Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

[K@th]

So, it's really up to Martin if he wants two asshole Canadians ruining his forum. This type of shit is why Dan shut down his forum; he didn't want his name associated with douchebags.

Jackholes, both of them.

Martin Hash likes free speech, Dan Carlin, not so much. Plus Hash has fuck you money, and Dan doesn't, so he needs to worry about his image a lot more or could cost him money. That's what makes Hash cool, he doesn't give if we "ruin" his forum with hockey talk, or talk on any other subject for that matter, he welcomes it. You're just his butthurt moderator contemplating whether he should censor us or not, because you hate freedom of speech too.

You are so freakin' adorable when you work yourself up into a tizzy about shit that hasn't happened. LMAO - Have a great day, Capps.

[StCapps]

So, it's really up to Martin if he wants two asshole Canadians ruining his forum. This type of shit is why Dan shut down his forum; he didn't want his name associated with douchebags.

Jackholes, both of them.

Martin Hash likes free speech, Dan Carlin, not so much. Plus Hash has fuck you money, and Dan doesn't, so he needs to worry about his image a lot more or could cost him money. That's what makes Hash cool, he doesn't give if we "ruin" his forum with hockey talk, or talk on any other subject for that matter, he welcomes it. You're just his butthurt moderator contemplating whether he should censor us or not, because you hate freedom of speech too.

You are so freakin' adorable when you work yourself up into a tizzy about shit that hasn't happened. LMAO - Have a great day, Capps.

You already censored people for child fucker comments, and are threatening to increase how slippery the slope is, because hockey talk entered your precious thread, so fuck you Child Fucking Censorship Cunt and the horse you rode in on.

[K@th]

You say the sweetest things, Capps. I hope you are staying warm up in Canada this winter.

[StCapps]

You say the sweetest things, Capps. I hope you are staying warm up in Canada this winter.

Fucking snowing like a motherfucker up in The Hammer at the moment I tells ya. Ain't that cold though, it's only 22°F (-6°C).

[Montegriffo]

Martin Hash likes free speech, Dan Carlin, not so much. Plus Hash has fuck you money, and Dan doesn't, so he needs to worry about his image a lot more or could cost him money. That's what makes Hash cool, he doesn't give if we "ruin" his forum with hockey talk, or talk on any other subject for that matter, he welcomes it. You're just his butthurt moderator contemplating whether he should censor us or not, because you hate freedom of speech too.

You are so freakin' adorable when you work yourself up into a tizzy about shit that hasn't happened. LMAO - Have a great day, Capps.

You already censored people for child fucker comments, and are threatening to increase how slippery the slope is, because hockey talk entered your precious thread, so fuck you Child Fucking Censorship Cunt and the horse you rode in on.

You never fail to undermine your argument by adding personal insults do you Capps? You know that if your argument were strong enough you wouldn't have to resort to playground behavior.
Yes, child fucker is such a good joke that it warrants retelling a hundred times over 2 years and it's not just a substitute for a good argument.

[StCapps]

You are so freakin' adorable when you work yourself up into a tizzy about shit that hasn't happened. LMAO - Have a great day, Capps.

You already censored people for child fucker comments, and are threatening to increase how slippery the slope is, because hockey talk entered your precious thread, so fuck you Child Fucking Censorship Cunt and the horse you rode in on.

You never fail to undermine your argument by adding personal insults do you Capps? You know that if your argument were strong enough you wouldn't have to resort to playground behavior.
Yes, child fucker is such a good joke that it warrants retelling a hundred times over 2 years and it's not just a substitute for a good argument.

Incorrect. The playground behavior adds to my strong arguments, it doesn't undermine them. If all I had was personal insults and no argument, you'd have a point, but I got plenty of ammo of all kinds, so you don't. Hell even if it did weaken my argument, my argument is so much stronger than the opposition's, that it doesn't matter.

Nice try though.

[Montegriffo]

If all I had was personal insults and no argument, you'd have a point, but I got plenty of ammo of all kinds, so you don't.

That sums up perfectly the vast majority of Clubby's posts about me. No argument of any type just a re-telling of the child fucker ''joke'' over and over again. You support this on grounds of liberty when all it is is forum killing bile.

[StCapps]

If all I had was personal insults and no argument, you'd have a point, but I got plenty of ammo of all kinds, so you don't.

That sums up perfectly the vast majority of Clubby's posts about me. No argument of any type just a re-telling of the child fucker ''joke'' over and over again. You support this on grounds of liberty when all it is is forum killing bile.

Liberty can be messy, but it's vastly preferable to censorship of personal insults, just because you have a thin skin and can't take it, that doesn't change the equation.

[BjornP]

Just because a very small few of us wanted a place to discuss the Olympics.

Wasn't actually directed at you, but I guess if you felt it fit...

If you want to apply that "If some forum goers want a thread to debate their topic, they should be able to do so free of other people's spam" -argument to your modus operandi of moderation, go for it. Hopefully you also apply that to more than just topics and threads you, personally, like.

I gotta be honest. I haven't bothered looking through that ridiculous Olympics thread for when you're supposedly "censoring" Capps. I think Capps claims of "censorship" are shrill and absurd, because the Hash forum isn't America. It's private property. No one but one person has a "right" to a goddamn shit in this place. Martin does and he invited us here.

She hasn't censored me yet, but she has threatened to, if I talk hockey in her precious thread after The Olympics are underway. Kath censored clubgop for calling montegriffo a child fucker though, so Kath censoring people is not unprecedented. She won't apply that safe space "logic" to topics she doesn't like though, or she wouldn't try to ruin my MMA thread, she has no principles, just feelz.

She's a shitty moderator and she's undermining the ethos of the forum, as espoused by Martin Hash. If Hash actually believes what he preaches, he would not approve of her conduct as moderator.

She has not and cannot censor you. She can moderate your posts. Moderating a forum isn't censorship, drama queen. Moderating only posts you talk of topics you don't like, while not moderating posts you're ok with, sure, that's inconsistent moderation. But it's a not a "liberty" issue, at least not in the way that you keep babbling about. It's a property issue, not a speech issue. If you crossed the threshold into my home, you don't have any of the liberty afforded to you outside my home, because my home isn't a public sphere. Nor is this place we're conducting a conversation in right now.

As for clubgop keeping on calling monte a pedophile, that's not a free speech issue in any Western democratic country, "even" in the US. The US has libel laws, same as any other democratic country in the world. If one believes a false rape charge warrants criminal prosecution, so should a false pedophile charge, obviously.

Personally, I think clubby's just fantasizing about pedophiles raping his daughters (and sons), a Cuckfather, if you will. Each time clubby's painting a picture of Monte assfucking kids, he's just holding his dick and wanking at the thought of strangers doing to his daughters what he so desperately wishes he could do, but just cannot bring himself to: Rape, beat and humiliate his own daughters. It's just classic projection and probably cathartic for poor, desperate and always angry clubby, too. If Monte's not around to act as a clubby's fantasy of the perfect rapist for his kids, there's no telling what he'd do to them himself, though it'd probably involve charging for access to his daughters. (((*wink wink* *nudge nudge*))) There's a cure for him, of course: Cutting the rest of his dick off.

[StCapps]

Wasn't actually directed at you, but I guess if you felt it fit...

If you want to apply that "If some forum goers want a thread to debate their topic, they should be able to do so free of other people's spam" -argument to your modus operandi of moderation, go for it. Hopefully you also apply that to more than just topics and threads you, personally, like.

I gotta be honest. I haven't bothered looking through that ridiculous Olympics thread for when you're supposedly "censoring" Capps. I think Capps claims of "censorship" are shrill and absurd, because the Hash forum isn't America. It's private property. No one but one person has a "right" to a goddamn shit in this place. Martin does and he invited us here.

She hasn't censored me yet, but she has threatened to, if I talk hockey in her precious thread after The Olympics are underway. Kath censored clubgop for calling montegriffo a child fucker though, so Kath censoring people is not unprecedented. She won't apply that safe space "logic" to topics she doesn't like though, or she wouldn't try to ruin my MMA thread, she has no principles, just feelz.

She's a shitty moderator and she's undermining the ethos of the forum, as espoused by Martin Hash. If Hash actually believes what he preaches, he would not approve of her conduct as moderator.

She has not and cannot censor you. She can moderate your posts. Moderating a forum isn't censorship, drama queen. Moderating only posts you talk of topics you don't like, while not moderating posts you're ok with, sure, that's inconsistent moderation. But it's a not a "liberty" issue, at least not in the way that you keep babbling about. It's a property issue, not a speech issue. If you crossed the threshold into my home, you don't have any of the liberty afforded to you outside my home, because my home isn't a public sphere. Nor is this place we're conducting a conversation in right now.

As for clubgop keeping on calling monte a pedophile, that's not a free speech issue in any Western democratic country, "even" in the US. The US has libel laws, same as any other democratic country in the world. If one believes a false rape charge warrants criminal prosecution, so should a false pedophile charge, obviously.

Personally, I think clubby's just fantasizing about pedophiles raping his daughters (and sons), a Cuckfather, if you will. Each time clubby's painting a picture of Monte assfucking kids, he's just holding his dick and wanking at the thought of strangers doing to his daughters what he so desperately wishes he could do, but just cannot bring himself to: Rape, beat and humiliate his own daughters. It's just classic projection and probably cathartic for poor, desperate and always angry clubby, too. If Monte's not around to act as a clubby's fantasy of the perfect rapist for his kids, there's no telling what he'd do to them himself, though it'd probably involve charging for access to his daughters. (((*wink wink* *nudge nudge*))) There's a cure for him, of course: Cutting the rest of his dick off.

Hash doesn't support censorship, Kath is violating his property, she is not protecting it. Moderators betraying the ethos of the forum because of their feelz, that is free speech issue. Hash has the right to censor us and deny us free speech, but he doesn't, for a reason, and Kath's coup d'etat is lame as fuck and you know it.