Women make less because men work longer hours, duhhh...

[DBTrek]

No one cares more about the welfare of children than the pro-abortion, gender-reassigning, anti-nuclear-family, pro-drug-needle-exchange, left.
Clearly.

[Speaker to Animals]

It is really not a bad idea to print the carbon footprint of a product on its packaging.

people who do not care will ignore it in the same way fat people ignore the nutrition label. Regulations merely designed to provide accurate information about a product cannot hurt any of you.

My only problem with it is that it does not account for distribution and retail costs after packaging.

[MilSpecs]

females as a role are averse to conflict and confrontation..

No, we just handle it differently. Women confront much more subtly than men and use different methods. Because we don't bluster doesn't mean we're not confronting. I would argue we deal better with conflict.

[Speaker to Animals]

Wait. Hit the breaks.

DrY thinks women are averse to conflict? THE FUCK?

Women thrive on conflict. They just don't like it when we reciprocate it.

[Fife]

females as a role are averse to conflict and confrontation..

No, we just handle it differently. Women confront much more subtly than men and use different methods. Because we don't bluster doesn't mean we're not confronting. I would argue we deal better with conflict.

The struggle is real.

[heydaralon]

females as a role are averse to conflict and confrontation..

I would argue we deal better with conflict.

Definitely don't handle it better lol. Women get angry about stuff and they often do not even know why they are angry. Sometimes, they will even admit it openly. Every man with a wife, mother, or a sister can attest to this. If you are dating a woman, she will say its all good after a fight and then let their anger fester until it starts another one. Rinse and repeat. And that's just open conflict. From my experience, women tend to gossip more and spread fucked up rumors, especially in the workplace. I have confronted women at my workplace about talking shit about me to my boss, and they just get flustered and deny it point blank even if I overheard her saying it. Women are not physically as strong as men, so from an evolutionary standpoint it would make sense for them to not want to initiate a conflict directly, as they would in all likelihood lose. The underhanded sort of dishonorable route is their MO.

[MilSpecs]

females as a role are averse to conflict and confrontation..

I would argue we deal better with conflict.

Definitely don't handle it better lol. Women get angry about stuff and they often do not even know why they are angry. Sometimes, they will even admit it openly. Every man with a wife, mother, or a sister can attest to this. If you are dating a woman, she will say its all good after a fight and then let their anger fester until it starts another one. Rinse and repeat. And that's just open conflict. From my experience, women tend to gossip more and spread fucked up rumors, especially in the workplace. I have confronted women at my workplace about talking shit about me to my boss, and they just get flustered and deny it point blank even if I overheard her saying it. Women are not physically as strong as men, so from an evolutionary standpoint it would make sense for them to not want to initiate a conflict directly, as they would in all likelihood lose. The underhanded sort of dishonorable route is their MO.

Again, this is just a different style and you're not understanding how the conflict is processed and resolved. First, I totally don't get the part about someone not knowing why she's angry. I've never had that experience, nor do any women I'm close to. The fight thing: the conflict wasn't resolved or she's just someone who doesn't let things go. Women grouping together to resolve a conflict is how we do it. Before I go to war, I'm going to make sure I have allies. "Underhanded and dishonorable" is like women saying men are "bullies and creeps." Its just a different way of resolving conflict.

[jediuser598]

More women need to take legislative positions and other places of power. If women are so good at going to war with a coalition at their side, why aren't there more women in positions of political power? If they are better at it than men it follows that there should be.

Why are women choosing not to?

[heydaralon]

I would argue we deal better with conflict.

Definitely don't handle it better lol. Women get angry about stuff and they often do not even know why they are angry. Sometimes, they will even admit it openly. Every man with a wife, mother, or a sister can attest to this. If you are dating a woman, she will say its all good after a fight and then let their anger fester until it starts another one. Rinse and repeat. And that's just open conflict. From my experience, women tend to gossip more and spread fucked up rumors, especially in the workplace. I have confronted women at my workplace about talking shit about me to my boss, and they just get flustered and deny it point blank even if I overheard her saying it. Women are not physically as strong as men, so from an evolutionary standpoint it would make sense for them to not want to initiate a conflict directly, as they would in all likelihood lose. The underhanded sort of dishonorable route is their MO.

Again, this is just a different style and you're not understanding how the conflict is processed and resolved. First, I totally don't get the part about someone not knowing why she's angry. I've never had that experience, nor do any women I'm close to. The fight thing: the conflict wasn't resolved or she's just someone who doesn't let things go. Women grouping together to resolve a conflict is how we do it. Before I go to war, I'm going to make sure I have allies. "Underhanded and dishonorable" is like women saying men are "bullies and creeps." Its just a different way of resolving conflict.

If I have a problem with you, and I say it to your face, that is honorable. If I go behind your back and "ally" with other people of low character by talking shit and so forth without giving you a chance to address it or defend yourself, that is dishonorable. There is no culture or society on Earth that I know of that considers backstabbing and behind your back gossiping as a laudable trait.

Milspecs logic: "That's just how jihadis fight bro. American soldiers will get in uniform, and attack military targets, whereas the Jihadis will intentionally bomb an Ariana Grande Concert and attack civilians. You don't understand. Its not that one of those things is less honorable, they are just different is all."

[MilSpecs]

More women need to take legislative positions and other places of power. If women are so good at going to war with a coalition at their side, why aren't there more women in positions of political power? If they are better at it than men it follows that there should be.

Why are women choosing not to?

There are more all the time, but I can only tell you why I didn't go any further. My family objected.