North Korea News

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: North Korea News

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Mar 11, 2018 8:58 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Oh, then you won't mind if we disenfranchise you, then..
Serious question. Name your preferred politicians that would have made this happen differently.

The question comes from the bogus premise that the politicians we see today exist independent of the electorate.

If, for example, we went by the original rules in which only white men with property could vote, do you honestly believe any of the retards you see out there today would be politicians or, if they did become politicians, do you really believe they would be doing the same things and enacting the same kinds of policies? Probably not.

Let's look at the idea I tabled before, in which the federal government is quite limited and constrained to only foreign policy and defense for the most part, but in order to serve in it or vote in its elections you have to be a veteran. Right away, you know all the politicians were people willing to set aside four years of their lives. That changes the playing field dramatically. We already know that women are not by and large going to enlist, especially if we dropped all the affirmative action rules, quotas, and double standards from the armed forces. Without gibs and special treatment, princess is going to process right the fuck out probably in week 3 of basic training. So right there you are looking at mostly male, with predominant ethnicities being white, black, and Hispanic. Go look at electoral maps isolated for just males. Then look at the maps isolated for black and Hispanic. The black and Hispanic males would drift the electorate a bit to what we now think of as the left, but not crazy out there shit like we see today. Likewise, look at most white male veterans. These days, most of those guys seem to fall into three camps: neocon, libertarian, and now the alt-right to a smaller extent. The right would most likely lean more towards libertarianism and a bit on social conservatism. Alt-Right would definitely be a thing inside elected government itself, unlike now, but not really that big.

Politicians themselves are products that are brought to a political market as a result of supply and demand. When you fuck around with the electorate, you alter the supply and demand forces for various things. The crazier, more degenerate people you allow into the electorate, the crazier and more degenerate politicians you are going to see. It makes no sense to look at the politicians we see now and ask which ones would be in power had the electorate not been drastically altered.

Bring in a shit ton of illiterate immigrants who depend upon social welfare to survive, and who have a huge extended family they want to bring here even though it fucks everything up for the rest of us, and you get jackasses like Luis Gutierrez who is an elected politician that openly states he serves the Latino people only, belongs to an ethno-nationalist organization dedicated to replacing white people in America, and constantly dumps anti-white garbage into the media in order to keep his base voting for him. Guys like that don't just exist in a vacuum. The electorate creates them.

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: North Korea News

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Mar 11, 2018 10:31 pm

Luis Gutierrez is not influencing our foreign policy, or nuclear strategy. The degenerates and immigrants that you fear did not vote for Trump, or anyone that matters in Congress.

My point is that no matter who was elected, this time or the last dozen times, we would still be in the same shithole situation with North Korea - not to mention the Middle East.

You have never been given an actual choice about foreign wars, spending, or anything else. Just social issues.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: North Korea News

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Mar 12, 2018 7:40 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Luis Gutierrez is not influencing our foreign policy, or nuclear strategy. The degenerates and immigrants that you fear did not vote for Trump, or anyone that matters in Congress.

My point is that no matter who was elected, this time or the last dozen times, we would still be in the same shithole situation with North Korea - not to mention the Middle East.

You have never been given an actual choice about foreign wars, spending, or anything else. Just social issues.

You are moving goal posts now.

The situation could be entirely different depending upon the makeup of the electorate. That's the consequence of democracy. When you fuck around with th electorate, you fuck around with the destiny of the nation for as long as the democracy lasts.

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: North Korea News

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Mar 12, 2018 8:03 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Luis Gutierrez is not influencing our foreign policy, or nuclear strategy. The degenerates and immigrants that you fear did not vote for Trump, or anyone that matters in Congress.

My point is that no matter who was elected, this time or the last dozen times, we would still be in the same shithole situation with North Korea - not to mention the Middle East.

You have never been given an actual choice about foreign wars, spending, or anything else. Just social issues.

You are moving goal posts now.

The situation could be entirely different depending upon the makeup of the electorate. That's the consequence of democracy. When you fuck around with th electorate, you fuck around with the destiny of the nation for as long as the democracy lasts.
My goal posts haven't moved an inch. I said basically, 'voting is meaningless'. Your response is that the electorate is 'wrong'.

I'm telling you that if I made you Emperor StA for a day, and you selected which politicians win every election, the result would be the same. They don't give a single fuck about what the "electorate" wants, they just bullshit for a little while during campaign season. There is no "choice" in what happens, other than a bunch of social nonsense that affects nothing. And even that is determined mostly by special interests.

Furthermore, if the only people invested were landowners, how much protesting and demonstrating would there be happening? Landowners (and business owners) are fucking busy paying off their land. They don't have time to stand around screaming, to make something happen.

You have no voice. There was never a choice. Polish your guns, tell yourself stories about tyranny, but it's already over.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: North Korea News

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Mar 12, 2018 8:04 am

If voting is meaningless, then you won't mind if we disenfranchise you. But we all know you would throw a fit if we did that to you.

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: North Korea News

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:21 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:If voting is meaningless, then you won't mind if we disenfranchise you. But we all know you would throw a fit if we did that to you.
Meh. I disenfranchised myself for a decade. Somehow, it made no difference in my life.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: North Korea News

Post by Hastur » Wed Mar 14, 2018 2:07 am

Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Smitty-48 » Wed Mar 14, 2018 2:59 am

There was no peace overture from North Korea, they got to send their athletes to the Olympics even tho they did not qualify, at the behest of the IOC not the North Koreans, just the IOC and South Korea trying to appease the North Koreans while propagating a phoney baloney "peace overture" narrative, PR for the Olympics, but no bearing whatsoever on the strategic outlook.

The Trump summit with North Korea is also phoney baloney, because Trump has inserted the caveat that he will only meet with them "if they de-nuclearize" which is totally unrealistic and not going to happen, so Trump has pre-sabotaged his own "peace overture" by issuing an ultimatum which makes it a non starter before it ever happens, apparently because he has no intention of actually meeting with them and was just throwing up a smokescreen to hijack the news cycle.

This guy further propagates the myth that the North Koreans have acquired nuclear weapons because they fear regime change, which is nonsense, there's no threat of that and never was, the US has had almost 70 years to do that, and didn't even so much as flinch in that direction for fear of a conventional escalation, overwhelming conventional deterrence was fully in effect; long before the North Koreans ever acquired the nukes.

Furthermore, the idea that the North Koreans are somehow caving in to the Americans because of Trumps threats of force, is pure fantasy, the North Koreans are well aware that the Americans are bluffing, so while diplomacy backed by force is a thing, it's not actually in effect when the other side knows you are completely full of shit and not in anyway prepared to back up your threats.

The North Koreans started their nuclear program in the 1980's, it's a forty year project to gain leverage in order to drive a wedge between the South Koreans and the Americans with the purpose of winning the Korean War by driving the Americans off the peninsula and then imposing a confederation on the South, as soon as anybody says "it's cuz regime change, like Saddam and Quaddafy", you instantly know that they don't know what they're talking about and are simply regurgitating a liberal MSM propagated myth.

This is the problem with Americans, they are ignorant, blinded by their self aggrandizing mythology, but they fancy themselves to know all about this and that, which is exactly how they always get themselves into trouble.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: North Korea News

Post by DBTrek » Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:08 am

What Seattle news looks like, for the non-indoctrinated:
If you cave to the NRA, what will you do with North Korea?

... But Kim obviously watches this president very closely. And what has he seen lately? A president who two weeks ago was ready to take on the NRA, but who now has retreated so completely that reporters during Monday’s briefing seemed to be questioning whether he has a spine.

“You talked about supporting universal background checks. About taking guns away from those identified as a threat. What happened to all those proposals?” one reporter asked.

Which raises another question: if you cave to the NRA that quickly, what are you going to do when you’re across the table from a guy with nukes?

http://mynorthwest.com/925044/cave-nra- ... picks=true
:doh:
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: North Korea News

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Mar 26, 2018 10:06 am

Not yet confirmed to be him, but it's someone big.

CIA is probably losing their minds to figure out what gets said in Beijing today.



https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03- ... rise-visit
Kim Jong Un Takes Mystery, High Security Train To Beijing For Surprise Visit
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0