Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Kavanaugh will always be tinged by this, the next time the SC rules on anything involving assault, school, beer, sex, women, men, humans or trans-humans, you can bet there will be internet articles bemoaning the accused sex fiend Brett Kavanaughty and his drunk ramblings from the court
-
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I was a child when Clinton was president.clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:14 amSure you weren't. Amazing isnt it Bill Clinton won two elections and no one admits to ever voting for him. In order to prove the weakness of Clinton and Kavanaugh, you yourself became more of a weasel than the two of them combined. A Bernie bro huh? So you gracefully accept being stolen from and sidelined by the Clintons? They like myself don't need you compliments just your acquiescence. You can call me whatever names you want, just take your beach house and get the fuck out of the way.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Sun Oct 07, 2018 8:24 amCould be an affectionate nickname for his grandma, prove it wasn’t.
Maybe it wasn’t his grandma. There’s only one miss lewinsky in the world?
He’s the president, he’s met tens of thousands of people, a lewinsky here, a lewinsky there. Prove he didn’t meet more than one miss lewinsky.
Oh, but I see you admitted your guy is a Clinton level weasel. That’s good, I never liked either of the clintons anyway, I’m a Bernie bro, i wasnt defending Bill in comparing him to your guy, I was condemning him, because I’m not a hypocrite.
I was demonstrating weasel logic in regards to Clinton to make a point.
It’s Weasley of you to pretend otherwise, but then look who you support.
I get why you love politics, you get to personally attach yourself to a party and feel good about things that have nothing to do with you. It’s kind of silly when you think about it, but it’s cool that you have a hobby, I guess.
-
- Posts: 18669
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
There was a Rape File for every potential nominee. It doesn’t make any difference who was selected, hell, Kavanaugh will protect Roe, any male would be a “rapist.”
p.s. It will be interesting to see what despicable slur they use on the next nominee, which you know will be a Conservative female.
p.s. It will be interesting to see what despicable slur they use on the next nominee, which you know will be a Conservative female.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I heard about the accusations here, at first I was like, wow, democrats must be on a witch hunt, because the mhf says the accusation is bs and has no teeth. But then I read about his testimony being deceptive and it made me wonder why he didn’t just speak honestly, sure he would have had to admit to being a drunken frat boy, but that’s not a crime, that’s a human thing, and it sounds like he was also a hard working student. Being forthright would at least prove him to be a man of integrity. it wasn’t a criminal trial, his life wasn’t on the line. it was basically a job interview, did he want to be on the Supreme Court so bad he was willing to bend the truth? That’s what bugs me about this thing.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:29 amKavanaugh will always be tinged by this, the next time the SC rules on anything involving assault, school, beer, sex, women, men, humans or trans-humans, you can bet there will be internet articles bemoaning the accused sex fiend Brett Kavanaughty and his drunk ramblings from the court
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
You’re more upset that a man would speak carefully to achieve has lifelong ambition of being one of nine Supreme Court justices, than that multiple women would accuse someone of rape, forced fellatio, and gang rape without a shred of evidence or corroborating testimony?
Well, I guess that sums up the divide in this country.
Some of us are mad that evil people will stop at nothing to destroy their opponents on the public stage, even stopping so low as to level the most vile of accusations. Others of us are mad that people accused of heinous crimes (without evidence) mince their words carefully.
Guess it all comes down to which side of the witch hunt mob you’re on.
/shrug
Well, I guess that sums up the divide in this country.
Some of us are mad that evil people will stop at nothing to destroy their opponents on the public stage, even stopping so low as to level the most vile of accusations. Others of us are mad that people accused of heinous crimes (without evidence) mince their words carefully.
Guess it all comes down to which side of the witch hunt mob you’re on.
/shrug
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
My guess. Slut.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:32 amThere was a Rape File for every potential nominee. It doesn’t make any difference who was selected, hell, Kavanaugh will protect Roe, any male would be a “rapist.”
p.s. It will be interesting to see what despicable slur they use on the next nominee, which you know will be a Conservative female.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I think he spoke deceptively because he wants the job, same reason he wouldn't come out and directly support another FBI investigation. It's the one answer that he couldn't give to the democrats grilling him into delaying and jeopardizing his confirmation yet another week. He knows how close the vote will be, he has to do whatever he can to defend himself, he can't let himself be seen as a drunken frat boy, even being seen as a drunken high school student who drinks beer is bad enough when youre accused of committing drunken acts as a high school student. He likes beer. He still drinks beer. So do I. I'm not so sure I would be able to stand by my beer drinking record if I was at the job interview of my life.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:43 amI heard about the accusations here, at first I was like, wow, democrats must be on a witch hunt, because the mhf says the accusation is bs and has no teeth. But then I read about his testimony being deceptive and it made me wonder why he didn’t just speak honestly, sure he would have had to admit to being a drunken frat boy, but that’s not a crime, that’s a human thing, and it sounds like he was also a hard working student. Being forthright would at least prove him to be a man of integrity. it wasn’t a criminal trial, his life wasn’t on the line. it was basically a job interview, did he want to be on the Supreme Court so bad he was willing to bend the truth? That’s what bugs me about this thing.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:29 amKavanaugh will always be tinged by this, the next time the SC rules on anything involving assault, school, beer, sex, women, men, humans or trans-humans, you can bet there will be internet articles bemoaning the accused sex fiend Brett Kavanaughty and his drunk ramblings from the court
Also I don't like the job interview analogy either because while it isn't a criminal matter, the innocent until proven guilty principle still applies imo
I think he could have done it, who knows? I sure don't.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
As was I, that is no excuse that you could not draw lessons from it. You got caught cucked bu the Clinton's as an adult. What's your excuse for that? I love how you feign detachment and pretend you dont care about this shit. Why do you post here? Are you that much a glutton for punishment, that you take the side of every smug loser ever? "Dont blame me I voted for the loser." You have a Gore Lieberman bumper sticker on your car to signal your virtue. You are a slut for misery.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:30 amI was a child when Clinton was president.clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:14 amSure you weren't. Amazing isnt it Bill Clinton won two elections and no one admits to ever voting for him. In order to prove the weakness of Clinton and Kavanaugh, you yourself became more of a weasel than the two of them combined. A Bernie bro huh? So you gracefully accept being stolen from and sidelined by the Clintons? They like myself don't need you compliments just your acquiescence. You can call me whatever names you want, just take your beach house and get the fuck out of the way.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Sun Oct 07, 2018 8:24 am
Could be an affectionate nickname for his grandma, prove it wasn’t.
Maybe it wasn’t his grandma. There’s only one miss lewinsky in the world?
He’s the president, he’s met tens of thousands of people, a lewinsky here, a lewinsky there. Prove he didn’t meet more than one miss lewinsky.
Oh, but I see you admitted your guy is a Clinton level weasel. That’s good, I never liked either of the clintons anyway, I’m a Bernie bro, i wasnt defending Bill in comparing him to your guy, I was condemning him, because I’m not a hypocrite.
I was demonstrating weasel logic in regards to Clinton to make a point.
It’s Weasley of you to pretend otherwise, but then look who you support.
I get why you love politics, you get to personally attach yourself to a party and feel good about things that have nothing to do with you. It’s kind of silly when you think about it, but it’s cool that you have a hobby, I guess.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Honestly, if the vague assault accusation had indeed taken him down, it would feel like a hollow victory to me, speaking as someone that isn't super stoked about him being on the court in the first place. You can't take him out based on his job performance so we'll take him out with a crying women? Weak
It's like when Glenn Thrush (Politico) was outed in the Wikileaks emails for being a self-admitted "hack" when he was forwarding his stories to John Podesta ahead of their publishing to allow the Clinton campaign to formulate a response. He still worked as a journalist (in the White House briefing room!) up until last year when he faced sexual misconduct allegations and either lost his job or was suspended or demoted, I forgot
Not saying that either of these men don't deserve some consequence from abusing women, assuming they did it, but I get no satisfaction from taking them out that way
It's like when Glenn Thrush (Politico) was outed in the Wikileaks emails for being a self-admitted "hack" when he was forwarding his stories to John Podesta ahead of their publishing to allow the Clinton campaign to formulate a response. He still worked as a journalist (in the White House briefing room!) up until last year when he faced sexual misconduct allegations and either lost his job or was suspended or demoted, I forgot
What a hollow fucking victory. We can't take this guy out on being a fucking corrupt journalist but we can take him out in the #metoo whirlwind of accusations? Fuck that, that's weak"Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u," Thrush writes to Podesta. "Please don't share or tell anyone I did this Tell me if I f****d up anything."
Not saying that either of these men don't deserve some consequence from abusing women, assuming they did it, but I get no satisfaction from taking them out that way
-
- Posts: 1018
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 1:06 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Im juss chillin. Why do I need an excuse for things that are out of my control?clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Oct 07, 2018 11:24 amAs was I, that is no excuse that you could not draw lessons from it. You got caught cucked bu the Clinton's as an adult. What's your excuse for that? I love how you feign detachment and pretend you dont care about this shit. Why do you post here? Are you that much a glutton for punishment, that you take the side of every smug loser ever? "Dont blame me I voted for the loser." You have a Gore Lieberman bumper sticker on your car to signal your virtue. You are a slut for misery.JohnDonne wrote: ↑Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:30 amI was a child when Clinton was president.clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:14 am
Sure you weren't. Amazing isnt it Bill Clinton won two elections and no one admits to ever voting for him. In order to prove the weakness of Clinton and Kavanaugh, you yourself became more of a weasel than the two of them combined. A Bernie bro huh? So you gracefully accept being stolen from and sidelined by the Clintons? They like myself don't need you compliments just your acquiescence. You can call me whatever names you want, just take your beach house and get the fuck out of the way.
I was demonstrating weasel logic in regards to Clinton to make a point.
It’s Weasley of you to pretend otherwise, but then look who you support.
I get why you love politics, you get to personally attach yourself to a party and feel good about things that have nothing to do with you. It’s kind of silly when you think about it, but it’s cool that you have a hobby, I guess.