Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14775
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Sun Oct 07, 2018 4:59 am

Otern wrote:
Sun Oct 07, 2018 12:19 am
JohnDonne wrote:
Sat Oct 06, 2018 11:09 pm
Let’s begin with Kavanaugh’s denial.

Here is what he says: “I never attended a gathering like the one Dr. Ford describes in her allegation.”
It turns out he did though, according to his own calendars, with most of the same people Ford says were there.

He is deceptive and manipulative throughout the hearing, and the article goes into great detail on these points. If you want to know how Bill Clinton Weasley this guy is, read the article.
"A gathering like the one Dr. Ford describes in her allegation" can mean a gathering with a little bit of attempted rape. So not really a lie, even if he did attend a party where those people attended, which has also not been proven.
Seriously? How many straws do you people need to reach for before you realize she was nothing more than a Democrat plant?

Want proof?

She is no longer moving forward with her alligations legally... she has 500k+ to do it with, it nope...

That was her payoff.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Oct 07, 2018 5:41 am

JohnDonne wrote:
Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:24 pm
He lied under oath.
Good. Good. Let the pussy jihad commence.

Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Oct 07, 2018 6:00 am

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/1 ... -pictures/


Oh wow. They are giving us another round of liberal tears photos.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Oct 07, 2018 6:04 am

This guy is going to be so fucking red pilled after what they did to him.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by clubgop » Sun Oct 07, 2018 7:01 am

If you want to know how Bill Clinton Weasley this guy is, read the article.
Might want to get some ice on that. So when the wife runs for President you'll blindly support her and rig your primary system, again, to guarantee her nomination? Cool.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by clubgop » Sun Oct 07, 2018 7:02 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Oct 07, 2018 3:24 am
A constitution can be worthless if you can't change it due to the political climate.
Maybe if you learned to read, you would know there is a process for that.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Oct 07, 2018 7:24 am

Otern wrote:
Sun Oct 07, 2018 4:07 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Sun Oct 07, 2018 3:24 am
A constitution can be worthless if you can't change it due to the political climate.
I'd say that's what makes a constitution valuable. You're not supposed to be able to change it with a minor majority. A constitution function as a check to rash democratic decisions, it's supposed to be really hard to change. It's what protects against mob rule.

If the original meaning doesn't apply, the constitution can be rendered worthless through changes in attitudes, culture, language, whatever.

Norway is pretty bad at following the original intent, which has made our constitution practically worthless. We joined NATO, even though it was against our constitution. And recently, the new gun law had three clear breaches on the constitution, without any opposition.

If anyone want to change the constitution, sure, go ahead, through the proper channels. But a constitution should be the supreme law of the land, and it shouldn't change its meaning based on who's got the majority in parliament at any moment.
Not having a codeified constitution like everyone else our Constitution comes mostly from Parliamentary law.
This means it can only be charged by open debate and vote amongst elected representatives.
I don't fully understand the difference to a written constitution in practice but l'm not enamored by the idea of a set in stone constitution written around the time of the industrial Revolution.
Laws and rules need to adapt to the changing times every now and then.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Oct 07, 2018 7:26 am

That's how you lost your human rights just in the course of a few decades, though. Hard pass. Have fun with it, though.

I prefer to make it nigh impossible to abridge our human rights. I am unhappy with how easily our own constitution is ignored and, when we get a convention, my hope is that my part of North America makes it almost impossible to abridge our human rights at all.

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Fife » Sun Oct 07, 2018 7:32 am

Things really are rather funny and entertaining, tho.

:lol:

https://twitter.com/Slate/status/1048787929898934277

Image
Last edited by Fife on Sun Oct 07, 2018 7:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Fife » Sun Oct 07, 2018 7:39 am

Keep shitting in your hands, commies. They aren't nearly full yet. Don't deprive us of the entertainment.

:goteam: :drunk:

Image