Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25284
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sat Mar 10, 2018 1:22 pm

clubgop wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Hwen Hoshino wrote: We are gonna still pretend that school is the only source even now?
Of course not. But if you can’t even finish college, then you shouldn’t be a federal anything.

So far as actual knowledge, sure - it’s not necessary. But we need some kind of baseline here.
Wow look at the goalpost moving here. At first we were defending the Ivy league elite but then 1 innocent question and now a janitor has to at least finish college.
Not sure that a janitor would be part of the ‘federal judiciary’ that we were discussing, but thank you for your contribution, Donnie.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?

Post by clubgop » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:57 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
clubgop wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Of course not. But if you can’t even finish college, then you shouldn’t be a federal anything.

So far as actual knowledge, sure - it’s not necessary. But we need some kind of baseline here.
Wow look at the goalpost moving here. At first we were defending the Ivy league elite but then 1 innocent question and now a janitor has to at least finish college.
Not sure that a janitor would be part of the ‘federal judiciary’ that we were discussing, but thank you for your contribution, Donnie.
Nice try. Someone who doesn't finish college shouldn't be a federal anything. That was your quote that is what you said. Do you do any research before commenting in anything? Do you ever get anything right? Do you ever take personal responsibility? Are you ever honest? No, but thank you for your contribution, bitch.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:20 pm

Guess that rules out Abraham Lincoln.

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25284
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:25 pm

clubgop wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
clubgop wrote:
Wow look at the goalpost moving here. At first we were defending the Ivy league elite but then 1 innocent question and now a janitor has to at least finish college.
Not sure that a janitor would be part of the ‘federal judiciary’ that we were discussing, but thank you for your contribution, Donnie.
Nice try. Someone who doesn't finish college shouldn't be a federal anything. That was your quote that is what you said. Do you do any research before commenting in anything? Do you ever get anything right? Do you ever take personal responsibility? Are you ever honest? No, but thank you for your contribution, bitch.
AAB043E3-AEE8-4188-B7B8-3D40FFC18B2F.jpeg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?

Post by clubgop » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:54 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
clubgop wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Not sure that a janitor would be part of the ‘federal judiciary’ that we were discussing, but thank you for your contribution, Donnie.
Nice try. Someone who doesn't finish college shouldn't be a federal anything. That was your quote that is what you said. Do you do any research before commenting in anything? Do you ever get anything right? Do you ever take personal responsibility? Are you ever honest? No, but thank you for your contribution, bitch.
AAB043E3-AEE8-4188-B7B8-3D40FFC18B2F.jpeg
Undercover hack censorship bitch says what? Suck tha dick up till you hiccup.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Mar 10, 2018 8:30 pm

Harry Truman.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?

Post by clubgop » Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:17 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:Guess that rules out Abraham Lincoln.
GrumpyCatFace wrote: An Illinois hick gun nut that suspended habeas corpus good riddance.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?

Post by clubgop » Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:23 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:Harry Truman.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:A Missourian hick no nothing that nuked the Japanese, good riddance.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:35 pm

clubgop wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Guess that rules out Abraham Lincoln.
GrumpyCatFace wrote: An Illinois hick gun nut that suspended habeas corpus good riddance.

Technically a broadsword nut.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?

Post by clubgop » Sat Mar 10, 2018 11:37 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
clubgop wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Guess that rules out Abraham Lincoln.
GrumpyCatFace wrote: An Illinois hick gun nut that suspended habeas corpus good riddance.

Technically a broadsword nut.
That to me sounded like good judgement too bad Mr. bench warrant= entrapment doesn't think so.