Google Memo
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Google Memo
Great analysis:
-
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Re: Google Memo
Sorry... I'm a dude. So I'm just treading water.Martin Hash wrote:Jordan Peterson needs to get some sleep. He totally should take this video down:
p.s. What was he fucking expecting?
p.p.s. The other day, Hanarchy was bad-mouthing Peterson. It got me thinking Hanarchy is female. If so, she's holding her own in this crowd.
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Google Memo
PartyOf5 wrote:Some cross-thread discussion going on about this. I'll bring my observations from the SJW thread over here.
I was on another forum and read a thread about this topic. It's amazing how different the reactions are on that forum compared to here.
Link to the other thread:
https://www.gamerswithjobs.com/node/1301231
So things got a bit heated and one of the mods stepped in to settle things down. One of the responses to the white male (I assume based on the response) was:One of those minority woman mods later made a lengthy post that included this:You have two minority women in your moderation team. You should let them moderate discussions of women's issues. You have the authority, but you lack the perspective. You are not the best person on your team to make sure these debates are inclusive and safe.I guess I'd get reported if I posted on that other forum because I read the entire manifesto and didn't find it to be a fire-able offense. I don't agree with everything in it, but I do agree with some of it. Forcing diversity by penalizing those in the majority does not get you fairness or justice, it gets you a different form of oppression and discrimination.But we'd like to ask that discussions continue to stay away from questioning whether Damore's ideas were really all that bad. If somebody starts taking that position, go ahead and throw down a report on their post.
Wtf is a "safe debate"?
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:03 am
Re: Google Memo
You don't use logic to point out their faulty assumptions.Zlaxer wrote:PartyOf5 wrote:Some cross-thread discussion going on about this. I'll bring my observations from the SJW thread over here.
I was on another forum and read a thread about this topic. It's amazing how different the reactions are on that forum compared to here.
Link to the other thread:
https://www.gamerswithjobs.com/node/1301231
So things got a bit heated and one of the mods stepped in to settle things down. One of the responses to the white male (I assume based on the response) was:One of those minority woman mods later made a lengthy post that included this:You have two minority women in your moderation team. You should let them moderate discussions of women's issues. You have the authority, but you lack the perspective. You are not the best person on your team to make sure these debates are inclusive and safe.I guess I'd get reported if I posted on that other forum because I read the entire manifesto and didn't find it to be a fire-able offense. I don't agree with everything in it, but I do agree with some of it. Forcing diversity by penalizing those in the majority does not get you fairness or justice, it gets you a different form of oppression and discrimination.But we'd like to ask that discussions continue to stay away from questioning whether Damore's ideas were really all that bad. If somebody starts taking that position, go ahead and throw down a report on their post.
Wtf is a "safe debate"?
Only Feelz allowed
NukeDog was right
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Google Memo
It's code for "you have to agree with us". As soon as you send a ripple through the water with a unique thought or opinion the debate is considered unsafe until the unique voice has been silenced. Don't you see how inclusive that is?Zlaxer wrote: Wtf is a "safe debate"?
-
- Posts: 18725
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Google Memo
Gotcha!Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:Sorry... I'm a dude. So I'm just treading water.Martin Hash wrote:p.p.s. The other day, Hanarchy was bad-mouthing Peterson. It got me thinking Hanarchy is female. If so, she's holding her own in this crowd.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Google Memo
That preview image is horrifying. Their IT guy should be wrapped in ethernet cable and tossed out a window.Speaker to Animals wrote:Great analysis:
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Google Memo
GrumpyCatFace wrote:That preview image is horrifying. Their IT guy should be wrapped in ethernet cable and tossed out a window.Speaker to Animals wrote:Great analysis:
It's pretty much par for IT guys I have ever known. Fucking animals.
-
- Posts: 14792
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Google Memo
Pfft, says the Speaker of Animals... you should know.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:That preview image is horrifying. Their IT guy should be wrapped in ethernet cable and tossed out a window.Speaker to Animals wrote:Great analysis:
It's pretty much par for IT guys I have ever known. Fucking animals.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Google Memo
I do know. Engineers have to deal with these subhumans on the daily.