Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I haven't done a single thing to you, yet, and you're already bitching. OMFG, dude, seriously, do you have any life goals besides ruining Olympic discussion for other people?
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Yup, but threatening censorship on a pro-free speech forum is quite triggering, so fuck you, I'm going out of my way to piss all over you now and you have it coming.Kath wrote:I haven't done a single thing to you, yet, and you're already bitching. OMFG, dude, seriously, do you have any life goals besides ruining Olympic discussion for other people?
Back down on the censorship tip, then I'll change my vote, and cut you some slack, otherwise go fuck yourself, you should clearly be fired for refusing to back down on this.
Last edited by StCapps on Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Again, I haven't done anything yet, so perhaps hold your outrage until there's actually something to be outraged about.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
StCapps wrote:she's hating on liberty.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Nope, preemption will shame you into doing the right thing, you can't be trusted to do it on your own. Even threatening to play that card, you're lucky you haven't been canned already.Kath wrote:Again, I haven't done anything yet, so perhaps hold your outrage until there's actually something to be outraged about.
Back down or fuck off.
/shrugs
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Fuck you censorship defender.pineapplemike wrote:StCapps wrote:she's hating on liberty.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
meh, this hardly seems worth getting worked up over
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Which side to I vote for to kill piggy?
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Free Speech Hater.pineapplemike wrote:meh, this hardly seems worth getting worked up over
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Vote No, That kills Piggy.TheReal_ND wrote:Which side to I vote for to kill piggy?
Censorship Cunt should not be allowed to continue as moderator, it's Hash's decision, but it's pretty obvious what is the right call here, Martin must not be aware of her censorship on his pro-liberty forum, or he'd have likely done it already.
Last edited by StCapps on Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*