We had pages of discussion about why I don't think Quebec is a realistic analogy, to which your only response was 'yes it is, there are a lot of whites in Quebec.' There is still a simple way to prove your case by presenting a single example of a race based law in Quebec, but you are either too lazy or too stupid to find it... or, shocker, it doesn't fucking exist.StCapps wrote:Yes you can argue for preserving a culture based on je sanguinis, but not around SIFCLF's who go Godwin's Law on the drop of a hat. They'll accuse you of using Third Reich talking points, if you merely disagree with them, even a little, their mind reflexively jumps to the worse case scenario. If you try to tell them a White Ethno State won't cause the sky to fall, they dismiss you because that type of scenario does not compute in their brains, it isn't dystopic enough for them and they refuse to think of any Ethno State scenarios where the Sky Isn't Falling, fuck reality.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:Because you really can't argue that you want a nation of race-based laws for the preservation of your culture against a cabal of minorities who are responsible for the nation's ills, and then complain when people point out that that looks suspiciously like Reich talking points.
Notice how the refuse to acknowledge Quebec and want to write it off as a unlikely scenario for a Ethno State and Nazi Germany is the more likely outcome.
You don't understand what you are talking about. You lack basic reasoning skills. And you return to a very boring well in every single post. Change the record already, Capps.
