Re: 2020 election
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:51 pm
Elizabeth Warren?C-Mag wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:21 pm What's that mean for Bernie, well, he needs a woman of color as a running mate. Who's that point to ?
Page 30 of 240
Re: 2020 election
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:53 pm
I still can't believe they are not boosting Tulsi.
Re: 2020 election
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:57 pm
Why not Michelle Obama? Hell, the left would orgasm if she put her hat into the ring.Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:53 pm I still can't believe they are not boosting Tulsi.
Re: 2020 election
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:59 pm
Because Tulsi Gabbard would wipe out Trump's advantage in the middle, she would easily take a lot of Trump's base to boot, and there's really nothing he can do or say to denigrate her like he can for every other democratic candidate.The Conservative wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:57 pmWhy not Michelle Obama? Hell, the left would orgasm if she put her hat into the ring.Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:53 pm I still can't believe they are not boosting Tulsi.
Re: 2020 election
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:00 pm
Michael's business interests are best kept on the DL.The Conservative wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:57 pmWhy not Michelle Obama? Hell, the left would orgasm if she put her hat into the ring.Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:53 pm I still can't believe they are not boosting Tulsi.
Re: 2020 election
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:02 pm
Re: 2020 election
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:04 pm
Tulsi would be his best choice. It would be a real stabilizing influence, she has the right equipment between her legs, she's an actual native American, military experience, a moderate to the Socialist.Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:59 pmBecause Tulsi Gabbard would wipe out Trump's advantage in the middle, she would easily take a lot of Trump's base to boot, and there's really nothing he can do or say to denigrate her like he can for every other democratic candidate.The Conservative wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:57 pmWhy not Michelle Obama? Hell, the left would orgasm if she put her hat into the ring.Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:53 pm I still can't believe they are not boosting Tulsi.
I don't think Tulsi would do it.
What about AOC ?
Re: 2020 election
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:05 pm
AOC isn't 35.C-Mag wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:04 pmTulsi would be his best choice. It would be a real stabilizing influence, she has the right equipment between her legs, she's an actual native American, military experience, a moderate to the Socialist.Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:59 pmBecause Tulsi Gabbard would wipe out Trump's advantage in the middle, she would easily take a lot of Trump's base to boot, and there's really nothing he can do or say to denigrate her like he can for every other democratic candidate.The Conservative wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:57 pm
Why not Michelle Obama? Hell, the left would orgasm if she put her hat into the ring.
I don't think Tulsi would do it.
What about AOC ?
Re: 2020 election
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:07 pm
Have you checked her long form birth certificate ?nmoore63 wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:05 pmAOC isn't 35.C-Mag wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:04 pmTulsi would be his best choice. It would be a real stabilizing influence, she has the right equipment between her legs, she's an actual native American, military experience, a moderate to the Socialist.Speaker to Animals wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:59 pm
Because Tulsi Gabbard would wipe out Trump's advantage in the middle, she would easily take a lot of Trump's base to boot, and there's really nothing he can do or say to denigrate her like he can for every other democratic candidate.
I don't think Tulsi would do it.
What about AOC ?
Re: 2020 election
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:22 pm
Just the tab she left at the last job she had...C-Mag wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:07 pmHave you checked her long form birth certificate ?nmoore63 wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:05 pmAOC isn't 35.C-Mag wrote: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:04 pm
Tulsi would be his best choice. It would be a real stabilizing influence, she has the right equipment between her legs, she's an actual native American, military experience, a moderate to the Socialist.
I don't think Tulsi would do it.
What about AOC ?