Looks like you all are going to jail, mind felons.
Wow that is incoherent.
That is not incoherent. Stupid yes. But certainly not incoherent. Everybody understands it perfectly well. This is the modern left, this what you shill for, deal with it.
She argues to ban porn. Then argues that without it, men would “mind rape” women that they’ve seen irl, and that’s worse.
It’s logically inconsistent. Everybody can see it perfectly well. This is the modern right. This is what you shill for. Mindless feelz and blather.
That is not incoherent. Stupid yes. But certainly not incoherent. Everybody understands it perfectly well. This is the modern left, this what you shill for, deal with it.
She argues to ban porn. Then argues that without it, men would “mind rape” women that they’ve seen irl, and that’s worse.
It’s logically inconsistent. Everybody can see it perfectly well. This is the modern right. This is what you shill for. Mindless feelz and blather.
No "she" doesn't. We don't know who posted this garbage as it is unattributed it also was a simple copy paste job in twitter so that could very well be two different comments from two different authors or the first statement is taken out of context. You are to only focus on the highlighted portion. GCF thinks an incomplete snippet from an article is incoherent, well fucking duh, dumbass. This is the modern left. This is what you shill for. Take one little remark in or out of context and try to stretch to something out to some other conclusion with no research or followup.
I am glad you see this sort of argumentation as incoherent because it is your argument on guns.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Independent thought be hard, just go with the groupthink.
clubgop wrote:
That is not incoherent. Stupid yes. But certainly not incoherent. Everybody understands it perfectly well. This is the modern left, this what you shill for, deal with it.
She argues to ban porn. Then argues that without it, men would “mind rape” women that they’ve seen irl, and that’s worse.
It’s logically inconsistent. Everybody can see it perfectly well. This is the modern right. This is what you shill for. Mindless feelz and blather.
No "she" doesn't. We don't know who posted this garbage as it is unattributed it also was a simple copy paste job in twitter so that could very well be two different comments from two different authors or the first statement is taken out of context. You are to only focus on the highlighted portion. GCF thinks an incomplete snippet from an article is incoherent, well fucking duh, dumbass. This is the modern left. This is what you shill for. Take one little remark in or out of context and try to stretch to something out to some other conclusion with no research or followup.
I am glad you see this sort of argumentation as incoherent because it is your argument on guns.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Independent thought be hard, just go with the groupthink.
And here comes Clubby to remind us to only think and consider “the highlighted portion”, lest we get confused in our virtue signaling.
Then proceeds to claim that it’s not enough information to understand the argument.
Feelz intact, virtue signaled, and logic abandoned. This is the modern right.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
She argues to ban porn. Then argues that without it, men would “mind rape” women that they’ve seen irl, and that’s worse.
It’s logically inconsistent. Everybody can see it perfectly well. This is the modern right. This is what you shill for. Mindless feelz and blather.
No "she" doesn't. We don't know who posted this garbage as it is unattributed it also was a simple copy paste job in twitter so that could very well be two different comments from two different authors or the first statement is taken out of context. You are to only focus on the highlighted portion. GCF thinks an incomplete snippet from an article is incoherent, well fucking duh, dumbass. This is the modern left. This is what you shill for. Take one little remark in or out of context and try to stretch to something out to some other conclusion with no research or followup.
I am glad you see this sort of argumentation as incoherent because it is your argument on guns.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Independent thought be hard, just go with the groupthink.
And here comes Clubby to remind us to only think and consider “the highlighted portion”, lest we get confused in our virtue signaling.
Then proceeds to claim that it’s not enough information to understand the argument.
Feelz intact, virtue signaled, and logic abandoned. This is the modern right.
WTF are you talking about? Who is virtue signaling here? Who is preserving their feelz? Who is abanding all logic? It is you, claiming some omnipotent powers of observation not given in evidence. Taking a highlighted snippet and extrapolating that out to whatever bullshit you want to manufacture. "Like the 2nd Amendment is for the Police" argument you peddle. This is the modern left.
Mike Rowe takes an SJW head-on.
Not posting quotes, because you should read the entire thing.
Writing him in for president 2020.
No one believes you. You think your undercover hack bitch status is like a carbon credit you can make up for. Like you're some sort of Catholic trying to buy indulgences. Nope, doesn't work like that.
Mike Rowe takes an SJW head-on.
Not posting quotes, because you should read the entire thing.
Writing him in for president 2020.
No one believes you. You think your undercover hack bitch status is like a carbon credit you can make up for. Like you're some sort of Catholic trying to buy indulgences. Nope, doesn't work like that.
Mike Rowe takes an SJW head-on.
Not posting quotes, because you should read the entire thing.
Writing him in for president 2020.
No one believes you. You think your undercover hack bitch status is like a carbon credit you can make up for. Like you're some sort of Catholic trying to buy indulgences. Nope, doesn't work like that.
Oh, I forgot. I’m an SJW right?
Not 100% but then again who is 100% when signaling that virtue? A ponderer for the ages
An undercover hack bitch? Certifiably.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
