New Zealand - Killer Praised Trump

[Manwithnoname]

Shooter claims to be Australian?

Take that Kiwis

Womp womp.

Gotta help out our cousins over the sea whenever we can.

Not New Zealand.

It's run by liberals.

They are not really loyal to the Queen.

And they hate America.

Not your friends and never were.

Just a mixed up little bro. We are just showing them the light.

[Montegriffo]

Not New Zealand.

It's run by liberals.

Which is why it wasn't a New Zealander who committed this crime.
Had to import an Aussie extremist, radicalised by American hate speech, to shoot up a Mosque.
No better than ISIS.

NZ needs to halt all travel of whites into the country until we can work out what's going on...

[Fife]

A Clockwork Orange is real.

Where do I come into all of this? Am I just some animal or dog?' And that started them off govoreeting real loud and throwing slovos at me.

[Smitty-48]

It's no coincidence that it was identical mosque shootings, first in Canada, then New Zealand, Canada and New Zealand being the most leftist and America hating of all the Anglospehere states.

[Smitty-48]

Not New Zealand.

It's run by liberals.

Which is why it wasn't a New Zealander who committed this crime.
Had to import an Aussie extremist, radicalised by American hate speech, to shoot up a Mosque.
No better than ISIS.

NZ needs to halt all travel of whites into the country until we can work out what's going on...

Americanized Aussie Extremists are my people.

I think his problem is simply autism, not crazy, just mad.

Aspiezatz. Same as the Incels.

[Fife]

Does God want goodness or the choice of goodness? Is a man who chooses to be bad perhaps in some way better than a man who has the good imposed upon him?

[Smitty-48]

Aspietards are one the liberal designated victim classes.

Aspizatz vs Muzzizatz is liberal sob story on liberal sob story violence.

PewPewPewPewDiePie.

Womp womp.

[Montegriffo]

This is where hate speech gets you.
NZ has never had any Islamic terrorist attacks. Last act of terror was the French govt' sinking Rainbow Warrior back in 1985.
This was not a revenge act it is just a nobody egged on by other nobodies on far right internet sites.

did you not read any of his manifesto? you'd know this was a revenge killing for the terror attack in stockholm that killed an 11 year old swedish girl while he was traveling in europe, among other reasons

not saying its justified, just saying it isnt motivated but some vague phrase like hate speech

Hardly surprising he was a victim blaming arsehole.
How many of the perpetrators of the Stockholm attack were in these NZ Mosques?
So he got upset by terrorist attacks. So do I but I don't go and join some online hate group praising the likes of Breivik and Bissonnette.
Clearly, he has been radicalised online.

[Smitty-48]

Terrorist lone wolf self radicalization is what I call the price of freedom.

I'll just walk tall and put my trust in the Lord, death to all Nanny Police States.

[Otern]

"Inspiring", not simply "inciting", huh? See, when someone outright encourages and directs followers to commit murder, sure, arrest them. For inciting murder. But how do you provide the evidence for when someone has inspired a murder, or mass murder for that matter?

You don't solve conflicts in a democratic society by outlawing the voices of the angry, the disaffected, the frustrated, the ones with nothing to lose. No matter what they believe or say. Sweeping the problems under the carpet and carrying on like everything's fine and dandy, doesn't make the dirt go away.

This.

Also, it's really impossible to stop the spread of ideas, without some massive governmental control of the internet. And even then, people will find some cracks to keep communicating with each other.

I still stand by my conviction that it's best to just not give terrorism the attention it demands. It's the best way to fight it. Won't happen as long as people crave misery and clickbait though. I'm just as guilty as everyone else, since I read the articles about this case.

This case looks very similar to the one in Norway in 2011. Lots of the same motivation. But I think we handled it way better than what it looks like New Zealand is going to do now. The parties did their best to not win political points on it here. And even though we did get some political play on it, it happened many years afterwards. New gun law came about 7 years after, but there were very little talk of it in the immediate aftermath.
While in New Zealand, they're already making political points on immigration, gun control, freedom of speech. Before the bodies are buried, or even cold. This is pretty much giving in to terrorism. They might think they're "fighting" terrorism, but in reality, any political decision based on terrorism, is playing into the terrorist's hand. They want political effects, and it doesn't matter which way these political effects hit. In this victim culture, a terrorist will see political change that goes against his ideology as a "win", as it further emphasize his victim status.