Wouldn't have mattered even if they sunk the carriers.brewster wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 11:07 amActually, there's a pretty good argument that the losses at Pearl weren't strategically significant. Battlewagons were no longer capital ships and our carriers were at sea. Plus, many of the "sunk" ships were in shallow water and refitted within the year or sooner.
The American arm of decision was industrial might.
America could build a navy to beat the Japanese, several times over.
Soon as the sleeping giant awoke, it was game over for the Axis, just a matter of time.