Net Neutrality

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25289
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sat Nov 25, 2017 1:33 pm

The Conservative wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
Because they keep eating each other up.
Yet pricing is nearly identical, and data speeds are the same.
Not really, there are multiple groups out there, but it all depends how you want to play the game.
You can buy service from a dozen different "providers", but they're all renting from the Big 2. Your signal is carried on one or the other.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14797
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by The Conservative » Sat Nov 25, 2017 1:53 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Yet pricing is nearly identical, and data speeds are the same.
Not really, there are multiple groups out there, but it all depends how you want to play the game.
You can buy service from a dozen different "providers", but they're all renting from the Big 2. Your signal is carried on one or the other.
So which do you think are the big two?
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25289
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:01 pm

The Conservative wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
Not really, there are multiple groups out there, but it all depends how you want to play the game.
You can buy service from a dozen different "providers", but they're all renting from the Big 2. Your signal is carried on one or the other.
So which do you think are the big two?
Verizon and ATT. Sprint has less than 1/3rd of either of them, and uses ATT's network, IIRC.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14797
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by The Conservative » Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:02 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
You can buy service from a dozen different "providers", but they're all renting from the Big 2. Your signal is carried on one or the other.
So which do you think are the big two?
Verizon and ATT. Sprint has less than 1/3rd of either of them, and uses ATT's network, IIRC.
Might want to look that up again.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25289
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:21 pm

The Conservative wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
So which do you think are the big two?
Verizon and ATT. Sprint has less than 1/3rd of either of them, and uses ATT's network, IIRC.
Might want to look that up again.
Here. Look at the host networks. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of ... _operators

By subscribers:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of ... _providers
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14797
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by The Conservative » Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:29 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Verizon and ATT. Sprint has less than 1/3rd of either of them, and uses ATT's network, IIRC.
Might want to look that up again.
Here. Look at the host networks. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of ... _operators

By subscribers:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of ... _providers

Please do, there are at least four by your links.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25289
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:34 pm

The Conservative wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
Might want to look that up again.
Here. Look at the host networks. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of ... _operators

By subscribers:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of ... _providers

Please do, there are at least four by your links.
And, as I said, there are 2 distinct protocols used. I believe Sprint is using Verizon’s protocol, and T-Mobile uses ATTs.

They are incompatible, and require entirely separate networks.
https://www.myrateplan.com/cell_phone_b ... technology
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:47 pm

That was the 2000s and that's the network architecture. I helped build iDEN. As far as I know, it's still widely used in some parts of the world due to cost effectiveness, especially relating to range.

These says, it's all about GSM and the latest version of CDMA.

Just because a network uses the GSM architecture does not mean it's all part of one thing. I think AT&T and T Mobile both use GSM but they each own their own network. Verizon is CDMA. CDMA does not really compete well with GSM.

CDMA is like the Model T to GSM's Tesla.

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by nmoore63 » Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:08 am

Did this thread make any new points about NN that we didn’t hash out in the thread on the DCF?

Penner
Posts: 3350
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Penner » Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:49 am

Here is the article that I posted earlier about NN:
On Tuesday, the US Federal Communications Commission announced that it planned to vote on an order to roll back Obama-era rules governing net neutrality.

Simply put, net neutrality means that all data on the internet is treated equally. An internet service provider can't prioritize certain companies or types of data, charge users more to access certain websites and apps, or charge businesses for preferential access.

Advocates of net neutrality argue that it ensures a level playing field for everyone on the internet. Telecoms firms, however, are largely against it because of the additional restrictions it places on them.

But with the Republican-majority FCC likely to vote on December 14 in favor of rolling back the order, what might the American internet look like without net neutrality? Just look at Portugal.

The country's wireless carrier Meo offers a package that's very different from those available in the US. Users pay for traditional "data" — and on top of that, they pay for additional packages based on the kind of data and apps they want to use.
http://www.businessinsider.com/net-neut ... cc-2017-11

I also find it amazing that a number of people are so willing to let NN to die. It's like they don't like any protections and are willingly fine with their elected representatives voting away things that are design to not allow companies to screw you out of your money, rights, and property.
Image