Real Rules?

Do you support any of the below rules for decorum on the forum?

Do not shit on Martin and do not shit in his threads.
7
21%
The owner of a thread gets to decide when the off-topic detour becomes disruptive/spam
6
18%
No hardcore porn, including descriptive text
8
24%
None of the above
12
36%
 
Total votes: 33

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th » Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:26 pm

StCapps wrote:It was joke that you didn't like, so you censored it. nukedog is just an anti-semite, obvious hostile witness against clubby is obvious.
It's nice that you would take a chance with Hash's property and liberty, concerning illegal activity. Perhaps I'm not willing to let that risk stand.
Account abandoned.

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Real Rules?

Post by TheReal_ND » Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:27 pm

Im sorry but the facts are apparent. You may not like it but this is what peak red pilling looks like.
Last edited by TheReal_ND on Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:27 pm

Kath wrote:
StCapps wrote:It was joke that you didn't like, so you censored it. nukedog is just an anti-semite, obvious hostile witness against clubby is obvious.
It's nice that you would take a chance with Hash's property and liberty, concerning illegal activity. Perhaps I'm not willing to let that risk stand.
clubgop dindu nuffin, fuck you.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:09 pm

We've been stuck on 200 members for months. Only 5 people in the last 2 pages of members have actually posted. If the liberty to call regular posters child fuckers is more important than attracting new posters go ahead. I don't think it's any way to build the forum, I think it is juvenile and offensive and would get you a punch in the face in real life.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25293
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Real Rules?

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:47 pm

Kath wrote:The porn option was supposed to say kiddie porn. My apologies. Anyway, it's a non-starter - that shit will get you investigated by the government. I won't apologize for editing out graphic details about sex with children. Deal. With. It.
On the premise that it's about kiddie porn, I vote for all 3.

I can't re-vote, so go ahead and add 1 to the Porn vote.
Last edited by SuburbanFarmer on Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25293
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Real Rules?

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:49 pm

Nukedog wrote:Let's get some fact checkers in here

Clubby called out Monte, a personal friend of mine, for being a kiddy fycker after I made some edgy edits to Monte's post on the old forum to fuck with him for shits and giggles. Clubby ran with the meme because he has very little spatial intelligence regarding humor for over two years. Monte got pissed. Kath edited a post that may or may not have been extremely suggestive concerning fucking under age boys. Canadians get upset because a jew was molested and rally for war. So basically this is the gist of your general sperg fests? "Don't mess with Canadians or we will shit up your posts"

You're not a serious nation.
Smitty's just in it for the lulz. capps is tilting at endless windmills for nothing.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th » Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:50 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Kath wrote:The porn option was supposed to say kiddie porn. My apologies. Anyway, it's a non-starter - that shit will get you investigated by the government. I won't apologize for editing out graphic details about sex with children. Deal. With. It.
On the premise that it's about kiddie porn, I vote for all 3.
It is, but if I change it it resets the votes. I'm absolutely confirming I mean kids.
Account abandoned.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Real Rules?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:53 pm

But naked yoga is okay?

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: Real Rules?

Post by pineapplemike » Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:57 pm

i vote yes for 1 in theory but it needs to be more descriptive. spam and off topic shitposting should be allowed only if they derail the thread in both a clever and mean-spirited way. filling threads with inane hockeytalk isn't clever even if it is mean-spirited

i vote no on 2 and 3

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th » Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:00 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:But naked yoga is okay?
If I make it a requirement, are you in 100%? 'Cause I think I have that power; I'll need to check with Martin, because I have no actual power, but other than that, I'm totally powerful to make that rule.
Account abandoned.