Civil War Doomsday Clock

[kybkh]

Pretty sure he was one of them. Not that it matters.

You need to stop reading Ron’s newsletters. The Chinese food coupons aren’t even to places that serve fried cashew chicken in brown sauce.

[StCapps]

If that's all nick moore has, how he thinks that is conclusive video evidence is beyond me. He must have been reffing Avs-Sharks Game 7 and thinks there is evidence to overturn the call when he's got jack shit.

So now the forensics are part of your conspiracy ?

The forensics don't say what you think they do. Your interpretation is faulty, you jump to conclusions that make no sense.

[C-Mag]

1970 Plymouth Road Runner
426 Hemi

[nmoore63]

If that's all nick moore has, how he thinks that is conclusive video evidence is beyond me. He must have been reffing Avs-Sharks Game 7 and thinks there is evidence to overturn the call when he's got jack shit.

So now the forensics are part of your conspiracy ?

The forensics don't say what you think they do. Your interpretation is faulty, you jump to conclusions that make no sense.

evidence?

[StCapps]

So now the forensics are part of your conspiracy ?

The forensics don't say what you think they do. Your interpretation is faulty, you jump to conclusions that make no sense.

evidence?

Your forensics say that blunt force trauma to the chest caused the heart attack, prove it was the car that caused that blunt force trauma, or you got jack shit. Blood on windshield is not proof, there are ways her blood could get there without being hit by the car, you just assume that is how it got there. You are speculating and jumping to conclusions, without the actual forensic proof to back up the case you are making, step your game up.

[Speaker to Animals]

CPR is literally blunt force trauma.

[Speaker to Animals]

Somebody needs to take that hilarious photoshop image he posted and put Elmo's face on it instead.

[nmoore63]

The forensics don't say what you think they do. Your interpretation is faulty, you jump to conclusions that make no sense.

evidence?

Your forensics say that blunt force trauma to the chest caused the heart attack, prove it was the car that caused that blunt force trauma, or you got jack shit. Blood on windshield is not proof, there are ways her blood could get there without being hit by the car, you just assume that is how it got there. You are speculating and jumping to conclusions, without the actual forensic proof to back up the case you are making, step your game up.

Blood on the window doesn’t count?

You are a moron

[StCapps]

evidence?

Your forensics say that blunt force trauma to the chest caused the heart attack, prove it was the car that caused that blunt force trauma, or you got jack shit. Blood on windshield is not proof, there are ways her blood could get there without being hit by the car, you just assume that is how it got there. You are speculating and jumping to conclusions, without the actual forensic proof to back up the case you are making, step your game up.

Blood on the window doesn’t count?

You are a moron

Blood on the window counts. If there is other evidence to back up the conclusion that the car hit her, you are quite low on that other evidence. It in and of itself is not proof that the conclusion you reached is the correct one.

[nmoore63]

You folks are not serious people.

Good bye.