North Korea News

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: North Korea News

Post by DBTrek » Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:44 pm

Every American president who gave an inch of ground to NK based upon their promises to stop developing nuclear weapons has led us to exactly where we are today.

/shrug
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: North Korea News

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:46 pm

Who said anything about giving them an inch of ground?

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: North Korea News

Post by DBTrek » Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:47 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:Who said anything about giving them an inch of ground?
If NK wants to stop without receiving a single concession they’re free to stop right now.
No meeting needed.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25283
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: North Korea News

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:53 pm

DBTrek wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Who said anything about giving them an inch of ground?
If NK wants to stop without receiving a single concession they’re free to stop right now.
No meeting needed.
No they are not. Kim knows as well as anyone what happens when he drops his gun. Sadaam and Ghaddafi are pretty clear and recent examples of what happens when you go back to playing nice.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: North Korea News

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:59 pm

DBTrek wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Who said anything about giving them an inch of ground?
If NK wants to stop without receiving a single concession they’re free to stop right now.
No meeting needed.

What do you mean by concession?

Nobody is going to win this war without losing quite a lot of lives. A peace deal involves both sides conceding something, though obviously we can no longer concede our national security one bit. Previous presidents have been conceding the national security of our country for decades now, and now the little fuckers can potentially wipe out America as a technological entity. Great job, that.

On the other hand, NK can agree to removing their nuclear weapons program, with external inspections and the imminent threat of attack on such facilities when they are found, in exchange for our getting the fuck out of Korea.

We could let China take on South Korea and Russia continue to facilitate their little Nork pets.

It shouldn't even be our problem in the first place.

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Fri Mar 09, 2018 1:56 pm

I honestly believe Trump might be the only president capable of figuring out an acceptable NK solution.

The Kim regime is based entirely in kayfabe, and I don't think any politician in US history has as much insight into kayfabe as Trump.
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: North Korea News

Post by nmoore63 » Fri Mar 09, 2018 1:58 pm

If trump can solve NK, huge hat tip.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Montegriffo » Fri Mar 09, 2018 2:22 pm

What constitutes ''solved'?
Pretty sure NK isn't giving up it's insurance policy against regime change. While they've still got nukes nothing is solved.
Best case scenario is NK gets recognised as a legitimate nation by the US in return for a halt to weapons testing.
Worst case they start calling each other names again and the talks end very quickly.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25283
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: North Korea News

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Mar 09, 2018 2:38 pm

Montegriffo wrote:What constitutes ''solved'?
Pretty sure NK isn't giving up it's insurance policy against regime change. While they've still got nukes nothing is solved.
Best case scenario is NK gets recognised as a legitimate nation by the US in return for a halt to weapons testing.
Worst case they start calling each other names again and the talks end very quickly.
I have no doubt they'll halt testing, for legitimacy. Not much of a trade, imo. They've already achieved what they needed to.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Montegriffo » Fri Mar 09, 2018 2:48 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:What constitutes ''solved'?
Pretty sure NK isn't giving up it's insurance policy against regime change. While they've still got nukes nothing is solved.
Best case scenario is NK gets recognised as a legitimate nation by the US in return for a halt to weapons testing.
Worst case they start calling each other names again and the talks end very quickly.
I have no doubt they'll halt testing, for legitimacy. Not much of a trade, imo. They've already achieved what they needed to.
Yup. Not hard to see Trump being bamboozled by Kim. I know which one I'd most like to face at a poker table.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image