Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Apr 08, 2017 6:54 am

You realize even Ginsburg would kill it if she could?

This really isn't about abortion. That "law" (and that's what they did; it's law from the bench) is horrible.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18586
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Sat Apr 08, 2017 6:58 am

I'm telling you, multiple-reaffirmed precedence is sacrosanct.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Apr 08, 2017 7:00 am

LOL

Isn't that what they said about Dred Scott?

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18586
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Sat Apr 08, 2017 7:02 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:LOL

Isn't that what they said about Dred Scott?
No, Dred Scott is famous because it wasn't upheld.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28231
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by C-Mag » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:04 am

Martin Hash wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Roe v. Wade is walking dead now.
With all the precedence behind it, that seems extremely unlikely.
It would be a very, very, tough fight. There would be blood in the streets. This issue, is a cornerstone to any Dem/Lefty Ideology and frankly, I don't think the GOP or most Americans care enough to take on the fight. And to some extent, I think it is the wrong fight.

What needs to happen is to establish one set of criteria for what life means, because currently we varying criteria. I hate laws that conflict, ie. Your responsible as an adult to decide on our national leaders at 18, but not responsible enough to drink a beer until 21........ WTF

Now, as far as the Pro-Life crowd. Science has been good to them on this issue. Science now can prove that from the moment of conception unique human DNA is formed.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:06 am

Lots of folks thought ending slavery was not worth it too.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18586
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:08 am

The Constitution guarantees life & liberty; SCOTUS had to decide which comes first, and "Give me liberty or give me death" answers the question.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:09 am

Life and liberty.. unless you are declared somebody else's property..

Liberals are a like a broken record on that score. Thanks Taney.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18586
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:11 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:Life and liberty.. unless you are declared somebody else's property..

Liberals are a like a broken record on that score. Thanks Taney.
Somebody's a broken record. This issue has been decided by SCOTUS more than a few times. I say stop playing the fucking record, already.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:13 am

Martin Hash wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Life and liberty.. unless you are declared somebody else's property..

Liberals are a like a broken record on that score. Thanks Taney.
Somebody's a broken record. This issue has been decided by SCOTUS more than a few times. I say stop playing the fucking record, already.

Well, good for you. You decided that baby who could survive outside her mother's womb is not a human being. That ain't any different from how your intellectual forebears thought in antebellum America.

You are repeating the same rhetoric. Muh liberty! Sure. What about the liberty of the millions of people you essentially enslaved and killed with your belief system?