
Unless you went back to delete your posts, it's all there in the forum database.
No, I remember it. Busted capps is busted.StCapps wrote:There was no electromagnetism debate, that was all in StA's head, arguing against figments of his imagination. His reading comprehension is really bad and he delusionally thinks he won that thread. The MIC is not against EMP hardening, they stand to make a profit off it.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
Yeah and everyone can read how shitty your interpretation of what I was saying really is, still not a single person has backed your interpretation of my remarks, while many have backed up my interpretation. Everybody knows that you lost, except you, you're still in denial.Speaker to Animals wrote:![]()
Unless you went back to delete your posts, it's all there in the forum database.
When did I ever say that EMP wasn't a thing? That's in StA's head. You incorrectly remember, if that is your recollection, you remember StA raving for pages against a strawman, you don't remember my arguments.Okeefenokee wrote:No, I remember it. Busted capps is busted.StCapps wrote:There was no electromagnetism debate, that was all in StA's head, arguing against figments of his imagination. His reading comprehension is really bad and he delusionally thinks he won that thread. The MIC is not against EMP hardening, they stand to make a profit off it.
Liar. I denied that 90% lethality was a thing, not that EMP is a thing that exists, you're an idiot.Speaker to Animals wrote:You flat out denied it was possible Capps. lol.
I already did that, and right now I am just waiting for you to finally accept the meaning of the word idealism in the broader context outside of just philosophy, instead of pretending that the only way to use the word idealism is in the context of philosophy.Speaker to Animals wrote:Right now I am just waiting for you to finally accept the meaning of the word Idealism in the context of philosophy.
We were not talking about another context. We were essentially talking about the conflict between moral realism and moral idealism, with you calling the moral realists the idealists.StCapps wrote:I already did that, and right now I am just waiting for you to finally accept the meaning of the word idealism in the broader context outside of just philosophy.Speaker to Animals wrote:Right now I am just waiting for you to finally accept the meaning of the word Idealism in the context of philosophy.
Yes we are talking about another context, I was the one brought up idealism, I know what context I was using it the term in, and it was not purely in a philosophical sense that I was using it. You are hijacking the thread to talk about something else entirely while pretending that thing you are talking about, is what was being discussed all along, but it isn't. You're reading comprehension is beyond awful, shut the fuck up until you can grasp basic conversation without interrupting with your autistic screeching.Speaker to Animals wrote:We were not talking about another context. We were essentially talking about the conflict between moral realism and moral idealism, with you calling the moral realists the idealists.