how many decades?

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 0/abstract

Lets also look at this abstract:

Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California: 888,000 bat and 573,000 bird fatalities/year (including 83,000 raptor fatalities)/year in 2012...

You do the math...
What's your point? That orders of magnitude are killed more by wind than solar?
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session