Meh. I have yet to understand any actual function of that ‘office’, other than ceremonial.Kath wrote: Sat May 19, 2018 3:54 pmSometimes Clubby is right. That's a pretty retarded thing to say.GrumpyCatFace wrote: Sat May 19, 2018 3:44 pm He stands up and waves pretty good. Those are the job requirements.
Royal Wedding
-
- Posts: 25408
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Royal Wedding
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Royal Wedding
I will only a accept a warrior monarch who is willing to go on crusades. Non-warrior monarchs and non-crusader royals are an anathema.
-
- Posts: 28382
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Royal Wedding
Harry is probably your guy thenSpeaker to Animals wrote: Sat May 19, 2018 5:41 pm I will only a accept a warrior monarch who is willing to go on crusades. Non-warrior monarchs and non-crusader royals are an anathema.
PLATA O PLOMO

Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am
Re: Royal Wedding
Since you don't know how the primary works in this country, zero people are surprised that you don't know the function of a monarch in another country. So, your opinion on the value is fairly useless.GrumpyCatFace wrote: Sat May 19, 2018 4:28 pmMeh. I have yet to understand any actual function of that ‘office’, other than ceremonial.Kath wrote: Sat May 19, 2018 3:54 pm
Sometimes Clubby is right. That's a pretty retarded thing to say.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?
-
- Posts: 25408
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Royal Wedding
Name one actual power held by the office.
I'll wait.
I'll wait.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Royal Wedding
Power to dissolve Parliament.
-
- Posts: 25408
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Royal Wedding
And what would happen if the Queen decided to actually do so? Issued a royal proclamation tomorrow, said 'no more Parliament'?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Royal Wedding
So we've moved on from your assertion that this office has no power?GrumpyCatFace wrote: Sat May 19, 2018 9:49 pmAnd what would happen if the Queen decided to actually do so? Issued a royal proclamation tomorrow, said 'no more Parliament'?
-
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am
Re: Royal Wedding
It's a different sort of separation of power. Everyone blathers on about Obama being a good head of state. Perhaps if he had been a head of state while someone more qualified did the business of running this country, that may have been true. (I still think he tripped his tongue too much to be considered an excellent statesman.)
She doesn't have a ton of real power, true, but, in the case of a constitutional crisis, she has the power to tell parliament to go away and call for a special election. A final check and balance.
I'm making no commentary on the goodness or badness of having a birth-right monarchy in place, just telling you there's more to the job than waving. If her country thinks she adds value, than she adds value. The monarchy does a lot for charity, too.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?