Communist Revolution Has Begun

[SilverEagle]

Oh, don't be so glum. After the authoritarian, Marxist take-over is complete, and the bourgeoisie have been eliminated, the apparatus of the state will whither away and we will all be free, totally equal, and self-actualized.

Nobody alive will be around to see that. Look at Russia, the wall fell almost 30 years ago. They are still in Soviet Lite mode still.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

I have a great podcast coming up that shows the Bible, both Old & New Testaments, are the primary source of egalitarianism. Marx was a plagiarist.

The Bible is tricky, innit.

People also use Biblical authority to argue for the inviolable sovereignty of individual conscience.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Oh, don't be so glum. After the authoritarian, Marxist take-over is complete, and the bourgeoisie have been eliminated, the apparatus of the state will whither away and we will all be free, totally equal, and self-actualized.

Nobody alive will be around to see that. Look at Russia, the wall fell almost 30 years ago. They are still in Soviet Lite mode still.

The problem, obviously, is that wasn't real Communism.

[Martin Hash]

I have a great podcast coming up that shows the Bible, both Old & New Testaments, are the primary source of egalitarianism. Marx was a plagiarist.

The Bible is tricky, innit.

People also use Biblical authority to argue for the inviolable sovereignty of individual conscience.

I’ve also discussed in my podcast that egalitarians consider themselves having liberty, but they don’t include accountability in their definition.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

I have a great podcast coming up that shows the Bible, both Old & New Testaments, are the primary source of egalitarianism. Marx was a plagiarist.

The Bible is tricky, innit.

People also use Biblical authority to argue for the inviolable sovereignty of individual conscience.

I’ve also discussed in my podcast that egalitarians consider themselves having liberty, but they don’t include accountability in their definition.

I think I listened to that one. You are probably right.

Still, there is something to be said for a society that doesn't punish failure so severely that it completely discourages risk-taking. Your position on inheritance tax is a good way to work out this problem, but, unfortunately, it is still too hard a sell for the right, and the left is too far up their own ass with 'justice' to really advocate for it.

[Martin Hash]

I’ve noticed as a candidate that my positions appeal to nobody. Yesterday, a guy I know pretty well, who’s been to my house for dinner recently, blurted out he didn’t vote for me, probably as a trap so I’d ask why and get degraded by the mutterfukker, but I know that ploy all-to-well, so I said: “Don’t think that makes you special; only 1 in 100 people voted for me; you’d be special if you did.”

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

People don't vote for policies, they vote for people - and being a person people want to vote for will require a sacrifice that I don't think you are willing to make.

[Martin Hash]

People don't vote for policies, they vote for people - and being a person people want to vote for will require a sacrifice that I don't think you are willing to make.

Dude, how would you know what people vote for? Jesus, man, that’s so insulting. Almost nobody knows anything about the candidates they vote for; nothing! They vote their tribe; to get to be your tribe’s candidate, you have to give up your integrity. I’ve been my tribe’s candidate before; I’ve had a packed gymnasium all cheering for me; I know the score. There’s no one you know who’s more knowledgable on the subject.

Your assumptions are no better than that mutterfukker eating my food.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

to get to be your tribe’s candidate, you have to give up your integrity.

This is all I am saying. Don't be such a raw nerve.

It is astonishing that you get pissed off at my comment, and then simply repeat what I said.

[Martin Hash]

to get to be your tribe’s candidate, you have to give up your integrity.

This is all I am saying. Don't be such a raw nerve.

It is astonishing that you get pissed off at my comment, and then simply repeat what I said.

That response is transparently false indignation. If that’s what you meant, you would have said it in the post; you’re not blind to online reassurance. In the original draft of my response, I thought of giving you such a charitable interpretation, but you’ve an established record of baiting and accusation. I’m not the first to mention it...

I troll; there’s a difference; I don’t hide it and I don’t deny it if called out. Plus, self-aware people can recognize the irony of a troll, so can opt out.