nmoore wants to avail to argument ad populum instead of actually proving his case, so at this point, I'm giving the victory to StA for actually engaging in good faith. nmoore wants to feign like he's above the argument but is so sure he's right, yet cannot show any photo or video evidence of her being struck by the car.
If you want to win this one Nick, you got to step your game up, and stop playing silly games, your current argument is not persuasive.
I missed this.
You want me to relink the data in the article that makes the case?
I already provided the link.
How about you provide the evidence yourself and make your own case, and stop hiding behind blog posts that are nowhere near as persuasive as you think they are?
You are supposed to show the evidence, not say the evidence is in the link, go read it, and then when people come to a different conclusion than you about your link, duck all further argument.
You can go ahead and do that anyway, but that isn't arguing in good faith, and you are making a fool out of yourself getting clowned on by StA of all people, so I would advise that you step your game up.
Last edited by StCapps on Wed May 22, 2019 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
nmoore wants to avail to argument ad populum instead of actually proving his case, so at this point, I'm giving the victory to StA for actually engaging in good faith. nmoore wants to feign like he's above the argument but is so sure he's right, yet cannot show any photo or video evidence of her being struck by the car.
If you want to win this one Nick, you got to step your game up, and stop playing silly games, your current argument is not persuasive.
I missed this.
You want me to relink the data in the article that makes the case?
I already provided the link.
How about you provide the evidence yourself and make your own case, and stop hiding behind blog posts that are nowhere near as persuasive as you think they are?
I linked to forensics that said "yep hit by a car"
I linked to forensics that said "blood on the car"
The stupid lying from StA concerning why they were doing CPR... is not even worth responding to.
The stupid lying from StA concerning the Teal woman that is not the lady... NOR EVER CLAIMED TO BE THE LADY... is pathetic strawman.
Post the forensics in this thread, don't just link to a blog post that doesn't say what you think it does. You posted evidence that she was hit by something, and that her blood was on the car, now post the evidence that she was actually hit by the car and they caused that to happen, because I never saw it, but I do see you jumping to conclusions based on what little evidence you have presented.
Still waiting on evidence that she was hit by the car, seeing a lot of assumptions, and not a lot of evidence to back up those assumptions. Comparing this situation to the OJ trial is ridiculous, they had evidence against OJ, and damning evidence.
Where's the damning evidence at? Y'all keeping it to yourselves?
Lady not in black and white:
Lady underneath the tattooed back dude, getting rocked a block.
Same lady getting blown to fuck
lady2.png
Watch the video, put it in super slow mo, and watch second 2 to second 3 one frame at a time.
Those 30 people included Heather Heyer, the woman who died after this incident.
The captain described her injuries in court, saying she had a large bruise across her chest, which indicated something large had hit her.
Immediate bruising of a person means it is a serious injury.
According to court testimony, first responders were doing CPR on Heyer, but she wasn't breathing on her own and did not have a pulse.
On Monday afternoon, officials from the medical examiner's office also testified.
They confirmed Heyer's cause of death, which was blunt force injury to the torso.
A forensic expert explained they completed multiple tests and found Heyer's blood on the car windshield and mirror and on the ground in the area of where the incident happened.
Eat shit Capps
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Post the forensics in this thread, don't just link to a blog post that doesn't say what you think it does. You posted evidence that she was hit by something, and that her blood was on the car, now post the evidence that she was actually hit by the car and they caused that to happen, because I never saw it, but I do see you jumping to conclusions based on what little evidence you have presented.
I did already. Posted above... again... for the slower folks.
Postby Speaker to Animals » Wed May 22, 2019 2:50 pm
Dude. Come on. The first one is obviously photoshopped nonsense.
You cannot see her in the second one.
Your video is looking the other way from where she was standing. There is the giant ass of a fat black woman in there you might be confusing. But that fat black woman wasn't hit either.
If you watch the full footage, you will see Heather on the sidewalk getting CPR (she had a heart attack). I have posted this multiple times.
I missed this.
You want me to relink the data in the article that makes the case?
I already provided the link.
How about you provide the evidence yourself and make your own case, and stop hiding behind blog posts that are nowhere near as persuasive as you think they are?
I linked to forensics that said "yep hit by a car"
I linked to forensics that said "blood on the car"
The stupid lying from StA concerning why they were doing CPR... is not even worth responding to.
The stupid lying from StA concerning the Teal woman that is not the lady... NOR EVER CLAIMED TO BE THE LADY... is pathetic strawman.
If you perform chest compressions on somebody, you will break their ribs. There will be a lot of damage to their chest. Which is why you practice on a dummy.. derp
Am I the only person here who took CPR classes?? Really?
Just screaming LIAR at me doesn't somehow win this argument, Nick. Of course she had chest damages. She had a heart attack and they performed CPR on her! Most people who had heart attacks and were resuscitated have serious chest injuries, dude. LOL
If that's all nick moore has, how he thinks that is conclusive video evidence is beyond me. He must have been reffing Avs-Sharks Game 7 and thinks there is evidence to overturn the call when he's got jack shit.
If that's all nick moore has, how he thinks that is conclusive video evidence is beyond me. He must have been reffing Avs-Sharks Game 7 and thinks there is evidence to overturn the call when he's got jack shit.
So now the forensics are part of your conspiracy ?
The one thing I say in defense of the driver, is if he was in that situation on an interstate or outerloop like we say in Arizona and he came under attack as he was driving, him flooring it would seem less premeditated. I mean, I have drove up on a parade before and I didn't blow through the drum corp because the trombone section came by and started sliding their damn horns in to my car.
“I've got a phone that allows me to convene Americans from every walk of life, nonprofits, businesses, the private sector, universities to try to bring more and more Americans together around what I think is a unifying theme..." - Obama
