Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!

[The Conservative]

Did I seriously just hear ACO just reference the National Enquirer as a legitimate news source while asking Cohen a question?

How the fuck did she get that committee assignment?

At least she is somewhat pleasant to look at. When she talks she doesn't make your balls shrink up as long as you don't actually listen to what she is saying.

When she doesn’t open her mouth, and it’s proof beauty is skin deep, and with her that’s a fucking joke, cause she has a pretty fucking thin skin.

[The Conservative]

Did I seriously just hear ACO just reference the National Enquirer as a legitimate news source while asking Cohen a question?

How the fuck did she get that committee assignment?

Nancy Pelosi.

[C-Mag]

Cohen got strong armed by Mueller

“What many of you may not be aware of is the fact that I can personally confirm that the ONLY reason Michael Cohen ‘turned on’ the President of the United States is because Mueller threatened to throw his wife in jail for up to 30 years. Period.

She is the co-guarantor of a $20M personal loan that Mueller discovered Michael secured back in 2015 by falsely inflating the value of his taxi medallions – effectively making her part & parcel to the federal charge of ‘Making False Statements to a Financial Institution,’ to which Cohen ultimately pleaded guilty.”
Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2019/02/should-i-go ... zDm0q0j.99

[The Conservative]

So here is a question for you all, I have someone telling me that the National Enquire should be a document of record... because AOC used it as such. Since when did the NE become a legitimate news source?

[C-Mag]

BRUTAL

[C-Mag]

Don Surber, another great commentary
Democrat complains it is hard to convict Trump without a crime
https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2019/03/ ... l?spref=tw

[Fife]

Don Surber, another great commentary
Democrat complains it is hard to convict Trump without a crime
https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2019/03/ ... l?spref=tw

Mariotti is the shape of things to come.

The spinnin's gettin' ready for the Mueller report to be a dusty popcorn fart. The gymnastics to accommodate the cognitive dissonance are gonna be spectacular.

[C-Mag]

Agreed, it's going to be fun to watch.

The Swamp and Dems have multiple committees fully staffed working on putting lipstick on this pig, they have think tanks and Non-profits hired figuring researching and field polling possible narratives.

[pineapplemike]

good refresher on the 2016 origins of the word collusion

Where the Heck Did the Term 'Collusion' Come From?
https://www.lawfareblog.com/where-heck- ... usion-come

...
How did the word “collusion” get introduced into the public lexicon? And who is initially responsible for introducing it? The answer, it turns out, goes back to July of 2016 at the Democratic National Convention.

On July 22, 2016, Wikileaks released more than 19,000 emails from top members of the Democratic National Committee. Two days after the release, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager Robby Mook told CNN that, according to “experts,” Russian state actors had stolen the emails from the DNC and were releasing them through Wikileaks “for the purpose of actually helping Donald Trump.”

Mook did not use the word “collusion,” but the press, in reporting his comments, did. Within the hour, in an article timestamped at 9:55 a.m., the Washington Examiner reported that Paul Manafort and Donald Trump Jr, had responded to Mook’s allegations and “vigorously denied any kind of collusion between Trump Sr. and the Russian president.” (To be clear, Manafort denied “any ties” between Putin and the Trump campaign, and Donald Trump Jr. criticized Mook for “lie after lie.” Neither one of them mentioned “collusion.”) Ninety minutes later, at 11:27 a.m., ABC News repeated what it termed Mook’s “allegation of collusion between the campaign and Russia.” And three hours later, at approximately 12:35 p.m., Bernie Sanders’s campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, told CNN’s Jake Tapper, “If there was some kind of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence or Russian hackers, that clearly has to be dealt with.”

From there it was off to the races. Over the next two weeks, the word “collusion” was used hundreds of times by politicians like Martin O’Malley and media personalities such as Trevor Noah.
...
On Dec. 9, 2016, the Washington Post reported that the CIA had concluded that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in order to aid the Trump campaign. Although the Post did not mention the word “collusion” in its article, other media outlets such as the Economist, the Guardian, and CNN included the term when they picked up the story. After that day, the use of the word “collusion” spiked dramatically. It became the universally accepted term to describe any potential relationship between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia.

[C-Mag]

We're seeing a stampeded of news organizations trying to get out ahead of the Mueller report and reclaim some credibility. Lawfare was at the top of the list of Russia Collusion. They are on the Clinton-Obama team.