THE ERA OF TRUMP

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18776
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Montegriffo »

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18776
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Montegriffo »

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18776
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Montegriffo »

SuburbanFarmer wrote: Thu Mar 27, 2025 8:12 pm
Montegriffo wrote: Thu Mar 27, 2025 6:37 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Thu Mar 27, 2025 4:05 pm

Yes it appears to be a real chat. What’s not real is that the SECDEF or NSA just accidentally brought in an asshole journalist and leaked top secret treason to him. It’s a dumb staffer who’s probably packing his bags, OR an intentional leak for some political gamesmanship.

No idea how you got to checks and balances, or a dipshit think tank piece from Heritage foundation (neocons) last year.

Or are you going back to congress declaring wars? Because we’ve all been doing the executive mass murder thing for decades now.
If the meeting took place according to the rules there would have been some sort of official minutes to go to the national archives. With this sort of group chat you can do away with that.
Bypass the checks and balances.
Like I say, it's all there in Project 25.
Yes, like routing government email to a server in your basement, and then smashing it. This is a group chat. Put your pants on.

There are no remaining checks and balances on military action. Haven’t been since the invention of the A-bomb.
''But Hillary...'' is getting a bit old now.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25393
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Montegriffo wrote: Thu Apr 03, 2025 2:35 pm
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Thu Mar 27, 2025 8:12 pm
Montegriffo wrote: Thu Mar 27, 2025 6:37 pm

If the meeting took place according to the rules there would have been some sort of official minutes to go to the national archives. With this sort of group chat you can do away with that.
Bypass the checks and balances.
Like I say, it's all there in Project 25.
Yes, like routing government email to a server in your basement, and then smashing it. This is a group chat. Put your pants on.

There are no remaining checks and balances on military action. Haven’t been since the invention of the A-bomb.
''But Hillary...'' is getting a bit old now.
Once the precedent is set and accepted, it’s pretty absurd to freak out about it later.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18776
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Montegriffo »

''Accepted''?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25393
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Montegriffo wrote: Thu Apr 03, 2025 3:52 pm ''Accepted''?
‘Lock her up’ didn’t go anywhere. Zero consequences for the elites.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18776
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Montegriffo »

Hands up who still thinks tariffs are paid by the countries you impose them on and who has worked out they are just another tax on you?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 19008
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Martin Hash »

You’re a fucking Marxist; when did you become such a conservative on taxes?

Everything that takes from someone to give to someone else is a tax. Marxism is the very definition of taxation.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18776
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Montegriffo »

Martin Hash wrote: Fri Apr 04, 2025 8:22 am You’re a fucking Marxist; when did you become such a conservative on taxes?

Everything that takes from someone to give to someone else is a tax. Marxism is the very definition of taxation.
LOL, I'm not a Marxist.

So if tariffs are taxes paid for by the consumer and Trump is going to use the income to pay for more tax cuts for the rich, have you worked out who the sucker is yet?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 19008
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP

Post by Martin Hash »

Montegriffo wrote: Fri Apr 04, 2025 8:37 am
LOL, I'm not a Marxist.
I’ve seen you walking and quacking for a decade; don’t piss down my back and tell me it’s raining.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change