Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

[Montegriffo]

Yeah, I'm thin skinned. That's why I never hung around after the first time someone thought it would be funny to call me a child fucker.

[StCapps]

Yeah, I'm thin skinned. That's why I never hung around after the first time someone thought it would be funny to call me a child fucker.

If you cry to the moderator to censor people, than you are thin skinned whiny little bitch by definition. Just because you slung mud back for a little while doesn't make thick skinned, nice try.

[K@th]

Capps, as someone explained earlier, you're not wrong; you're just an asshole. I don't know what terrible things are happening in your life that you feel the need to trash threads that are about topics you have no interest in, but that's who you are.

I can spam your favorite threads, but I find, in general, I:

1. Don't have that kind of time
2. My life is happy; I have no need to ruin fun for others
3. I'm not a dick
4. I'm not an asshole


So, this is who you are. I was trying to make a point.

You're right; it would be wrong for me to mod a thread so the very few of us who want to have a conversation, can have a conversation. It's also your right to be a giant douchebag. So, yeah, in a non moderated forum, you have every right to spam to your heart's content. If ruining shit for others is fun for you, so be it. It really says much more about you than it does about me.

So, here we are. Have you fun. Turn every fucking thread into a hockey thread. At some point; you'll piss off more than just me.

[StCapps]

Capps, as someone explained earlier, you're not wrong; you're just an asshole.

Fine with me.
Liberty > Good Manners.
/shrugs

Fuck the bitches who want to use censorship because they think enforcing good manners are more important than allowing free speech.

[K@th]

Hash doesn't support censorship, Kath is violating his property, she is not protecting it. Moderators betraying the ethos of the forum because of their feelz, that is free speech issue. Hash has the right to censor us and deny us free speech, but he doesn't, for a reason, and Kath's coup d'etat is lame as fuck and you know it.

Martin has the ability and power to demote me at any time he likes. Sweet revenge will be yours the moment he does that.

[StCapps]

Hash doesn't support censorship, Kath is violating his property, she is not protecting it. Moderators betraying the ethos of the forum because of their feelz, that is free speech issue. Hash has the right to censor us and deny us free speech, but he doesn't, for a reason, and Kath's coup d'etat is lame as fuck and you know it.

Martin has the ability and power to demote me at any time he likes. Sweet revenge will be yours the moment he does that.

[K@th]

Hold your breath, Martin will be along any minute now to put me in my proper place.

[Speaker to Animals]

Wasn't actually directed at you, but I guess if you felt it fit...

If you want to apply that "If some forum goers want a thread to debate their topic, they should be able to do so free of other people's spam" -argument to your modus operandi of moderation, go for it. Hopefully you also apply that to more than just topics and threads you, personally, like.

I gotta be honest. I haven't bothered looking through that ridiculous Olympics thread for when you're supposedly "censoring" Capps. I think Capps claims of "censorship" are shrill and absurd, because the Hash forum isn't America. It's private property. No one but one person has a "right" to a goddamn shit in this place. Martin does and he invited us here.

She hasn't censored me yet, but she has threatened to, if I talk hockey in her precious thread after The Olympics are underway. Kath censored clubgop for calling montegriffo a child fucker though, so Kath censoring people is not unprecedented. She won't apply that safe space "logic" to topics she doesn't like though, or she wouldn't try to ruin my MMA thread, she has no principles, just feelz.

She's a shitty moderator and she's undermining the ethos of the forum, as espoused by Martin Hash. If Hash actually believes what he preaches, he would not approve of her conduct as moderator.

She has not and cannot censor you. She can moderate your posts. Moderating a forum isn't censorship, drama queen. Moderating only posts you talk of topics you don't like, while not moderating posts you're ok with, sure, that's inconsistent moderation. But it's a not a "liberty" issue, at least not in the way that you keep babbling about. It's a property issue, not a speech issue. If you crossed the threshold into my home, you don't have any of the liberty afforded to you outside my home, because my home isn't a public sphere. Nor is this place we're conducting a conversation in right now.

As for clubgop keeping on calling monte a pedophile, that's not a free speech issue in any Western democratic country, "even" in the US. The US has libel laws, same as any other democratic country in the world. If one believes a false rape charge warrants criminal prosecution, so should a false pedophile charge, obviously.

Personally, I think clubby's just fantasizing about pedophiles raping his daughters (and sons), a Cuckfather, if you will. Each time clubby's painting a picture of Monte assfucking kids, he's just holding his dick and wanking at the thought of strangers doing to his daughters what he so desperately wishes he could do, but just cannot bring himself to: Rape, beat and humiliate his own daughters. It's just classic projection and probably cathartic for poor, desperate and always angry clubby, too. If Monte's not around to act as a clubby's fantasy of the perfect rapist for his kids, there's no telling what he'd do to them himself, though it'd probably involve charging for access to his daughters. (((*wink wink* *nudge nudge*))) There's a cure for him, of course: Cutting the rest of his dick off.

When she goes in and deletes content from your post, she is literally censoring you, genius.

What makes it outrageous is that she is doing it to people ostensibly for something she herself does all the time. It's selective enforcement of her own arbitrary rules to control who gets to post and what ideas get posted. It's literally censorship.

[StCapps]

When she goes in and deletes content from your post, she is literally censoring you, genius.

Yeah Bjorn is being silly, but knowing you, you probably think I did it all for the dope.

[Speaker to Animals]

When she goes in and deletes content from your post, she is literally censoring you, genius.

Yeah Bjorn is being silly, but knowing you, you probably think I did it all for the dope.

You pretty much do everything for dope, you dopehead.