-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Thu Dec 22, 2016 1:19 pm
Montegriffo wrote:Ah, no denial of your dishonesty I see, just a diversionary video that I'm not even going to watch as you are a discredited hack and I imagine it is more of the same exaggeration and outright lies.
Learn to debate honestly or sod off back to your safe space.
WTF?
Diversionary? Did they not attack those Christians? They went to jail for those crimes, genius. One of them was caught creeping on women too. Some great people you stand with, Monty.
-
ssu
- Posts: 2142
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:05 pm
Post
by ssu » Thu Dec 22, 2016 1:43 pm
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Dec 22, 2016 2:08 pm
Let us mourn the failed state of Sweden... they were a proud and noble people.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Thu Dec 22, 2016 2:18 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:Montegriffo wrote:Ah, no denial of your dishonesty I see, just a diversionary video that I'm not even going to watch as you are a discredited hack and I imagine it is more of the same exaggeration and outright lies.
Learn to debate honestly or sod off back to your safe space.
WTF?
Diversionary? Did they not attack those Christians? They went to jail for those crimes, genius. One of them was caught creeping on women too. Some great people you stand with, Monty.
They defended themselves and their 17 year old festival from a bunch of marauding Christian zealots, I have no issue with that.
Again the link to the Dearborn free press article
http://dearbornfreepress.com/2012/07/01 ... d-on-pole/
Last edited by Montegriffo on Thu Dec 22, 2016 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Thu Dec 22, 2016 2:20 pm
Wow.
Now we are getting to the true motivations of our resident marxists. \
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Thu Dec 22, 2016 2:22 pm
Okay. So we got them to admit some nastiness in their motivations.
These were Christians who were exercising their freedom of speech, which is among the chief principles of American government and our social contract, who were viciously attacked by mobs of Muslims. The fact that this demonstrates that these Muslims do NOT have any business in this country because they failed to integrate and have no intention of adopting American values and basic standards was entirely missed by our marxists. No. The marxists were happy the Christians got attacked. The Christians had it coming..
Wow.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Thu Dec 22, 2016 2:23 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:Wow.
Now we are getting to the true motivations of our resident marxists. \
Notice how nobody is coming to your defence? Also notice that many people are calling you out on your bullshit. You are either Wrong or in the wrong place, or both.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Thu Dec 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Montegriffo wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:Wow.
Now we are getting to the true motivations of our resident marxists. \
Notice how nobody is coming to your defence? Also notice that many people are calling you out on your bullshit. You are either Wrong or in the wrong place, or both.
I don't have anything nice to say so I'm just sitting it out.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Thu Dec 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:Okay. So we got them to admit some nastiness in their motivations.
These were Christians who were exercising their freedom of speech, which is among the chief principles of American government and our social contract, who were viciously attacked by mobs of Muslims. The fact that this demonstrates that these Muslims do NOT have any business in this country because they failed to integrate and have no intention of adopting American values and basic standards was entirely missed by our marxists. No. The marxists were happy the Christians got attacked. The Christians had it coming..
Wow.
The radical Christians were trying to disrupt the right of citizens to carry out a peaceful festival. I couldn't care less about which imaginary God either side believes in but trying to disrupt another faiths festival on some twisted religious grounds is wrong and if you weren't so blinded by your bigotry you would see that.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Thu Dec 22, 2016 2:38 pm
Montegriffo wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:Okay. So we got them to admit some nastiness in their motivations.
These were Christians who were exercising their freedom of speech, which is among the chief principles of American government and our social contract, who were viciously attacked by mobs of Muslims. The fact that this demonstrates that these Muslims do NOT have any business in this country because they failed to integrate and have no intention of adopting American values and basic standards was entirely missed by our marxists. No. The marxists were happy the Christians got attacked. The Christians had it coming..
Wow.
The radical Christians were trying to disrupt the right of citizens to carry out a peaceful festival. I couldn't care less about which imaginary God either side believes in but trying to disrupt another faiths festival on some twisted religious grounds is wrong and if you weren't so blinded by your bigotry you would see that.
They did no such thing. They might have expressed speach you find offensive, but they deprived nobody their rights.
Interesting that you align with the motivations of terrorists now..
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Thu Dec 22, 2016 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.